Or maybe because, Mr Premium, I don't consider TDU to be all that and a bag of popcorn. Nor do I see a whole ton of people thinking likewise in comparison to games like Forza.Ew?
Oh, I get it...because it's not Gran Turismo he's looking forward to.
Eh, I was out of line with my TDU sniping. If people like it, that's their business, not mine. Ermm... I been sick -which is true. But I should read my post before I post it.The first TDU (though not realistic) was freaking amazind, so if they can trump it with TDU2, then it's a buy for me.
Vision Gran Turismo was shown at E3 2005, so clearly even before then they were working on it. This turned into GTHD the following year, and the plan was to continue down that path and release that as a full game, essentially GT4 in High Def. That was scrapped in favour of developing the full GT5 that we know and love (hate?!) today, building the engine from scratch almost. GT5 Prologue being the first real replacement for GTHD.Like someone said earlier though, if Polyphony Dont give a date at the E3 they will become a laughing stock amongst a majority of people who follow the game and other game developers.
And the press my goodness dont get me started on those people , they will eat away at Polyphony. I also want to mention that to me personally am Iam a huge GT fan but I am extremely skeptical whether a game can actually be worth 6 years of production and ongoing. There is only so much you can do in a game and I dont think the game will look like it took 6 or how ever many more years to make. This in turn will be the main point of bias with reviewers and you know what happends reviewers give **** scores 6-7's/10 people DO look at reviews and decide if its a buy or not. Sure you can say that no one takes reviews seriously, no fans of a series dont, but most other people who dont know much about games buy on the word of mouth and review scores in general.
Also after GT PSP I have serious worries as to how long actually was spent on this game, I personally think when GT5 Prologue came out that was it there was nothing else to the game at the time, so you can really say they have just been lazy, slow and have simply exposed the game way to early (Yamauchi was talking about it back in 2003....) I think the games been in development for no more than 2.5 years.
I didn't say it was anything else - I simply mentioned it because it was part of the development cycle going from GT4 to GT5 to show that the game HAS been in development all those years in some form or other.On a side note GT: Vision at E3 in 2005 was just simply GT4 with the graphics turned up and 1080p.
Right, but the difference with GTPSP is that we were shown a tech-demo, and then nothing was heard of it for years. At least with GT5 you can see the progression from Vision GT > GTHD > GT5 Prologue > GT5. The development path has not been linear that's for sure, and a few changes in direction are the reason why it has taken so long. Personally, I would have been happy with the Prologue engine with more tracks and more cars, but I'm sure that hindsight will show that it will have been worth the wait when GT5 finally lands.Of course I dont doubt it, but the issue that bugs me though is that GT PSP was said the same thing of, we were shown 2 or 3 screenshots of it back in 2004 yet in all honesty I dont think development started until mid 2008.
Are sales ever lost due to prolonged release date??
Are sales ever lost due to disappointment in the product by consumers??
HD takes crazy time to make.
Are sales ever lost due to prolonged release date??
Are sales ever lost due to disappointment in the product by consumers??
Answer two questions and it's not hard to tell why PD does not care for announcing a release date, the game is not ready. 5 years is not long, HD takes crazy time to make.
You can't be worse than Duke Nukem Forever. Unlike 3D Realms, Polophony Digital has credibility.
You can't be worse than Duke Nukem Forever. Unlike 3D Realms, Polophony Digital has credibility.