- 1,521
- Seixal
- zefthebestofcour
One more to go.
Great!!! And thank you a million times!! Finally with spreadsheet!!!! PRiceless value! ))) Great show !! You´ve set fire to the Moon! Dude!
One more to go.
Big problem with BoP is that it changes all the time, this is the reason why I did tests of MPG on cars at stock settings with gearbox set at same value for all cars in same group... 1% in power change can make car faster on some tracks, on other slower... Same goes fo wieght, and sadly it changes all the time.
On other side, every car is individual for a player, so maybe some tailhappy cars are better for some, for other not...
Cheers...
Yeah I know, just saying...Non-BoP values aren't meaningful though if we're assessing the balance of the game
https://www.gtplanet.net/forum/threads/gran-turismo-sport-fuel-consumption-list-tire-usage.372334/I will be adding fuel economy to the list next.
That test is with the AI driving with different power and weight than the BoP.
Thanks Wind of fire! Your re burning rubber.... (and tarmac) man! Great job! A billion thanks!The Group 4 BoP test is now complete.
The Porsche Cayman is a terrible car. What a shocker.
The Cayman is a wonderful car to drive, but it transmission is shocking.It does´nt deserve such stats on any racing game... It´s a shame that Poliphony is doing this to this car (setting it to garbage status!!!!)
Wich is stupid, they could let BoP on, but make setting up car availale. What's the point of having 6 gears (cayman) but being able to use 3 or 4 only... And there are many other cars that have similar problems to this...The Cayman is a wonderful car to drive, but it transmission is shocking.
Wich is stupid, they could let BoP on, but make setting up car availale. What's the point of having 6 gears (cayman) but being able to use 3 or 4 only... And there are many other cars that have similar problems to this...
But that goes against what Group 4 cars are allowed to do in real world competition.
All cars are test driven by the FIA and then modified so that they all have near identical performance levels. Once a car has been approved by the FIA, it cannot be modified by the teams, eliminating continual development costs for constructors. The GT 4 (GR 4) class should maintain that for online competition. I would like to see a little suspension or even camber/toe tuning allowed (same at GT4) but that's it.
I have the Cayman in my garage but never driven it. Probably the only place I can even try it is Willow Springs. I saw one win an FIA race there once. True story!It does´nt deserve such stats on any racing game... It´s a shame that Poliphony is doing this to this car (setting it to garbage status!!!!)
The oddball nature of blue moon is just right for the 86.I'm surprised the 86 didn't do better. It absolutely dominates the Gr4 category on Bluemoon Infield in the top lobbies.
I'm surprised you didn't test in Brands Hatch, considering that it's a significant test track and a reference in GT Sport. May I suggest that you add Brands Hatch to the test?In the not to distant furture I am going to do a major update to the BoP test.
I can help you, you test them I update the sheet for you (just send me the picture and I input the data, the most tedious part). In the interest of rigurosity and academic research, it would be very interesting that you did it in the same tracks as Tidgney RacingIn the not to distant furture I am going to do a major update to the BoP test.
Don't say you are from Arizona, say the state beside...I am kind of shocked that the huracan is only 12th overall according to this test. I was expecting top 8 at the worst case. My other gripe was regarding the 650s being near the bottom of the overall times. These two would be my choices for the fia manufacturers cup but sadly i cant enter it because of my arizona residency.