Scaff
Moderator
- 29,398
- He/Him
- ScaffUK
I personally don't have an issue with a title being reviewed in the form that most users will experience it, I have far more of an issue with review embargo's that are set to the games day of release.@Rallywagon Mass Effect Andromeda is in horribly un-optimised state on all platforms, and they (huge EA) will just leave it there! Well lets hope smaller teams with smaller publisher will not cut costs and run like that as well.
Like demands being placed on journalist that they must not review at any cost without D1P!!! (in fact at a cost of being banned from any further cooperation with SMS or Bandai).
It also tends to be the smaller studios that support titles on an ongoing basis (at least in the racing arena). AC and PCars were both well supported in that regard from launch, while the likes of Codemasters and EA failing at this to a great degree. Of the larger studios it tends to only be the MS and Sony run ones that support racing titles post launch well (Forza, DC and GT).
Its also worth noting that breaking review embargo's and facing potential sanctions is not unique to any one publisher, and far more of an issue for the very large ones if the embargo is set to release date, as for example GT5 and GT6 were. It will be interesting to see what date we get GTS reviews in the wild and if anyone will break that embargo.
Last edited: