The good news: It's the best Ghost In The Shell movie they've made so far.
The bad news: It's still pretty bad.
The writing is SO bad. The first half of the movie felt like Mass Effect Andromeda bad (It didn't help that all the original music "inspiration" that was supposed to be there was replaced by generic Clint Mansell "mass effecty" beeps and boops). It was so slow and suffers terribly from explaining-everything-I-do-instead-of-doing-it. Character introductions were piss-poor if not non-existent. I purposely took my mom to see the movie and she told me that if I didn't explain the franchise to her before we went, she would have been totally lost.
ScarJo's performance is pretty bad at times, I have to say. At times, she looks and moves like a protocol droid rather than the pinnacle of cybernetic technology. She has some good moments, though. The acting aspect of the movie seems like they filmed for a month, took the summer off, and then came back and filmed the rest. It doesn't seem like the same cast as the movie goes on.
I also hated how they handled Aramaki and subtitles. They turned him from a shrewd strategist into an ineffective joke of a leader at best and a thug with a gun at worst. The subtitles dance around the screen, which was ****ing
annoying on a huge theater screen, and the fact that Beat is the only one speaking Japanese made it seem like he wasn't in the same film. It's like they just brought him in and made him do some lines. Like, imagine the T-rex in Jurassic Park speaking French to Malcolm. I don't know why they thought it would work.
Luckily, the movie gets much better for the second half where the real plot comes into focus and they start marching up its slope of rising action.
As far as tributes to the original, the tank sequence was pretty cool. Earlier in this thread I mentioned what I wanted from the scene, and I'm happy that they included it. I'm not sure I like the changes they made though. The best part about the tank scene in the original is that we finally got to see the invincible Major break, revealing the crude mechanics underneath her skin. The new movie makes her broken from the get go, so one of the most powerful scenes in film history loses pretty much all of its meaning.
It's almost scary how unoriginal this attempt at a GITS movie was. There was some speculation early on once we knew that
would be a character, and the speculators were 100% correct. It's like Rupert Sanders took the original movie and remixed it with the "AFFECTION" episode from Stand Alone Complex 2.
And in the process--speaking of meaning-- they totally twisted the whole point of GITS on its head. They kept repeating the message "it's not your memories that make you who you are, it's what you do." This is exactly the opposite of what defines
Ghost in the Shell. The miracle of GITS is that the ghost survives. If this mantra was really the meaning of the movie, then the Major would just be a Hanka killing machine. She wouldn't be Motoko at all. It's like the whole movie doesn't even understand what it is, and it refuses to address anything remotely philosophical besides "WHO AM I?!?!?!" and "DEY STOLED IT!" It's so savagely base for such a visually rich film.
I agree completely with the current Rotten Tomatoes consensus. It's a 49% right now and labeled "Hollow and pretty." Nail hit squarely on the head...