GT Sport Undocumented Changes Thread (1.40)

[George Jakob]

Perhaps. But do you really think it's worth keeping? Does it deviate that much mechanically or stylistically? If they could put it into N500 that'd be great - either in this game or the next. It's strange that if it's in Gr.X due to an unclassified engine, how come it still how a power figure? Why not just go off of that regarding the categorization? I'm sure that if any essential stats were truly missing, PD could just call up Calty and ask them to provide some metrics.

Yes i do beliave its worth of staying imo.

 

[MIE1992]

Yes i do beliave its worth of staying imo.

Then hopefully they can provide some weight stats or something - whatever it'd need to be in the N-series.

 

[George Jakob]

Then hopefully they can provide some weight stats or something - whatever it'd need to be in the N-series.

I want a better system for road cars in general.

 

[MIE1992]

I want a better system for road cars in general.

You don't think the idea of "sub-classes" could work? I think it could, where the N-series system stays, but most events would limit players to a specific selection of cars within an N-series class. For example, an N100 race that limits players to kei cars. And when BoP is on but settings are disabled, I'd also prohibit "inter-class cars" - like how some N300 cars can go into N400 or N200, and so on - unless settings were enabled, either for all possible settings, or that particular section of tuning.

 

[George Jakob]

You don't think the idea of "sub-classes" could work? I think it could, where the N-series system stays, but most events would limit players to a specific selection of cars within an N-series class. For example, an N100 race that limits players to kei cars. And when BoP is on but settings are disabled, I'd also prohibit "inter-class cars" - like how some N300 cars can go into N400 or N200, and so on - unless settings were enabled, either for all possible settings, or that particular section of tuning.

I would prefer a better PP system to be honest.

 

[talhaONE]

Well they did the right choice technically since the FT-1 is a concept car.

Rx500, Sfr racing Concept and Miura bertone prototype are concept too but they belong to N class. Ft-1 should belong to n500 not gr.x.

 

[KayX23]

Guess it's Group X because you cannot tune it

 

[andrewhake]

Open top = full lod model
Closed top = lower lod models

This isn't true at all. This isn't how it works at all. The car has had full highly detailed subdividable model since it was added to GT Sport.

 

[emula]

This isn't true at all. This isn't how it works at all. The car has had full highly detailed subdividable model since it was added to GT Sport.

I was talking about the Mazda NA Roadster. The only full lod model is the open top one that you can see in scape mode and in the livery editor. The ingame model and the photomode on track model (both closed top) aren't at full lod

 

[George Jakob]

Rx500, Sfr racing Concept and Miura bertone prototype are concept too but they belong to N class. Ft-1 should belong to n500 not gr.x.

Those should go in group X too like it or not (besides the Miura because its a car that went into production ) thats according to thair (PD's ) ideal system not mine.

 

[PettyWingman]

Goddamn PD and Toyota forever for making this Gr.X and not N500 as shown.

They probably didnt like the FT1 taking on the A90...

It's not the correct thread to talk about it, but here's my opinion...

It was categorized into Gr.X because its spec is COMPLETELY UNKNOWN ON THE SURFACE. (Shown like "---PS")
Maybe the cars in GTS can't be categorized into Gr.N without a clear spec.

 

[talhaONE]

It's not the correct thread to talk about it, but here's my opinion...

was categorized into Gr.X because its spec is COMPLETELY UNKNOWN ON THE SURFACE. (Shown like "---PS")
The cars can't be categorized into Gr.N without a clear spec.

Its stats are clear actually. If you try to enter a open lobby race with regulations less then the car stats you will see car is 486hp and 1320kg. So they are not unclear they are just hidden.

Same trick also works for Lm55 VGT which is 791hp and 830kg.

 

[PettyWingman]

Its stats are clear actually. If you try to enter a open lobby race with regulations less then the car stats you will see car is 486hp and 1320kg. So they are not unclear they are just hidden.

Same trick also works for Lm55 VGT which is 791hp and 830kg.

Yup, I know it can be revealed, but it's kept secret.

Besides, FT-1 can't be tuned at all, except the tires, TCS and brake balance.
I think it's one of the reasons.

 

[TonyJZX]

The FT1 was supposed to be N500... they released the after teaser pics showing that. Be that as it may its a part of their history they dont want to rehash so I feel it'll disappear after this era. I would guess N500 is optimistic.

The cliffnotes is that the FT1 was supposed to be the new Supra... it was released as a static mockup back in 2014 and I'm not sure they ever had a running example... ie. never had an engine or gearbox mounted. Toyota did their sums and after the Subaru BRZ partnership they decided to go with BMW for the A90 Supra.

So therefore the FT1 is at best, an evolutionary dead end that is an interesting footnote in Toyota history but that's it. I'm sure Toyota would love for us to forget the FT1 ever existed and just focus on the BMW Supra.