GT6 Drag race "Sleepers"???

8181839Capture.PNG
 
Lol, there's no hacks in GT6. Just do a quick google search for any popular hacking website and they're still chatting about money glitches.
 
That Alfa Romeo TZ3 is insane...


1200 horsepower and you can also put NOS on it. I've even beaten fully-modded(and nitrous equipped) Huayra's and Corvettes both through the 1/4 mile and up to 3000m on SSRX.
 
Lol, there's no hacks in GT6. Just do a quick google search for any popular hacking website and they're still chatting about money glitches.

Just because you haven't seen any hacks online doesn't mean there aren't any. Other websites I've searched online show evidence of hackers with jailbroken PS3s that have managed to crack into & modify the code, changing game payouts and parts on cars. Hybrid cars are only soon to follow if they allow gifting cars, which may be the reason they haven't enabled it yet.
 
That hasn't been confirmed, and doesn't really sound realistic at all. A car with 400 horsepower or lower, running a 400 shot of nitrous? The same shot an 800 horsepower V8 is limited to. Unless the car is specifically built to handle that much, you can't just casually spray 400 horsepower into a 4 cylinder and not expect it to explode. More realistically, 100% shot would resemble a 200-250 shot or close to it, while 50% is 100 or 125.
Try taking a Mitsubishi Evo 1 at 100%, I was destroying 900 hp skylines and supras with it. You'll see how the shot is. Also watch this
 
First off, my story isn't misleading, go and try this car if you don't believe me, you just have to get the transmission right. Also, most 4WD cars that get around 400-600 hp should have a 100% injection quantity, which effectively doubles your power. This does mean that a lot of cars, including the Hyundai Clix develop northward of 900 hp when on NOS. This means that when you have a good transmission setup, you will be able to break 9 seconds. Evos and STIs can both manage low 9s/high 8s on NOS, and they're a lot heavier than the Clix.
 
First off, my story isn't misleading, go and try this car if you don't believe me, you just have to get the transmission right. Also, most 4WD cars that get around 400-600 hp should have a 100% injection quantity, which effectively doubles your power. This does mean that a lot of cars, including the Hyundai Clix develop northward of 900 hp when on NOS. This means that when you have a good transmission setup, you will be able to break 9 seconds. Evos and STIs can both manage low 9s/high 8s on NOS, and they're a lot heavier than the Clix.

Good lord now this is annoying me, there's no proof. Don't say something unless there is 100% hard evidence that it IS true. I was being nice at first but now you're just being ignorant. I mean seriously.
 
Good lord now this is annoying me, there's no proof. Don't say something unless there is 100% hard evidence that it IS true. I was being nice at first but now you're just being ignorant. I mean seriously.
May I direct you to THE PROOF I put in the other thread
 
First off, my story isn't misleading, go and try this car if you don't believe me, you just have to get the transmission right. Also, most 4WD cars that get around 400-600 hp should have a 100% injection quantity, which effectively doubles your power. This does mean that a lot of cars, including the Hyundai Clix develop northward of 900 hp when on NOS. This means that when you have a good transmission setup, you will be able to break 9 seconds. Evos and STIs can both manage low 9s/high 8s on NOS, and they're a lot heavier than the Clix.
Cool story again, but you're telling people misleading information not approved by cia, fbi and pd.
 
Test the Clix, not the nitrous variable.
I suggest you look at the video you posted as "proof" too. Especially the part in which he runs out of nitrous. Look at how quickly he gets to 190 mph. With what 490 bhp? With 880 bhp he should be flying towards that and flying past it, which he is not. Why he is beating moat cars in that video, listen to it. The guys he runs keep letting go of the gas

If the video says that it doubles the power, doesn't mean it does.
 
I suggest you look at the video you posted as "proof" too. Especially the part in which he runs out of nitrous. Look at how quickly he gets to 190 mph. With what 490 bhp? With 880 bhp he should be flying towards that and flying past it, which he is not. Why he is beating moat cars in that video, listen to it. The guys he runs keep letting go of the gas

If the video says that it doubles the power, doesn't mean it does.
I dont have a capture card or good camera, so I couldn't post a video of my own. Also, I did concur with the evidence supplied to me if you look in the other thread, where we were talking about this. Before you attack my older posts, be sure to check if I've changed my standpoint, and attempted to cease the arguement.
 
Although I can't win in this car, I can keep up with the fastest cars using draft and nos, which does surprise most people.

Honda CRX (1989, I believe?), 326HP something like 800kg, with 100% NOS shot. I did 300+mph on a draft with nos. I was astounded that I could reach such high speeds in a CRX. Kept up with GT-R's and Supras.

Also, I haven't geared it yet, but I just bought an Autobachs Garaiya that makes 325HP with only 700kg, 100% shot of nos. Should prove to be faster than the CRX, depending on it's aerodynamics.

Other "sleeper" type cars I have used (I consider any lesser-known or less-popular vehicle that is fast to be a sleeper)

McClaren MP4-12C - Smokes anything up to about 250mph, then aerodynamics kick in. Launches have insane grip for a MR car and seem to be on-par with any AWD vehicle.

Bentley Speed 12 - Launches suck, but after launching expect to fly past everyone until the downforce kicks in.

Mercedes SL65AMG - Heavy vehicle with tons of torque and great aerodynamics. I set my top speed record in this car at 337mph, on a draft of course. It will do 294mph without nos or drafting.

RUF CTR2 - This thing is an AWD beast. I call it my GT-R killer.

Tommy Kaira ZZII - Another AWD beast. This car and the CTR2 are pretty close in terms of performance.

Lamborghini Diablo GT - Good aerodynamics, good launches, and will keep up with the best of them.

