Global Warming/Climate Change Discussion Thread

  • Thread starter ZAGGIN
  • 3,644 comments
  • 221,458 views

Which of the following statements best reflects your views on Global Warming?


  • Total voters
    497
I'd be about 30km out at sea.

You better buy a lot of this then.

P_SelleysNoMoreGapsMultipurpose.jpg


Or as Kylenat says, just move somewhere else, although it might be hard finding room on the least densely populated country on the planet.
 
Normal is not pumping greenhouse crap into the atmosphere.

So lack of humans makes the earth normal? So what would lack of other animals do.... make the earth even more normal?

Why don't you lead by example and do your best not to 'pump greenhouse crap' into the atmosphere....... *Your que to switch off your computer*


It would be great if the sea came closer, especially with all the warming that is supposed to be happening I will be closer to the sea to swim and cool down, and my house will have an even better seaview and rise in value.... Woo bring it on. :D
 
It's not going to be a huge tidal wave that will kill everyone without notice. Even if the exaggerated reports of global warming are true, what makes you think all of the ice on land is going to melt at once? Is anyone stupid enough to actually stay in their house by the coast when the tide creeps up every year?
 
No one ever thinks of the tortoises! Or the sloths!

The human race never think of the consequences!
 
Normal is not pumping greenhouse crap into the atmosphere.

The "greenhouse crap" we "pump into the atmosphere" is the equivalent of putting one single drop of red food colouring into 10 litres of water.


The "normal" world puts in 50 times as much.
 
Being at the Race of Champions depressed me for a few minutes.

Hearing the Focus with Anti Lag - great.
Hearing the Quattro with it's 80's soundtrack - magic.
Hearing the Toro Rosso and RBR F1 cars - unbelievable

Hearing the car that won the 2007 Le Mans.... :(

So as I sat there in the cold, I realised, it may only get worse.
 
I worry about the future of performance and race cars with all this hype over global warming. Even now cars as we know them are dying, just look at all the little electric space pod looking cars at this past Tokyo auto show. And as far as I can tell no matter how much we cut vehicle emissions things on this planet will continue to change. Nothing is permanent on Earth. We will just have to adapt like always. Humans are fairly intelligent animals after all, plus we have adapted to various situations before, so what is stopping us now?

Also, as it stands there is no way to make completely "clean" aircraft, considering electric propulsion cannot meet the power to weight ratio that larger aircraft need, especially commercial planes. One CF6 turbofan from a 747 engine can put out 50,000 hp when used in ground/sea applications. The version on the 747 makes 60,000 lbs of thrust for some models. Lets see any kind of non polluting power source do that in our lifetimes. About the only thing you can do with aircraft is lower fuel consumption (which is always being done) or change the fuels they burn. Jet engines aren't as picky about fuels as piston engines are ;)
 
I worry about the future of performance and race cars with all this hype over global warming. Even now cars as we know them are dying

Be glad you aren't in the European Union.

All new cars manufactured for sale in the European Union must emit no more than 120 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometre before 2012.

No, you didn't read that wrong.

Here's some examples of reasonably performing cars and their carbon dioxide emissions:
2007 BMW M3 Coupe - 295g/km DEAD BY 2011
2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage - 358g/km DEAD BY 2011
2004 Porsche Boxster 2.7 - 222g/km DEAD BY 2011
2008 Jaguar XF 2.7d - 199g/km DEAD BY 2011

Let's go slower:
2005 Mazda MX-5 1.8 - 174g/km DEAD BY 2011
2005 Ford Fiesta ST 2.0 - 177g/km DEAD BY 2011
2007 Vauxhall Corsa VXR - 190g/km DEAD BY 2011

In fact, here's a list of all the current European-manufacturer cars which won't be dead by 2011:
Petrol
Peugeot 107 - 109g/km
Smart ForTwo - 113g/km (51hp)/120g/km (61hp)
Vauxhall Corsa 1.0 - 115g/km
Diesel
Citroen C1 1.3
Citroen C2 1.4 - 113g/km
Citroen C3 1.4/1.6 - 115g/km & 120g/km
Citroen C4 1.6 - 120g/km
FIAT Panda 1.2 - 114g/km
FIAT Punto 1.2 - 119g/km
Ford Fiesta 1.4/1.6 - 119g/km & 116g/km
Ford Fusion 1.4/1.6 - 119g/km
Mini Cooper D - 118g/km
Peugeot 207 1.4/1.6 - 120g/km
Renault Clio 1.4 - 115g/km
Renault Megane 1.5 - 120g/km
Renault Modus 1.5 - 120g/km
Skoda Fabia 1.4 - 120g/km
Vauxhall Corsa 1.2/1.3 - 115g/km & 119g/km
VW Polo 1.4 - 119g/km


Welcome to European driving nirvana folks - no Porsche, Ferrari, TVR, Aston Martin, Jaguar, Alfa Romeo, Audi, Noble, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Brabus, Ruf, Ascari, Ariel, Maserati, Koenigsegg, Lamborghini or Lotus, but a huge fleet of diesel hatchbacks. Nothing else will be legal.
 
