- 2,011

- UK
I doubt they lose any sleep when we complain about anything. 👍I know its their game. And they make the calls.
But they then have to deal with people complain about it.
I doubt they lose any sleep when we complain about anything. 👍I know its their game. And they make the calls.
But they then have to deal with people complain about it.
There's plenty of glaring omissions in the game. The C5 'Vette, the DC5 Integra, the FTO just to name a few. Anyone could keep going on until it drove them completely insane - but really, what's the point?But you have to admit not having a single BMW m5 model or Audi rs model is beyond strange.
There's plenty of glaring omissions in the game. The C5 'Vette, the DC5 Integra, the FTO just to name a few. Anyone could keep going on until it drove them completely insane - but really, what's the point?
No amount of requesting or wishlisting is actually going to affect PD's production in any way, otherwise every update since launch would've been an assortment of modern supercars and GT3s instead of stuff like the Hiace and Alphard. I think at some point, you've just gotta learn to go with the flow.
You should probably look here:No amount of requesting or wishlisting is actually going to affect PD's production in any way
I think a lot of cars we want will be hold of until the next gt releases.
Kazunori YamauchiI think nowadays we are no longer in the era where you hold on to the new cars and tracks that you create for the next title, and you save it all for your release. I don’t think we work that way any more. Now it is sort of like being on Spotify or the iTunes Store; I think it is more natural to have new additional cars and tracks added to the store as they are ready to go.
I don't see the connection...For a game quite heavily focused on pushing the competitive aspect it's rather embarrassing just how out-of-date most Gr. 1, 2, 3 and 4 lineups are.
You should probably look here:
See, if people used the tools and resources provided to them (and that we keep trying to guide them towards), rather than mind-barfing their dumb little "where's x/y/z?" posts everywhere, they might get somewhere...
I really hate to be dismissive, but I don't think the contents of that subforum have been relevant since 2014.You should probably look here:
See, if people used the tools and resources provided to them (and that we keep trying to guide them towards), rather than mind-barfing their dumb little "where's x/y/z?" posts everywhere, they might get somewhere...
And with good reason. More than 10% of the additional cars that have arrived in GT7 are on page one...You could argue that a lot of the cars at the top of the list have arrived in the game since then
You may not doubt it. I do.They are no doubt holding back content.
If visibility is the problem, there's no need to look any further than the replies of every single tweet from the official GT account or Kaz's personal account.And with good reason. More than 10% of the additional cars that have arrived in GT7 are on page one...
A lot have been there... a while, but they don't get up there in the first place if people don't vote on them.
If I had a quid for every time someone's posted a dumb wishlist or "where's my x/y/z?" car that they really care about for some reason and yet not bothered to suggest it or vote for it, I could have bought Twitter.
Yes, the thing that Kaz mentioned as something that seemed to annoy him in a 2023 interview I referenced yesterday in the actual update thread...If visibility is the problem, there's no need to look any further than the replies of every single tweet from the official GT account or Kaz's personal account.
Seems like poor marketing to me!
Which, by the same logic, means he surely wouldn't be too fond of a subforum dedicated to requesting cars to be added to the game.Yes, the thing that Kaz mentioned as something that seemed to annoy him in a 2023 interview I referenced two days ago.
That's not the same logic at all. Responses of "where's my [car I really care about]" to a content Tweet are not an appropriate place.Which, by the same logic, means he surely wouldn't be too fond of a subforum dedicated to requesting cars to be added to the game.
There is the sprinkling of some truth to the theory that PD actually visits and reads these threads??The subforums are an appropriate, and organised, place - that they originally asked us to set up...
I don't actually know how anyone can even doubt it, given how obvious it is that of course they would and how many times I've confirmed it.There is the sprinkling of some truth to the theory that PD actually visits and reads these threads??
I do try to read each post you submit but I have missed many over the years I've been here...I don't actually know how anyone can even doubt it, given how obvious it is that of course they would and how many times I've confirmed it.
Well, there 87,000 of the bastards so that's understandable.I do try to read each post you submit but I have missed many over the years I've been here...
It's more nuanced than that. The core issue that causes the constant GT3 request problem is there's very little synergy between the singleplayer and the multiplayer in this game.Why should be always super cars or GT3 cars?? There are literally a dozen of racing games/sims with that content, if GT has been different ll these years us because of variety and let people play/drive/race with regular cars and affordable sport vehicles🤷♂️
Has an actual PD employee confirmed this at any point or are we running off of vibes here?I don't actually know how anyone can even doubt it, given how obvious it is that of course they would and how many times I've confirmed it.
Are you seriously asking this of the site administrator and editor?Has an actual PD employee confirmed this at any point or are we running off of vibes here?
Well, there 87,000 of the bastards so that's understandable.
I'll take your word for it!Are you seriously asking this of the site administrator and editor?
I've seen it in person, I've seen it in the site traffic, I've had the conversations in person, on the phone, and by email, some literally have accounts here, they asked us to set up the Suggestions and Kaz Q&A forum (which... 😬)...
It's not "vibes" or theory or supposition. PD and SIE employees read this site. Not likely just this site either - it'd be just as insane for them not to read anywhere that the community assembles as it would be not to read this one - but I can't speak as to others.
This would of course be the most important thing, but if they were to be someone outside PD, i'd say the biggest value would be actually willing to be more transparent and actually hearing the community (which i don't think anyone in there wants to) , plus understanding why people still love the old GT games and keep going back at them (again, something that i'm not sure they understand).Someone would have to have a ton of knowledge and familiar with PD and it's staff.
If GT has anything it's variety. Putting a M5 in there would't bring more variety - putting in a tractor would.
Just use a different word to say you really want a M5 man.
You really don't need to take two looks at the community to figure out why that can very well be the case. No matter what they do, a good three quarters of people will still whine and bicker about it. In their position I would have called it quits with free updates years ago as it's pearls before swine anyway.Sometimes i feel like they slowly started to straight up despise their own community, but maybe that's too much overthinking of me. 😃