- 2,229
- Canada
- BaronBlitzRed
The Italian Jobs...
When it was said "Here's a close duel" in the title of the Time Trial, I was somewhat skeptical... but I'm happy to admit that I'm impressed with that statement now. It was way closer than I was thinking anyways. Sure, on paper the stats have them in the same ballpark, but c'mon... it's a Ferrari. Should be 'nuff said!
So we'll start off with the pretender contender...
The Baby Lambo... the Gallardo LP 560-4. The entry level Lamborghini grew up a bit since it was released back in 2003. This version actually had some balls to it. I'm not a huge fan of the company, especially since it got taken over by another company. It might have saved them in one way, but it turned them into a cookie cutter. All of the models look way too similar now. The "You can tell it's a Lambo" argument just doesn't cut it either... and this duel has the perfect example of why.
Anyhoo... let's get to the driving part of it. With only a 60 kg difference between the 2 cars, it was worth having the heavy AWD system to make it such a different driving experience from the Ferrari. On this week's track selection, it showed both the strengths and the weaknesses of both drivetrains. All in all, I gotta admit I had fun in it. Some of the cornering was sharper and some not so much. It needed the extra 50 some odd hamsters to help make up for the time you'd lose in certain situations. And it used them well. Well enough to make it into the top 3 favourites for this brand!
It's no secret that I'm a big fan of Ferrari. Their product lines have always been deep and diverse, enough for anyone to find a model that would suit their tastes. Both manufacturers are status symbol cars, but Ferrari has put out way too many works of art on wheels to be sluffed off as just a petrol powered symbol of mid-life crisis.
The Scuderia version here in this battle was a good choice in hindsight, as the Lambo had evolved into the performance edition it is. The MR drivetrain of this model made the battle a little more even as well. The 430 is a pretty nimble car in it's own right, and the results prove it.
The Lambo: 1:37.481
The Scud: 1:36.999
Now, even though the results are way closer than I would've drempt, I still would give the Ferrari the nod as it offered more confidence overall... the handling and the performance are what you'd expect and more. The Gallardo is no slouch, either in power or the handling... but I found myself holding back a bit to ease through some of the course, where as the Ferrari sliced through it. Had this test been on street series tires, the results would have been greatly affected. With the top tier tires allowed however, it allowed me to put both cars through their paces and pushed both to the limits.
The baby Lambo gains my respect, while the Scuderia gains the win in a close, very close battle. Nice DOTW!!!
Cheers
When it was said "Here's a close duel" in the title of the Time Trial, I was somewhat skeptical... but I'm happy to admit that I'm impressed with that statement now. It was way closer than I was thinking anyways. Sure, on paper the stats have them in the same ballpark, but c'mon... it's a Ferrari. Should be 'nuff said!
So we'll start off with the pretender contender...
The Baby Lambo... the Gallardo LP 560-4. The entry level Lamborghini grew up a bit since it was released back in 2003. This version actually had some balls to it. I'm not a huge fan of the company, especially since it got taken over by another company. It might have saved them in one way, but it turned them into a cookie cutter. All of the models look way too similar now. The "You can tell it's a Lambo" argument just doesn't cut it either... and this duel has the perfect example of why.
Anyhoo... let's get to the driving part of it. With only a 60 kg difference between the 2 cars, it was worth having the heavy AWD system to make it such a different driving experience from the Ferrari. On this week's track selection, it showed both the strengths and the weaknesses of both drivetrains. All in all, I gotta admit I had fun in it. Some of the cornering was sharper and some not so much. It needed the extra 50 some odd hamsters to help make up for the time you'd lose in certain situations. And it used them well. Well enough to make it into the top 3 favourites for this brand!
It's no secret that I'm a big fan of Ferrari. Their product lines have always been deep and diverse, enough for anyone to find a model that would suit their tastes. Both manufacturers are status symbol cars, but Ferrari has put out way too many works of art on wheels to be sluffed off as just a petrol powered symbol of mid-life crisis.
The Scuderia version here in this battle was a good choice in hindsight, as the Lambo had evolved into the performance edition it is. The MR drivetrain of this model made the battle a little more even as well. The 430 is a pretty nimble car in it's own right, and the results prove it.
The Lambo: 1:37.481
The Scud: 1:36.999
Now, even though the results are way closer than I would've drempt, I still would give the Ferrari the nod as it offered more confidence overall... the handling and the performance are what you'd expect and more. The Gallardo is no slouch, either in power or the handling... but I found myself holding back a bit to ease through some of the course, where as the Ferrari sliced through it. Had this test been on street series tires, the results would have been greatly affected. With the top tier tires allowed however, it allowed me to put both cars through their paces and pushed both to the limits.
The baby Lambo gains my respect, while the Scuderia gains the win in a close, very close battle. Nice DOTW!!!
Cheers
Last edited: