- 23,800
- Philippines
chinkoif you really think games are about graphics then go ahead and bum the x-box. it could have ps1 graphics, but if it was enjoyable to play who would care?
Which is why I went and stole my cousin's PS1 after I finished GT3 to play GT2 again.
GilAs stated the graphics don't make the game.
I will go on record as saying that I'Ve found GT2 to be more entertaining in lots of ways than GT 3.
I will also go on record as the one small voice saying that I often get more enjoyment in GT 4 out of "managing" my garage than actually racing.
I hope for GT5 that someone at PD will go back and look at GT2, and give us the "info blurb" that was available in the garage to sort of outline the history of the selected car.
I no longer care if I get the "classic" tracks. I can always go back and run them in the old games.
Actually, I like GT4 quite a bit more than GT3. I agree that GT3 was a relatively sterile experience compared to the looser dynamics and honesty of the GT2 installment, but I think the added realism (and consequent high speed instability, greater understeer, oversteer and brake dive and more difficult control) of GT4 makes up for the lack in GT3. In GT3 you can muscle cars around that you technically shouldn't. GT4 rectifies this.
Yes on the info blurb! I think that's something EVERYONE wants back!