gotSTANCE!?

  • Thread starter BoostedM3
  • 1,049 comments
  • 176,904 views
155726_10150129702284782_524079781_8044781_6120546_n.jpg

This is the strangest photo angle I've ever seen. Where's that front wheel running off to? It looks like an anteater licking the floor.
 
Ok... not to troll too much but here is a real life example of STANCE:

5225326708_bafeda9524_o.jpg


:drool::drool::drool:

STANCE is all about wheel gap, offset, etc...

Max negative camber just looks ridiculous IMHO...

Your overall photo composition would be sick if it wasn't so distracting with the negative camber...
Here is also another real life example of stance:
toyota-corolla.jpg
 
Not even worth mocking.... No clue at all... :dunce:
I do have a clue you moron. Making a car hellaflush or having that stupid "STANCE OMGZZZZ" bullspit is dumb. It just makes the car useless. Sure, run flush wheels, it looks cool, but "stance" is just how something sits, or how something stands, like a person.
 
I do have a clue you moron. Making a car hellaflush or having that stupid "STANCE OMGZZZZ" bullspit is dumb. It just makes the car useless. Sure, run flush wheels, it looks cool, but "stance" is just how something sits, or how something stands, like a person.


That whole hellaflush stance fad in a video game makes me laugh, its so ridiculous!
 
That's still zero camber on the rear axle itself. The wheel might have a very small amount of camber, but it's still 90 degrees to the axle. :P

I do have a clue you moron. Making a car hellaflush or having that stupid "STANCE OMGZZZZ" bullspit is dumb. It just makes the car useless. Sure, run flush wheels, it looks cool, but "stance" is just how something sits, or how something stands, like a person.

Again not trying to start a flame war... If you don't know what stance (it's an automotive car culture kind of thing... clearly you don't have any culture) is then please go to someone elses thread. If you noticed, I was trying to help someone out so that they realize that that kind of camber is useless as far as racing physics are concerned... The rest of the car / photo was pretty good.

I can appreciate F1, Formula D, hellaflush, VIP, and even NASCAR. You clearly don't have much of a clue about suspension setups (Beyond what a live rear axle is).

NASCAR uses a floating rear hub type assembly and they often run +/- 2 or more degrees of camber depending on the track, and on road courses you can clearly see that both front and rear are running negative camber setups. Maybe if you CONTRIBUTED you would actually learn something...

Just a thought.
 
"Hellaflush" is nothing more then a web site. It tends to feature cars with agressive camber setups, wheel poke etc.

"stanced" refers to how a car sits in relation to the wheels and the arches around it.

When you achive good stance, the wheels/tires should not sit too far in but rather sit "flush" with the car's fenders. getting the combination of offset, camber and tire stretch should see a car that sits low, have a wheel that is close in relation to the fender lip, and have some tire tuck.

Well thats how i see it lol.

Not necessarily. Any car can have stance. Making your wheels sit flush is just one way of doing it.

For example, this has stance:

wp_0011_1280.jpg


As does this:

DSC00597.jpg


And these:

4792459516_6ecb3c5ca4_bsh.jpg


IMG_0712.jpg


Even this has loads of stance about it.

40439_477009335808_125281815808_6428345_3302475_n.jpg


To me, stance is similar to presence :)

Anyway, we're kinda off topic a bit now. Here's some (almost)stance for you:

AutumnRingMini_2.jpg
 
Again not trying to start a flame war... If you don't know what stance (it's an automotive car culture kind of thing... clearly you don't have any culture) is then please go to someone elses thread. If you noticed, I was trying to help someone out so that they realize that that kind of camber is useless as far as racing physics are concerned... The rest of the car / photo was pretty good.

I can appreciate F1, Formula D, hellaflush, VIP, and even NASCAR. You clearly don't have much of a clue about suspension setups (Beyond what a live rear axle is).

NASCAR uses a floating rear hub type assembly and they often run +/- 2 or more degrees of camber depending on the track, and on road courses you can clearly see that both front and rear are running negative camber setups. Maybe if you CONTRIBUTED you would actually learn something...

