- 7,313
- Land of the smelly onion
And herein lies the problem. Keeping consistent is code for "making a sweeping generalisation," and is not really a good thing. All it means is that you can look at something that you're not sure about and state an opinion without really thinking. Not every hot hatch is cool. Not every muscle car is cool either. Just because I know less about muscle cars doesn't mean I maintain the same opinion for every single one.
I am consistent in my opinion that hatchbacks (hot, warm, tepid, cold, or otherwise) are not cool.
Totally agree. So you shouldn't be surprised when someone who doesn't share your opinion wishes to debate it, particularly when said opinion comes across as generally dismissive rather than a well-considered judgement. Asking "why?" is what makes a debate interesting. Otherwise we'd just be left with a group of people bashing their skulls into one another for supremacy.
Nothing wrong with asking for a further explanation of why one voted a certain way.
Debates in these threads I find rather pointless. On the off chance that you were able to change my opinion about this car, I can't change my vote.
My point - and one that has been reiterated time and time again in these threads - is that power is not the be-all and end-all of either performance driving, or indeed coolness. I, and many others, struggle to understand why some people are seemingly incapable of understanding that a car outside of their very small niche might possibly be cool too.
Never said power was the be-all end-all, in fact I never made any mention of power, or lack thereof as a reason for the SU vote.