SambertoWho needs Ferraris when we have midget races?
ragundyEhi guys make more JGTC cars pics!!!!!! My favorite is Esso Ultraflo Supra...
Race IdiotI almost thought that Citeza was a lambo untill I looked at it closely.
SambertoWho needs Ferraris when we have midget races?
SambertoThats the idea
Incidentally Brett, I am yet to come across a Cerbera or Griffith with the orange low kilometre tag.
Race IdiotIsn't it designed by the same person who did the Diablo?
I can't say i've seen a non Japanese car with the low kilometre tag, well off the top of my head anyway. Although currently in the old timers section about half of the cars in there have them.
SambertoYes, Marcello Gandini was responsible for both monstrosities. The wheels really do help
Mac_PowahNow, is it just me, or did Polyphony seem to skimp on certain cars just because they didn't see them as important as others? I asked Tim Brad to snap some pics of an '03 Acura 3.2 CL type S, and the detail is horrible. All pixilated on the rear, and the side view mirrors look grey and grainy/blurry. It just seems that the same attention should have gone into all cars, because I like that car, and now I prolly won't use it in photo mode.
http://www.timbrad.com/gt4/Acura 3.2 CL/Acura 3.2 CL.JPG
zonekillIve made GT4 website with Photo mode gallery. KLIK link in SIG.
Tell me what you think about my website!
TekkThat doesn't look good 👎 I think you're right when you say some cars look less detailed, I've noticed that in GT3 too. I can't really understand why that happens though...
ragundyGood site... but there's not your shots right?
zonekillThanks,......NO only a collection from around the net.
Mac_PowahNow, is it just me, or did Polyphony seem to skimp on certain cars just because they didn't see them as important as others? I asked Tim Brad to snap some pics of an '03 Acura 3.2 CL type S, and the detail is horrible. All pixilated on the rear, and the side view mirrors look grey and grainy/blurry. It just seems that the same attention should have gone into all cars, because I like that car, and now I prolly won't use it in photo mode.
http://www.timbrad.com/gt4/Acura%203.2%20CL/Acura%203.2%20CL.JPG
Mac_PowahNow, is it just me, or did Polyphony seem to skimp on certain cars just because they didn't see them as important as others? I asked Tim Brad to snap some pics of an '03 Acura 3.2 CL type S, and the detail is horrible. All pixilated on the rear, and the side view mirrors look grey and grainy/blurry. It just seems that the same attention should have gone into all cars, because I like that car, and now I prolly won't use it in photo mode.
http://www.timbrad.com/gt4/Acura 3.2 CL/Acura 3.2 CL.JPG
Nice, any chances to get bigger size? I love your pictures !mavMy first car, the Hachi Roku w/ old sytle BBS wheels.