- 324
- tripleseven777
Your overall photo composition would be sick if it wasn't so distracting with the negative camber...
Yeah I know.
Your overall photo composition would be sick if it wasn't so distracting with the negative camber...
Here is also another real life example of stance:Ok... not to troll too much but here is a real life example of STANCE:
![]()
STANCE is all about wheel gap, offset, etc...
Max negative camber just looks ridiculous IMHO...
Your overall photo composition would be sick if it wasn't so distracting with the negative camber...
Here is also another real life example of stance:
corolla.jpg
Here is also another real life example of stance:
I do have a clue you moron. Making a car hellaflush or having that stupid "STANCE OMGZZZZ" bullspit is dumb. It just makes the car useless. Sure, run flush wheels, it looks cool, but "stance" is just how something sits, or how something stands, like a person.Not even worth mocking.... No clue at all...![]()
I do have a clue you moron. Making a car hellaflush or having that stupid "STANCE OMGZZZZ" bullspit is dumb. It just makes the car useless. Sure, run flush wheels, it looks cool, but "stance" is just how something sits, or how something stands, like a person.
That's still zero camber on the rear axle itself. The wheel might have a very small amount of camber, but it's still 90 degrees to the axle.![]()
I do have a clue you moron. Making a car hellaflush or having that stupid "STANCE OMGZZZZ" bullspit is dumb. It just makes the car useless. Sure, run flush wheels, it looks cool, but "stance" is just how something sits, or how something stands, like a person.
"Hellaflush" is nothing more then a web site. It tends to feature cars with agressive camber setups, wheel poke etc.
"stanced" refers to how a car sits in relation to the wheels and the arches around it.
When you achive good stance, the wheels/tires should not sit too far in but rather sit "flush" with the car's fenders. getting the combination of offset, camber and tire stretch should see a car that sits low, have a wheel that is close in relation to the fender lip, and have some tire tuck.
Well thats how i see it lol.
Whatever you say.Again not trying to start a flame war... If you don't know what stance (it's an automotive car culture kind of thing... clearly you don't have any culture) is then please go to someone elses thread. If you noticed, I was trying to help someone out so that they realize that that kind of camber is useless as far as racing physics are concerned... The rest of the car / photo was pretty good.
I can appreciate F1, Formula D, hellaflush, VIP, and even NASCAR. You clearly don't have much of a clue about suspension setups (Beyond what a live rear axle is).
NASCAR uses a floating rear hub type assembly and they often run +/- 2 or more degrees of camber depending on the track, and on road courses you can clearly see that both front and rear are running negative camber setups. Maybe if you CONTRIBUTED you would actually learn something...
Just a thought.
Not necessarily. Any car can have stance. Making your wheels sit flush is just one way of doing it.
For example, this has stance:
As does this:
And these:
Even this has loads of stance about it.
To me, stance is similar to presence![]()
Whatever you say.
You act as if I don't have first hand experience working on NASCAR stockcars.
You do realize there's more to NASCAR than just the Sprint Cup, Nationwide, and Camping World Truck series', right?
All-American Street Stocks. We've also got a Ministock too.
What happened to this thread?! I thought it was about stanced out cars, not about ****** nascars?!
Yay ignorant Europeans!What happened to this thread?! I thought it was about stanced out cars, not about ****** nascars?!
This is the strangest photo angle I've ever seen. Where's that front wheel running off to? It looks like an anteater licking the floor.
Not necessarily. Any car can have stance. Making your wheels sit flush is just one way of doing it.
For example, this has stance:
![]()
As does this:
![]()
And these:
![]()
![]()
Even this has loads of stance about it.
![]()
To me, stance is similar to presence
Anyway, we're kinda off topic a bit now. Here's some (almost)stance for you:
![]()
I don't get the 'stance' crap, 'Stance' is just a term used, it's not even the correct term. Stance is such a vague word that someone saying my car has 'stance' can be taken in plenty of ways. Every car has stance. What KIND of stance is the difference. So maybe this thread should be, got 'Tucked' stance? Or something along those lines. Not everyone is going to get it when they see 'gotstance'.
just a quick attempt.
![]()