Goodbye, USS Enterprise

  • Thread starter niky
  • 37 comments
  • 3,210 views

niky

Karma Chameleon
Staff Emeritus
23,800
Philippines
Philippines
121101010802-uss-enterprise-story-top.jpg


http://edition.cnn.com/2012/11/01/us/enterprise-scrap/index.html?hpt=us_bn2

Washington (CNN) -- The USS Enterprise is the nation's oldest active duty warship, the first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier and a history-making symbol of America's naval might for half a century.

But it's now headed for the scrap heap.

Virtually all the weapons and ammunition has been off loaded. By the end of the week, it'll make its final return to its home port of Norfolk, Virginia. On Dec. 1, "The Big E" will be become officially inactive.

But one doesn't just take an aircraft carrier with eight nuclear reactors in its hold and park it somewhere. The Navy will spend three years and tens of millions of dollars removing the ship's radioactive fuel and reactors before cutting it into scrap.

Mike Maus, a spokesperson for Naval Air Force Atlantic, said the process starts just up the James River.

"Following the inactivation period, it will be towed over to Newport News -- to Huntington Ingalls Newport News Shipbuilding -- where it will be defueled. They'll remove all the fuel from it."

The fuel will be shipped to Idaho for temporary storage, Maus said. "Sometime at a later date, it will be disposed of."

While in Newport News, some of the Enterprise's equipment will be removed then the next phase begins.

The carrier, minus planes, ammunition and a propulsion system, heads to Puget Sound, the long way.

"It will be towed around (Cape) Horn to Puget Sound, Washington," Maus said.

The Enterprise, like America's other nuclear carriers, is too big to fit through the Panama Canal, so it must round the southern-most point of South America to get to Washington State.

"It'll be a very lengthy tow," he said.

Once it reaches the Puget Sound Naval Shipyard, the long and difficult task of removing the eight reactors from the Enterprise's hold begins.

"In order to remove the reactors, it takes a lot of cutting and hacking on the ship to do that," Maus said. "They do cut through the flight deck and they may very well be cutting through the hull of the ship itself."

Once the reactors are removed, CVN-65 will be formally decommissioned.

According to a Navy Environmental Impact Statement, the reactors will be put on barges, floated up the Columbia River to the site of the former Hanford nuclear production complex where they will be buried in a huge trench near reactors from smaller decommissioned naval warships.

But unlike the USS Intrepid in New York City or the USS Midway in San Diego, the Enterprise is not destined to become a floating museum.

Removing the reactors essentially destroys the ship.

"Once the reactors are removed, to put the ship back in any shape to where it still resembles a ship the cost would be over the moon," said Maus.

So the ship, all 90,000 tons of it will be cut up and the metal sold for scrap.

But that doesn't mean the name Enterprise will fade from U.S. Navy history. There have been seven other warships to bear that name and there is already a petition to name a yet-to-be-built carrier the ninth USS Enterprise.

It's pretty sad that the Enterprise cannot be salvaged as a vessel or a floating museum.

That said, I look forward to the construction of the Enterprise's replacement, the NCC 1701.

USS_Enterprise_(NCC-1701-A).jpg


Yeah, yeah... I know... not canon. But the Shuttle Enterprise is retired, and I've never watched "Star Trek: Enterprise", so give me a break.
 
How to know you're a geek: You enter this thread expecting Star Trek to have been cancelled, rather than a ship retired.
 
How to know you're a geek: You enter this thread expecting Star Trek to have been cancelled, rather than a ship retired.

How to know you're a geek/nerd part 2.

You know the USS Enterprise CV-6 was the only US aircraft carrier to survive the entire Pacific war.

Shame to see this go.
 
Last edited:
Shipped to Idaho, eh?

"What do I do with these fuel rods, boss?"
"Throw it in with the potatoes-- GOSH!"

Wouldn't it be cheaper to just drive the ship to Puget Sound, THEN defuel it?
 
The question is where do they dump the fuel up in the Great Nor'West? Just stuff it in a few boxes, label them "dirty bombs" and send them over to the bomber bases up there? :D

The nuclear Enterprise used to be the big dog of the fleet. It deserves more than the scrap heap. Why not just anchor it off Puget Sound and plug it into the lighting grid. There's got to be some juice left in the old girl, yet!
 
A true loss to have it scrapped. I don't know how many times I've been to the Intrepid, but there's always a reason to go back. I would have loved to do the same with this ship.

Maybe whoever it was who was building a new Titanic should consider a replica of this instead.
 
How to know you're a geek: You enter this thread expecting Star Trek to have been cancelled, rather than a ship retired.

Same. :lol:

How to know you're a geek/nerd part 2.

You know the USS Enterprise CV-6 was the only US aircraft carrier to survive the entire Pacific war.

Shame to see this go.

^^ That alone is enough reason to keep it around. :nervous:
 
How to know you're a geek 3: You read the previous geek comments and thought "Well, at least that USS Enterprise actually appeared in a Star Trek film. Kinda. It was actually the USS Ranger, but they said it was the Enterprise.".


Oh cack.
 
Wait, what? Next you're going to tell me the transparent aluminum was fake, too...
 
^^ That alone is enough reason to keep it around. :nervous:

The name maybe the same but the ship I was talking about was sold for scrap 1st July 1958. Hence why I said CV6. This one that is about to be retired is CVN-65.

But I think the name should live on if they build another carrier in the future.
 
Last edited:
Well, at least I might get a chance to look at this before it goes to the giant harbor in the sky.
 
Hmmmm. The Nautilus is a museum. It was nuclear powered. The tour doesn't include the reactor spaces, though. If I'm not mistaken, it's the only nuclear-powered vessel open to the public in the world.

("Can you direct us to the naval base in Alameda? It's where they keep the nuclear wessels.")
 
The name maybe the same but the ship I was talking about was sold for scrap 1st July 1958. Hence why I said CV6. This was CVN-65.

But I think the name should live on if they build another carrier in the future.

There was a multi episode documentary about the original Enterprise on History. Mind boggling, how many battles that ship survived.
 
CVN-78.jpg


This fat lady is the one to succeed the Enterprise in the carrier fleet. The USS Gerald Ford.

Yes, this is a rendering. It's still under construction.
 
This old girl has been through it all, and still came out smelling like a rose.

:bowdown: To the "Big E CV-6" and it's many crewman / woman who have served time on it. Semper Fi 👍

It would be sweet to see it harbored at Pearl Harbor as a tourist attraction.

A nice little Wiki read.
 
This old girl has been through it all, and still came out smelling like a rose.

:bowdown: To the "Big E CV-6" and it's many crewman / woman who have served time on it. Semper Fi 👍

It would be sweet to see it harbored at Pearl Harbor as a tourist attraction.

A nice little Wiki read.

This isn't about that Enterprise...
 
Yeah, had he seen the entire article, about how that one was scrapped and where it's artifacts remain, he mighta figgered it out.

But with an Ohio State avatar, what can you expect??? :dopey:
 
R.I.P. USS Enterprise! Have lots of childhood memories from this ship. Had it as a small plastic model kit and it was always the aircraft carrier to me.
 
RIP USS Enterprise. Sad to see it go, hopefully the name will live on on a new carrier.

I loved learning about the big E on History channel's Battle 360°.
 
I remember being taken to Cairnryan in 1980=ish to see the Ark Royal (shown here on the left) being towed in to be scrapped. I remember thinking, "It's huge" yet, when you see it next to these monsters, The Mighty Ark wasn't really all that mighty...

745px-HMS_Ark_Royal_USS_Nimitz_Norfolk1_1978.jpeg

Yes, I know that's the Nimitz, but Big E was even longer...
 
Enterprise was the one where they just kept throwing small nuclear reactors at it until they had enough power rather than design bigger ones, right?
 
RIP USS Enterprise. Sad to see it go, hopefully the name will live on on a new carrier.

I loved learning about the big E on History channel's Battle 360°.

Not sure if...

But again. This isn't the WW2 Big E. It was scrapped in the fifties.
 
Enterprise was the one where they just kept throwing small nuclear reactors at it until they had enough power rather than design bigger ones, right?

I'd say something about redundancy, but the Navy is obsessed with multiple engines... that's why all USN carrier-based aircraft have at least two engines.
 
I'd rather have a carrier with two engines instead of just one in case of an engine failure of either engines.

A carrier is a juicy target and can't afford to let it be without paddles.
 
Redundancy is always good, but 8 nuclear reactors does seem a bit... excessive.

:lol:


Though with 50's design sensibilities, I suppose it makes sense.
 
It's a very rare sight to see any large military vessel with a single screw, I believe the Enterprise has four... though if it had four more screws, perhaps they could convert it into an amphibious VTOL. :D
 
Sad sad sad...

It probably could feasibly do another 50... pity they can't put them in a 'ship graveyard' where no degradation occurs...

Rest "Big E", you have earnt it.
 
Thank you for your service, U.S.S. Enterprise. Just so much respect for her & her crew.

This sounds like a near-tragedy, but I'm sure the Navy studied all options in attempt to save this particular ship. Damn shame. :indiff:
 
Back