I still don't get it.
I was under the impression that it was root beer soda flavored as root beer vape juice. In the similar vein on Coke soda flavored cherry.It kind of makes sense, because some 'flavours' are really nothing like the actual thing they are meant to taste like... like grape soda (my favourite flavour, bizarrely unavailable in the UK), 'strawberry' sweets, 'bacon' crisps etc. Technically you could have 'bacon crisp-flavoured bacon', or something like that. But 'root beer vape juice-flavoured root beer' is not root beer, it's root beer vape juice-flavoured soda, surely? I need a sit down.
Physics, how do they work?
You put energy into the battery but you also use energy from the battery while driving. So it is at least, how you say it in English a "cost neutrality" operation.Physics, how do they work?
Lol, of course. It'll use up more energy btw.Oops, was it a hypothetical question?
I don't get @MatskiMonk's joke
That depends on the usage of the driver and the way he/she drives the car. In theory it is zero neutrality. In reality/in practice the "generator" probably produces less than the car uses.Lol, of course. It'll use up more energy btw.
Thanks for the help. I'll need at least a week or even longer to process and understand it. The strangest thing is that I use to be good at statistics (truth).The premise is that the character who's taken the statistics class now has a greater understanding of correlation and causality, however, when he tries to apply this new knowledge to the statement made by the long haired character in the final frame, he's actually less able to determine if the statement is accurate than if he'd just applied his old logic of correlation implies causation.