Be glad you aren't in the European Union.

All new cars manufactured for sale in the European Union must emit no more than 120 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometre before 2012.

No, you didn't read that wrong.

Here's some examples of reasonably performing cars and their carbon dioxide emissions:
2007 BMW M3 Coupe - 295g/km DEAD BY 2011
2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage - 358g/km DEAD BY 2011
2004 Porsche Boxster 2.7 - 222g/km DEAD BY 2011
2008 Jaguar XF 2.7d - 199g/km DEAD BY 2011

Let's go slower:
2005 Mazda MX-5 1.8 - 174g/km DEAD BY 2011
2005 Ford Fiesta ST 2.0 - 177g/km DEAD BY 2011
2007 Vauxhall Corsa VXR - 190g/km DEAD BY 2011

In fact, here's a list of all the current European-manufacturer cars which won't be dead by 2011:
Petrol
Peugeot 107 - 109g/km
Smart ForTwo - 113g/km (51hp)/120g/km (61hp)
Vauxhall Corsa 1.0 - 115g/km
Diesel
Citroen C1 1.3
Citroen C2 1.4 - 113g/km
Citroen C3 1.4/1.6 - 115g/km & 120g/km
Citroen C4 1.6 - 120g/km
FIAT Panda 1.2 - 114g/km
FIAT Punto 1.2 - 119g/km
Ford Fiesta 1.4/1.6 - 119g/km & 116g/km
Ford Fusion 1.4/1.6 - 119g/km
Mini Cooper D - 118g/km
Peugeot 207 1.4/1.6 - 120g/km
Renault Clio 1.4 - 115g/km
Renault Megane 1.5 - 120g/km
Renault Modus 1.5 - 120g/km
Skoda Fabia 1.4 - 120g/km
Vauxhall Corsa 1.2/1.3 - 115g/km & 119g/km
VW Polo 1.4 - 119g/km


Welcome to European driving nirvana folks - no Porsche, Ferrari, TVR, Aston Martin, Jaguar, Alfa Romeo, Audi, Noble, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Brabus, Ruf, Ascari, Ariel, Maserati, Koenigsegg, Lamborghini or Lotus, but a huge fleet of diesel hatchbacks. Nothing else will be legal.

That disturbs me greatly :crazy:
I have a feeling that mandate won't be met, especially considering 2011 is only 3 years away. It's not like car manufacturers can develop brand new cars and drivetrains overnight. I just can't see that happening...
 
Don't worry, I'm sure Ferrari has more legal power than the European Union by themselves to challenge the mandate, never mind the rest of the sports car manufacturers that are sentenced to death by it. I cannot imagine a Ferrari electric or diesel. It's impossible. They would have to move to North America if that happened.
 
I doubt those limits will actually go into affect by 2011, how can they make a law saying that a car can only emit Xg of CO2 per kilometre while it would ruin dozens of car manufacturers?
 
I doubt those limits will actually go into affect by 2011, how can they make a law saying that a car can only emit Xg of CO2 per kilometre while it would ruin dozens of car manufacturers?

Because they're hippies who don't care about car manufacturers, since all of them conspired to kill the electric car, supposedly. :rolleyes:

I dunno if if this is possible or not, but I've seen some weird stuff happen in my life. Like the Vancouver Champ Cars race being kicked out, for instance.
 
I hate electric cars.....very little mechanisms that go into making it work......


I think that mandate won't happend,the European Automotive Justice League of Ferrari,Aston Martin,TVR, BMW,and friends won't let the Legion of Doom Win.


The good guys always win........right?



If there is a possible way of making a hydrogen powered car whose engine runs like an internat combustion,I would become happy( excuse me, for my lack of knowledge, I know very little of how a hydrogen car functions)
 
I don't think it will kill of car manufacturers. People still need cars. And people will still buy a Ferrari if it had a 1.2L engine because it's a Ferrari.
 
Be glad you aren't in the European Union.

All new cars manufactured for sale in the European Union must emit no more than 120 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometre before 2012.

No, you didn't read that wrong.

Here's some examples of reasonably performing cars and their carbon dioxide emissions:
2007 BMW M3 Coupe - 295g/km DEAD BY 2011
2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage - 358g/km DEAD BY 2011
2004 Porsche Boxster 2.7 - 222g/km DEAD BY 2011
2008 Jaguar XF 2.7d - 199g/km DEAD BY 2011

Let's go slower:
2005 Mazda MX-5 1.8 - 174g/km DEAD BY 2011
2005 Ford Fiesta ST 2.0 - 177g/km DEAD BY 2011
2007 Vauxhall Corsa VXR - 190g/km DEAD BY 2011

In fact, here's a list of all the current European-manufacturer cars which won't be dead by 2011:
Petrol
Peugeot 107 - 109g/km
Smart ForTwo - 113g/km (51hp)/120g/km (61hp)
Vauxhall Corsa 1.0 - 115g/km
Diesel
Citroen C1 1.3
Citroen C2 1.4 - 113g/km
Citroen C3 1.4/1.6 - 115g/km & 120g/km
Citroen C4 1.6 - 120g/km
FIAT Panda 1.2 - 114g/km
FIAT Punto 1.2 - 119g/km
Ford Fiesta 1.4/1.6 - 119g/km & 116g/km
Ford Fusion 1.4/1.6 - 119g/km
Mini Cooper D - 118g/km
Peugeot 207 1.4/1.6 - 120g/km
Renault Clio 1.4 - 115g/km
Renault Megane 1.5 - 120g/km
Renault Modus 1.5 - 120g/km
Skoda Fabia 1.4 - 120g/km
Vauxhall Corsa 1.2/1.3 - 115g/km & 119g/km
VW Polo 1.4 - 119g/km


Welcome to European driving nirvana folks - no Porsche, Ferrari, TVR, Aston Martin, Jaguar, Alfa Romeo, Audi, Noble, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Brabus, Ruf, Ascari, Ariel, Maserati, Koenigsegg, Lamborghini or Lotus, but a huge fleet of diesel hatchbacks. Nothing else will be legal.

That's just crazy. Personally I think those companies will work some kind of back door deal and get the mandates pushed back.
 
Its funny how many people are determined to find a mistake you made, I don't get the whole ethos behind people trying to prove you wrong.

I've been known to be wrong - like when I decided a forearm smash across the table was a great idea and nearly ended up blinding a friend... :lol:
 
I've been known to be wrong - like when I decided a forearm smash across the table was a great idea and nearly ended up blinding a friend... :lol:

I hadn't realised that was a mistake...:D
 
Be glad you aren't in the European Union.

All new cars manufactured for sale in the European Union must emit no more than 120 grams of carbon dioxide per kilometre before 2012.

No, you didn't read that wrong.

Here's some examples of reasonably performing cars and their carbon dioxide emissions:
2007 BMW M3 Coupe - 295g/km DEAD BY 2011
2005 Aston Martin V8 Vantage - 358g/km DEAD BY 2011
2004 Porsche Boxster 2.7 - 222g/km DEAD BY 2011
2008 Jaguar XF 2.7d - 199g/km DEAD BY 2011

Let's go slower:
2005 Mazda MX-5 1.8 - 174g/km DEAD BY 2011
2005 Ford Fiesta ST 2.0 - 177g/km DEAD BY 2011
2007 Vauxhall Corsa VXR - 190g/km DEAD BY 2011

In fact, here's a list of all the current European-manufacturer cars which won't be dead by 2011:
Petrol
Peugeot 107 - 109g/km
Smart ForTwo - 113g/km (51hp)/120g/km (61hp)
Vauxhall Corsa 1.0 - 115g/km
Diesel
Citroen C1 1.3
Citroen C2 1.4 - 113g/km
Citroen C3 1.4/1.6 - 115g/km & 120g/km
Citroen C4 1.6 - 120g/km
FIAT Panda 1.2 - 114g/km
FIAT Punto 1.2 - 119g/km
Ford Fiesta 1.4/1.6 - 119g/km & 116g/km
Ford Fusion 1.4/1.6 - 119g/km
Mini Cooper D - 118g/km
Peugeot 207 1.4/1.6 - 120g/km
Renault Clio 1.4 - 115g/km
Renault Megane 1.5 - 120g/km
Renault Modus 1.5 - 120g/km
Skoda Fabia 1.4 - 120g/km
Vauxhall Corsa 1.2/1.3 - 115g/km & 119g/km
VW Polo 1.4 - 119g/km


Welcome to European driving nirvana folks - no Porsche, Ferrari, TVR, Aston Martin, Jaguar, Alfa Romeo, Audi, Noble, BMW, Mercedes-Benz, Brabus, Ruf, Ascari, Ariel, Maserati, Koenigsegg, Lamborghini or Lotus, but a huge fleet of diesel hatchbacks. Nothing else will be legal.

