For the most part, ps4 exclusives are single player games. Personally, I think Naughty Dogg games are best for their single player content.
Nope. For the most part they have large on-line components as well
Nor does it need to be first party titles to push up PS+ numbers, why not COD or FIFA?
GTS is a vastly online ps4 exclusive which require a ps plus membership. More GTS sales does mean more Ps plus subscribers in addition to the multiplatform online gamers.
I didn't say that no one would have done so (which is how you have chosen to read it, but that we have no direct numbers to tell us how large or widespread the trends was (fell free to provide them if you have them).
I actually used a singular example from each side of that view to show that a sole anecdotal example can't be used to extrapolate a trend in either direction.
As such stop quote mining my posts and attempting to attach meaning to them that they clearly do not have, its deeply missleading.
No, it is not about value although it could be. I think you misunderstood;
and please make your argument clear if you have one.
The points quite clear, sales volumes do not indicate a products quality.
Is a Ford Fiesta a better product than a Rolls Royce?
likes on ps4 as of today
Pcars2 ----------------4.5k
Unless GTS and PC2 were only sold digitally via PSN then i tells us nothing on its own.
Even then without total sales figures for both for sales on PSN its still tells us very, very little.
The sales numbers tell more than how many sold.
Nope. Other data would be needed to do that.
It tells what the majority of racers on the ps4 want.
No it doesn't. And to show other wise your going to need to prove that.
User activity in titles tells us far more about what people want from a title, as it lets us know exactly how they play it and to what degree.
I could just as easily argue that the initial sales figures being well below GT5, 4 and 3 indicate that its not what the majority of racers want. However I'm not daft enough to believe that sales figures alone can provide that information!
However you would first need to define 'racer' as that's going to vary from person to person.
this means more than anything including your personal preferences because ones personal preferences does not represent the majority. Scaff I hope you finally realize this.
Oh the deep seated irony.
I'm not the one quote mining people, presenting data that doesn't support the assumptions you have made and making unsupported claims.
