RaghavanI think Poverty is using imperial gallons to get the higher mpg mark, right?
JCE3000GTTwo reasons why GM won't sell Holdens here:
1) GM's US car model lineup would get creamated in sales if these Holdens were at the same price point. Holdens have so much better looking cars.
2) The cost associated with importing them and "fitting them" with American BS would put the cost over similar competitive American models--which nullifies reason #1.
I say GM scraps any US-born car and just imports better formats from it's EU/AU markets and LIMITS what they change to them...I'm sick of all this nannifying the US automakers do and this rediculous "company brand front end" STAMPED on the front of EVERY car is retarded. Dodge does it, Ford does it, and GM does it (not as bad as the other 2). In contrast so does a few Japanese automakers...*cough*Subaru*cough*.
The Cobalt SS is a much better car than the VXR. Although the VXR has a more powerful engine, that is exactly why it is not as good as the Cobalt SS. The VXR has way too much power for an FF car, and the result is ungodly understeer. The Cobalt SS on the other hand, has been praised for its excellent handling. And the SS certainly is not lacking in straight line speed. I also think the Cobalt SS is a cheaper car if you did the currency conversions.YSSMANI personally think the Vectra VXR would sell a helluva lot better here in the states than the Saturn Ion Redline or Cobalt SS, as it is faster and better looking. Hopefully the folks at Saturn get their hands on that one as well, as it is begining to appear as though Saturns in becoming the US version of Vauxhaull/Opel/Holden (sans RWD V8 models)...
I see. I was hoping those were actual obtainable mpg values here in the US!nikyAgreed. The Volks/Audi nose was interesting when it came out, but now its just overdone.
Not really, he's quoting UK-sourced EC figures, which besides using UK Gallons vs. US Gallons, uses a different testing regimen from the EPA tests. I've posted the differences in the previous page. Not his fault, really, the numbers confused the hell out of me till I looked them up.
Hey, they could have modelled them on uglier cars.BlazinXtremeThe Amanti looks like a Benz and Jaguar mated, the Spectra looks similar to a Protege, Sedona looks a lot like a Windstar/Freestar.
The reason for the big warrenites was because back in the 90's Korean cars were crappy, no questioning that...in order to sell them they had to put a huge warrenty on them. Not saying they are bad now, but they once were.
SageThat said, Im anxious to see the pricing on the Honda Fit when its brought stateside in Spring. Too bad the Yaris hatchback looks like a soccer ball for Hummers, because I dont want the sedan (which actually looks decent, and has a slightly less dumb-looking center console).
a6m5I agree, but I don't think Ford is guilty of it.....
At least, not locally.
I had the feeling, that's why I said locally. Your lineup looks much better than the American one. I've seen the new Focus, only in pictures. In the States, we still get the "minor changed" Focus. It's the second pic I posted. New Focus looks really good.ultrabeatWe have corporate facing
SageThat said, Im anxious to see the pricing on the Honda Fit when its brought stateside in Spring.
RaghavanThe only thing i'm anxious for is a small (Civic size) RWD car with a manual with a base price of $14-15k. Put a small 4 cylinder in and have a 5 speed manual. That way, all the young, poor car enthusiasts like me can have a real car.
Wolfe2x7Unless you're simply talking about new cars -- if so, just wait a few years and import a used BMW 1-series.
YSSMANCar and Driver just tested the 120d, and came away impressed. But at $25K, its extremely expensive and doesnt perform as well as, say, the Volkswagen GTI/GLI or Audi A3...
YSSMANThere was word a while ago that Chevrolet may greenlight the Nomad Conept from the 2003 Detroit show... Baisicly a four seat Solstice/Sky with a hard top and a hatch back... I suppose that would have fallen into the category youre talking about...