That's crazy, although at least we have a few more years of production.
 
I've overegged it a smidge - they won't be dead, but they will be fined (by whom? Who knows...).

This is how the fines work:
1. Work out the average of the rated carbons of every individual model sold by a manufacturer.
2. Take off 120g/km
3. Multiply by the total sales figures of the car.
4. Multiply by £14.35 (this is the fine per gram in excess of 120g/km per car).

So, say Famine Fast Fleet sells 87 cars at an average of 278g/km in 2012. I would be fined £197,255.10 ({[278-120]*87}*£14.35) - or I'd put £2,267 onto the sticker price of all of my cars. Call it £2,500 and make a bit of profit in there too.

Imagine the fines if you're Ferrari or Porsche and sell lots of highly-carboned cars. Imagine the fines if you're Ford and sell staggering amounts of just-over-the-limit cars. Now imagine you're a car buyer and the costs which have been passed onto you.


Personally, I'd buy something older. And hence more "polluting".
 
Fining companies like that is pointless, like when fining supermarkets for price fixing, or banks etc. Those companies don't pay anything, we, the consumer do.

Farce.

The idea itself could work, but that target is lower than the best limbo dancer could go.
 
Methinks the dwindling of easily extractable pre-existing hydrocarbon fuel sources will limit our choices much faster than some ninny-nanny legislation.

But who cares? Give me anything with four wheels and the possibility of acquainting myself with the nearest hedge (be it by pedal power, electric power or a methane pump stuck up my behind) and I'll be happy.
 
Just saw this on Sky News this morning.

Climate Disaster 'May Strike This Century'.

A team of international experts, led by the University of East Anglia, say global warming is pushing key ecological components past "tipping point".

In other words, if our carbon emissions, along with global temperatures, continue to rise, the systems could reach the point of no return, with catastrophic results.

It had been previously thought that the melting of the Greenland ice cap might happen over a thousand years.

But a report by the team claims it could be gone in as little as 300 years.

That could cause sea levels to rise by as much as 7 metres and leave vast swathes of low-lying cities like London or New York under water.The scientists believe that in some cases, like that of the Arctic sea-ice, the tipping point may have already been reached.

Recent research shows the ice is disappearing much faster than expected and the Arctic could be ice-free in summer by as early as 2013.

Professor Tim Lenton and his team compiled their report using computer models, which delve into our climate's past and can also predict the future.
He said: "Our findings suggest that a variety of tipping elements could reach their critical point within this century under human-induced climate change.

"The greatest threats are tipping of the Arctic sea-ice and the Greenland ice sheet, and at least five other elements could surprise us by exhibiting a nearby tipping point."

For the UK, one of the most worrying possibilities is the collapse of the Atlantic circulation system - the water-driven heat conveyor belt which transports warm water into the Northern Hemisphere. Without it, Britain's climate would be more akin to Newfoundland in Canada, or other frozen places along a similar latitude.

The UK's most famous naturalist Sir David Attenborough told Sky News: "I think it's very alarming. The tipping point is an incredibly difficult thing to predict because it's this one moment where something sudden happens and all kinds of consequences cascade from it.

"Predicting one particular moment of the future is much more difficult than predicting trends - but certainly it is a grave danger."

The overriding message from the new report is clear - if we continue to emit carbon dioxide at our current rate and temperatures rise beyond 2 degrees Celsius by the end of the century, some of the earth's most finely-tuned systems will be disrupted.

The nine so-called "tipping elements" and the timescale for their decline once the tipping point is reached are:

:: Melting of Arctic sea-ice (could take 10 years).
:: Decay of the Greenland ice sheet (more than 300 years).
:: Collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet (more than 300 years).
:: Collapse of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation (approx 100 years).
:: Increase in the El Nino Southern Oscillation (approx 100 years).
:: Collapse of the Indian summer monsoon (approx 1 year).
:: Greening of the Sahara/Sahel and disruption of the West African monsoon (approx 10 years).
:: Dieback of the Amazon rainforest (approx 50 years).
:: Dieback of the Boreal Forest (approx 50 years).
 

Latest Posts

Back