- 27,210
- United Kingdom
I fixed the awful thing.
Its exploding everywhere on the internet. At my job, everyone who works in the dealership won't stop talking about it. I think it came up in my own conversations 3 times today alone.This thing is so bad, my coworker and I were discussing how ugly it was, when my GM popped up out of nowhere and without even knowing what car we were talking about, he remarked, “That new GM truck? Yeah, that’s hideous.”
Having seen reviews of ludicrously expensive trucks I sort of get it. As long as you don't care about performance, you're getting a car that is comfortable and has loads of luxury features, but looks a lot less expensive/pretentious in a rural area than a European luxury car. And as a bonus, it's a lot more usable in that it'll tow, haul, and go [a bit] off road. I'd still have a decent sports car for that sort of money (996TT, for instance) but I do like the idea of driving perhaps the ultimate stealth luxury vehicle, VW Phaeton notwithstanding.I'd still never pay a mortgage payment for a truck.
The luxury end of it would be fine of the money if you can consider anything GM makes to be "luxury" past the first 90 days. Their interior quality is God awful.Having seen reviews of ludicrously expensive trucks I sort of get it. As long as you don't care about performance, you're getting a car that is comfortable and has loads of luxury features, but looks a lot less expensive/pretentious in a rural area than a European luxury car. And as a bonus, it's a lot more usable in that it'll tow, haul, and go [a bit] off road. I'd still have a decent sports car for that sort of money (996TT, for instance) but I do like the idea of driving perhaps the ultimate stealth luxury vehicle, VW Phaeton notwithstanding.
I will admit that I'm using @m5power's (Doug DeMuro) videos as a primary source here, but the F250 platinum did look nice. However, the Sierra Denali's interior was just awful, and it's amazing how stereotypically GM it is. I swear you can feel the cheapness of the plastic through the video.The luxury end of it would be fine of the money if you can consider anything GM makes to be "luxury" past the first 90 days. Their interior quality is God awful.
Overall the feel has gotten much tighter as a whole, especially when compared to 10-12 years ago during their fallout. But even still they leave a lot to be desired especially if I'm shelling out the cost of a small home.I will admit that I'm using @m5power's (Doug DeMuro) videos as a primary source here, but the F250 platinum did look nice. However, the Sierra Denali's interior was just awful, and it's amazing how stereotypically GM it is. I swear you can feel the cheapness of the plastic through the video.
True, though I wish that's what a small home cost around here. They're more like £150-200k .Overall the feel has gotten much tighter as a whole, especially when compared to 10-12 years ago during their fallout. But even still they leave a lot to be desired especially if I'm shelling out the cost of a small home.
True, though I wish that's what a small home cost around here. They're more like £150-200k .
Lucky you. You don't even want to know what they are here....
I think they should just go all the way
I lost itThat's the electric version.
This design somehow does remind me of another pickup truck that's small and mostly just made specifically for ASEAN countries.Man, only now are they showing the 2020 pictures, but there's already a 2030 Silverado in the works:
https://www.caranddriver.com/news/a25953794/chevrolet-silverado-four-cylinder-fuel-economy-test/The 2.7T averaged 18 mpg over the 200-mile test, a 28 percent drop from the 21 mpg we observed in the 5.3-liter RST Crew Cab, which was a full 314 pounds heavier.
We asked Hugh Milne, Silverado marketing manager, about what Chevrolet thinks of all the criticism leveled at it, and how the HD ended up this way in the first place.
"How much of that reaction is from people who actually buy these trucks? I read all that stuff, I hear about all that. All of our research that we ever did on this, we're talking to Heavy Duty buyers of all brands. This front end and this design over the top was one of our best-ranked designs," Milne told us.
So in short, focus groups is how we got here. Most car companies use focus groups to help make design decisions. The court of public opinion doesn't seem to agree with those focus groups for the time being on the many Silverado HD grilles, though. Comments sections across all of our previous posts and the internet writ large are littered with snarky remarks toward the HD.
Chevrolet does appear cognizant of the controversy surrounding the truck. Milne posits that a lot of the negativity surrounding it won't make much of a difference anyway, questioning where the reaction is coming from. It's impossible to know if heavy duty truck buyers specifically are upset with the design, but positive reactions are hard to come by from onlookers. Still, he has a point, because truck buyers certainly appear to enjoy tough-looking designs. If any segment is going to like this face, it's going to be this one.
As we look upon the array of grilles up close and in person, they're not as offensive as the pictures make them out to be. The LT trim initially shown is still a bit egregious, but the High Country is much classier. None of them fix the double stacked headlight design on every truck, but you can do a lot to change the look depending on the trim you choose.
Regardless of which side of the argument you fall on the Silverado HD, we at least have an understanding of where it came from. Focus groups and market research don't always produce a pretty vehicle. The Aztek happened, and many other misfires followed in its footsteps. Perhaps the "top ranked" designs in research don't always translate to good designs in practice.