Mitsubishi GTO Twin Turbo - This is another GT-R killer but suffers from poor aerodynamics. High speeds over 250mph are hard for this car to hold.

Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo - This car would fare much better if it had better aerodynamics. It will still hold it's own against other cars to roughly 200mph.
 
Although I can't win in this car, I can keep up with the fastest cars using draft and nos, which does surprise most people.

Honda CRX (1989, I believe?), 326HP something like 800kg, with 100% NOS shot. I did 300+mph on a draft with nos. I was astounded that I could reach such high speeds in a CRX. Kept up with GT-R's and Supras.

Also, I haven't geared it yet, but I just bought an Autobachs Garaiya that makes 325HP with only 700kg, 100% shot of nos. Should prove to be faster than the CRX, depending on it's aerodynamics.

Other "sleeper" type cars I have used (I consider any lesser-known or less-popular vehicle that is fast to be a sleeper)

McClaren MP4-12C - Smokes anything up to about 250mph, then aerodynamics kick in. Launches have insane grip for a MR car and seem to be on-par with any AWD vehicle.

Bentley Speed 12 - Launches suck, but after launching expect to fly past everyone until the downforce kicks in.

Mercedes SL65AMG - Heavy vehicle with tons of torque and great aerodynamics. I set my top speed record in this car at 337mph, on a draft of course. It will do 294mph without nos or drafting.

RUF CTR2 - This thing is an AWD beast. I call it my GT-R killer.

Tommy Kaira ZZII - Another AWD beast. This car and the CTR2 are pretty close in terms of performance.

Lamborghini Diablo GT - Good aerodynamics, good launches, and will keep up with the best of them.

Mitsubishi GTO Twin Turbo - This is another GT-R killer but suffers from poor aerodynamics. High speeds over 250mph are hard for this car to hold.

Nissan 300ZX Twin Turbo - This car would fare much better if it had better aerodynamics. It will still hold it's own against other cars to roughly 200mph.

Most of these are commonly used drag cars. I dont see the Autobacs or Bentley often, but everything else is usually on the track at one point or another at Indy. They might be uncommon for 3k but I don't do that, so I wouldn't know.
 
Most of these are commonly used drag cars. I dont see the Autobacs or Bentley often, but everything else is usually on the track at one point or another at Indy. They might be uncommon for 3k but I don't do that, so I wouldn't know.

All I ever see in drag rooms are:

1: Huayra, hands down the most used car
2: GT-R
3: Veyron
4: One-77
5: FXX

I rarely see any other cars being used for drag racing. Therefore I consider these cars I listed as unpopular.
 
It's basic math people...it's not hard to figure out how much power you can get out of NOS. My Taurus had around 410hp fully tuned with full 70% injection and it worked out to be about 750hp.

You literally take the injection percentage, convert it to a decimal, then multiply that by your current horsepower. Not difficult...
 
It's basic math people...it's not hard to figure out how much power you can get out of NOS. My Taurus had around 410hp fully tuned with full 70% injection and it worked out to be about 750hp.

You literally take the injection percentage, convert it to a decimal, then multiply that by your current horsepower. Not difficult...
The problem with that, Slash, is that it's not based on the horsepower of the car. KT and I have already tested it on a low horsepower car and it turns out that 100% nitrous doesn't mean double horsepower. The test car outran the bench car by over 5 lengths; test car being at 50% engine limiting & 100% nitrous, and bench car being 100% horsepower. I figured maybe the engine limiter doesn't affect nitrous, so I removed parts to half the horsepower of the bench car and tried again with 100% nitrous - same turnout. We also ran the test with racing tires & automatic stock transmissions, so driver error would not play a role. From our testing, 50% nitrous is around a 125 shot, and 100% is obviously double that.
 
I'm not saying it doubles the horsepower. All I'm saying is that's how you figure out how much you've increased your horsepower. Doubling it is not true. 410 horsepower doubled would be over 800. It wasn't even close.
 
I'm not saying it doubles the horsepower. All I'm saying is that's how you figure out how much you've increased your horsepower. Doubling it is not true. 410 horsepower doubled would be over 800. It wasn't even close.
But (.70 x 410) + 410 is just under 700 horsepower total, so how are you getting 750? And at 70% with our calculations, would put your Taurus right around 590 horsepower. Try running an SRT4 or Eclipse and see if it runs close to it, because I'm thinking that is what it will do.
 
The problem with that, Slash, is that it's not based on the horsepower of the car. KT and I have already tested it on a low horsepower car and it turns out that 100% nitrous doesn't mean double horsepower. The test car outran the bench car by over 5 lengths; test car being at 50% engine limiting & 100% nitrous, and bench car being 100% horsepower. I figured maybe the engine limiter doesn't affect nitrous, so I removed parts to half the horsepower of the bench car and tried again with 100% nitrous - same turnout. We also ran the test with racing tires & automatic stock transmissions, so driver error would not play a role. From our testing, 50% nitrous is around a 125 shot, and 100% is obviously double that.

What parts did you remove? Some parts can have a dramatic affect on powerband/tq figures. Did you try this on multiple cars?
 
What parts did you remove? Some parts can have a dramatic affect on powerband/tq figures. Did you try this on multiple cars?
It was on a Honda Fit, the starting car in the game. I compared numbers on the powerband and it removed exactly half the horsepower and as close to half of the torque as I could, switching parts to see which would take off more or less. This is the only car we tested it on, as it was a low horsepower car and I fully expected to be proven wrong by it. If anyone is willing to test a different car, something in the medium horsepower range, I will be online in about 10 minutes so we can try it on one or more cars. I will be in the bench or the test car, depending on if you want to see the proof yourself - but I have more than enough credits to buy nitrous.
 
Back