- 87,353
- Rule 12
- GTP_Famine
Nope. We have similar laws to prevent companies making claims about their products' capabilities.Only in 'Merica could this happen, right?
Nope. We have similar laws to prevent companies making claims about their products' capabilities.Only in 'Merica could this happen, right?
We have until March of 2015 to claim it so no big rush. This could cost Red Bull a lot of money.
Nope. We have similar laws to prevent companies making claims about their products' capabilities.
Why do people fall for these sensationalist headlines? The plaintiff never claimed on the grounds that it didn't "give him wings", but on the other claims made by the company - that is, improved physical and mental performance by drinking Red Bull. The only time I can tell the main slogan came up was when it was perceived as adding to the claim of enhanced physical and mental performance. The people who are shaking their heads at this thinking, "o lol, only in america hahaha" should have a word with themselves for not doing a bit more research into these headlines.
Not to mention that this is working out exactly in Red Bull's favour: $13 million given away in freebies will spread like wildfire on the internet and around social media. Who isn't going to hear about them in the next week or two? It's a marketer's wet dream.
Wait...
This is a joke right?
They have agreed to pay $13 million to American consumers in the settlement.
This is stupid. It's like someone would sue Volvo because Volvos are safe and they use it in their marketing, but you still die if you crash in to a lorry 200 km/h even in a Volvo.
Anyway, I want to meet the person that actually thought that Red Bull would give you wings, just to see what kind of an idiot that person is.
Why do people fall for these sensationalist headlines? The plaintiff never claimed on the grounds that it didn't "give him wings", but on the other claims made by the company - that is, improved physical and mental performance by drinking Red Bull. The only time I can tell the main slogan came up was when it was perceived as adding to the claim of enhanced physical and mental performance. The people who are shaking their heads at this thinking, "o lol, only in america hahaha" should have a word with themselves for not doing a bit more research into these headlines.
Not to mention that this is working out exactly in Red Bull's favour: $13 million given away in freebies will spread like wildfire on the internet and around social media. Who isn't going to hear about them in the next week or two? It's a marketer's wet dream.
Why do people fall for these sensationalist headlines? The plaintiff never claimed on the grounds that it didn't "give him wings", but on the other claims made by the company - that is, improved physical and mental performance by drinking Red Bull. The only time I can tell the main slogan came up was when it was perceived as adding to the claim of enhanced physical and mental performance. The people who are shaking their heads at this thinking, "o lol, only in america hahaha" should have a word with themselves for not doing a bit more research into these headlines.
Not to mention that this is working out exactly in Red Bull's favour: $13 million given away in freebies will spread like wildfire on the internet and around social media. Who isn't going to hear about them in the next week or two? It's a marketer's wet dream.
My problem with it is that it's still a money-grab by greedy people... not an exclusively 'Murican problem I admit.
Money grab.. by who exactly? The plaintiff won't receive any more than anyone else who applies for the reimbursement, because they've settled it outside of court.
And exactly why Red Bull is one of the biggest companies in the world.$13 million in settlements. $25 millions worth of free advertising. Priceless.
It should probably be noted that if a certain number of people sign up and the $13 million is reached, then the reimbursement will begin to be diluted so that every person can receive a share.
Americans,
Does this not make you sad, that this thing can actually happen? Not the free money but the actual lawsuit?