- 7,703
- Indy
- xXKingJoshXx
Seriously uncool. Do I need to say anymore?
Yes. Your reasoning?
Seriously uncool. Do I need to say anymore?
inb4 I4.Yes. Your reasoning?
This was the quickest version. There was a 4x4 version too but it was a little slower and heavier.
And you must be mixing them up - the BX had GT and GTI versions. GTE was a Vauxhall badge mostly, I think.
Yes. Your reasoning?
Not really. They were the forerunner to the ZX, replaced by the Xsara, replaced by the C4. It's probably still a little longer than your average supermini these days, but I'd be surprised if it's any wider or higher.Small? BXs are large cars.
I'm sorry, it just looked small to me in the picture.Small? BXs are large cars.
I think what you're talking about there is je ne sais quoi, @RandomCarGuy17
Yep - for its time it was a quick car, went around corners well (an advantage of the suspension) and was nicely quirky in quite a few ways inside (the 'fingertip controls for the dash were a great idea, the tape deck being located between the two seats was not).A N/A 2 liter straight 4 with over 110kw in 1987 ain't too shabby in my book. For comparison it's more than Toyota Celica or a Mitsubishi Eclipse 2.0 of the same era, and it's a family hatchback.
Small? BXs are large cars.
Nope - its not a large carIf the specifications here, here and here are accurate, it's roughly equivalent in size to the original Dodge Neon, E100 Toyota Corolla and the EG Honda Civic (longer wheelbase with somewhat higher height, shorter and narrower car); as three random examples that were going on sale around the time the BX was ending production. I know the "wacky European/American car size differences" filter is in effect, but under no circumstances would I call those three large cars.
It's a pity the mid-life revision took away some of those weird quirky features. They went back to standard indicator stalks then, and removed the wacky rotating barrel speedo. On a slightly more anoraky note I prefer the pre-facelift styling as well. Ever so slightly crisper.Yep - for its time it was a quick car, went around corners well (an advantage of the suspension) and was nicely quirky in quite a few ways inside (the 'fingertip controls for the dash were a great idea, the tape deck being located between the two seats was not).
Earlier:What were the differences between the interiors?
It's a pity the mid-life revision took away some of those weird quirky features. They went back to standard indicator stalks then, and removed the wacky rotating barrel speedo. On a slightly more anoraky note I prefer the pre-facelift styling as well. Ever so slightly crisper.
Incidentally, while I made my vote for different reasons, the GTI is actually my least favourite BX, styling-wise. The arch extensions and deeper bumpers are ever so slightly overcooked in that typical 80s way. Make mine a bog-standard pre-facelift car:
Those interiors make me want to puke all over.
No.What are you talking about? The GTi modifications look sort of sporty, that's all. Is the coolest car, to you, the one that's barely noticeable or conspicuous at all?
Not everyone perceives the world on one-dimensional scales. I know when you come across someone who considers things differently, it borks your linear model of "how people work" and returns an erroneous value from either of the extreme endpoints, but people's preferences just aren't that simple.Is the coolest car, to you, the one that's barely noticeable or conspicuous at all?
Oh trust me, I knowI'm pretty sure that the porn red interior of certain Fords causes similar reactions in some people.. And for that you can't even use "it was 80's, everything was horrid back then" as excuse.
I quite liked them.. quirky at least.. I went cool.
Also saw this on PH.. works for me