Just a thought.
Whatever you say. :lol:

You act as if I don't have first hand experience working on NASCAR stockcars.
 
Not necessarily. Any car can have stance. Making your wheels sit flush is just one way of doing it.

For example, this has stance:


As does this:


And these:


Even this has loads of stance about it.


To me, stance is similar to presence :)



Agreed 👍


I was doing my best to stay "on" topic... Just wanted to point out that a car with stance (or presence - I'm going to use that again BTW) should definitely not have maximum "GT5" negative camber... IMO everything else about the OP's car was pretty smooth for a Fiat 500!
 
Whatever you say. :lol:

You act as if I don't have first hand experience working on NASCAR stockcars.

First hand experience working on NASCAR... posting in a gtplanet forum... and picking on random people's picutres...




Is it even worth responding to?

:banghead:


Oh and here is an example of how they (read: NASCAR) get plenty of negative camber on the rear axle:

file.php
 
You do realize there's more to NASCAR than just the Sprint Cup, Nationwide, and Camping World Truck series', right?
Our car is the one in the BG, in the middle with the black nose and yellow fenders.
34698_479379659257_526594257_6828859_2887775_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
You do realize there's more to NASCAR than just the Sprint Cup, Nationwide, and Camping World Truck series', right?

Ummmm yes. You do realize there's more to cars than v8's and solid rear axles right?

Look, not trying to insult, but you leave a lot of negative comments and back up some of your statements with bogus facts. I live in central Ohio and see plenty of all types of racing and have at least second hand knowledge from the people that do it. I personally race SCCA solo II and have worked on automobiles since I could hold a tool. I was also taught to play well with others and stick up for those that are being picked on.

My point is that this is a forum and, while I'm not a moderator, the idea is to contribute and if you have an opinion - go ahead and share it - but do so with a little respect (especially if its not your "thing").

EDIT: I believe that is the All American series - right?
 
All-American Street Stocks. We've also got a Ministock too.

This might be a stretch, but at the grassroots level this whole stance, drifting, whatever thing actually employs a lot of the junk yard / DIY ingenuity that you guys use every weekend.

Like you, I just don't always get it... But hey, after all it is just a game.
 
Skyline has stance..

My GTR has serious stance

Kyoto-Gion_1.jpg


Kyoto-Gion_3.jpg


If I could make the wheels just a couple inches bigger it would actually be evil and banned by the church in America.

Edit: And there's still a few mm to go down in the settings..
 
Not necessarily. Any car can have stance. Making your wheels sit flush is just one way of doing it.

For example, this has stance:

wp_0011_1280.jpg


As does this:

DSC00597.jpg


And these:

4792459516_6ecb3c5ca4_bsh.jpg


IMG_0712.jpg


Even this has loads of stance about it.

40439_477009335808_125281815808_6428345_3302475_n.jpg


To me, stance is similar to presence :)

Anyway, we're kinda off topic a bit now. Here's some (almost)stance for you:

AutumnRingMini_2.jpg

What he said ^^

Wheels don't have to have 'poke' to be stanced. They can have 'tuck' also.











Ahrweiler-TownSquare.jpg


And a cheeky real life 1 of my ride

DSC00694.jpg
 
I don't get the 'stance' crap, 'Stance' is just a term used, it's not even the correct term. Stance is such a vague word that someone saying my car has 'stance' can be taken in plenty of ways. Every car has stance. What KIND of stance is the difference. So maybe this thread should be, got 'Tucked' stance? Or something along those lines. Not everyone is going to get it when they see 'gotstance'.
 
I don't get the 'stance' crap, 'Stance' is just a term used, it's not even the correct term. Stance is such a vague word that someone saying my car has 'stance' can be taken in plenty of ways. Every car has stance. What KIND of stance is the difference. So maybe this thread should be, got 'Tucked' stance? Or something along those lines. Not everyone is going to get it when they see 'gotstance'.

I think it's safe to say if you know what the title means you know what's in this thread, if you don't know, you can figure it out
 
Back