GTP Cool Wall: 2002-2004 Ferrari Enzo Ferrari
- Thread starter Wiegert
- 43 comments
- 2,933 views
- 1,513
- Pacific NW
- ThrasherDBS
- ThrasherDBS
- 4,763
- Houston, TX
Styling is awkward from most angles. Low low cool.
- 13,264
- GTPlanet
- Street-King-07
- Quattro Saltire
Not the prettiest, but a big step on from the F50 and the noise from that V12 is just magical with a mix of brutal.
Cool.
Cool.
- 15,159
- Grandville Mi
- Gotbeefboy564
- Got beef boy564
Sounds good espically with a cold start.
Last edited:
- 4,763
- Houston, TX
The Ex-Schumacher Enzo has some interesting options. The polished wheel finish was uncommon as well as the tan interior and power windows.
- 5,551
- Controls set for heart of sun
- GTP_RogerTheHors
Modern Ferrari.
- 1,019
- Madison, WI
- FerrariF1GT
- FerrariFan24
When I signed up for GTP, I was a huge fan of Ferrari.
Now I've grown out of it and I find the Enzo their last genuinely good car, and I would find it S-Z, although I much prefer the McLaren F1 now. I would change my name if I could, but I don't have premium.
SU is the verdict, one of many cars that I like that are SU. Enzo's name shouldn't have been christened here, and this looks quite flashy.
Now I've grown out of it and I find the Enzo their last genuinely good car, and I would find it S-Z, although I much prefer the McLaren F1 now. I would change my name if I could, but I don't have premium.
SU is the verdict, one of many cars that I like that are SU. Enzo's name shouldn't have been christened here, and this looks quite flashy.
Last edited:
- 2,107
- Massachusetts
- CreamyNute11a
The last truly awesome street legal Ferrari IMO. Sub Zero
- 3,200
- Murcie LP710
Modern Ferrari, with Ferrari's stupid customer laws.
Seriously, Seriously Uncool.
Seriously, Seriously Uncool.
- 6,257
- Ottawa
- Pyano1132
Cool car, but stupid name. I was fine with F60
- 8,642
- London
- GTP_Stotty
All modern Ferrari's are seriously uncool, but this one is one of, if not the, worst... like the LaF, the front end is just pig ugly, and it looks way too heavy over the rear quarters... the proportions are terrible.
I went to a classic car show last weekend and there was an Enzo there with the engine cover up. My mate and I had a really good look round it... the build quality was honestly no better than most kits cars. The welding in particular, was terrible - uneven , with gaps in places you could put end of your finger in to. Ancillaries were randomly scattered round the engine bay, often at odd angles, bolted to the carbon tub with different fixings on every one. There were glue over runs all over the tub. I could go on... it was shocking. You would see better build quality on a £10k Korean hatch back.
Belongs in a class below SU.
I went to a classic car show last weekend and there was an Enzo there with the engine cover up. My mate and I had a really good look round it... the build quality was honestly no better than most kits cars. The welding in particular, was terrible - uneven , with gaps in places you could put end of your finger in to. Ancillaries were randomly scattered round the engine bay, often at odd angles, bolted to the carbon tub with different fixings on every one. There were glue over runs all over the tub. I could go on... it was shocking. You would see better build quality on a £10k Korean hatch back.
Belongs in a class below SU.
- 27,387
- Toronto
- NewAesthetic
- SlipZtrEm
An ungainly-looking thing, especially from head-on. The point where Ferrari gave up on even attempting to have any sensual design features. Was one of the stupidest names for a car in a long time, and it took a solid decade for a car to take that crown. It was another Ferrari.
SU.
SU.
- 9,401
- Western Sydney
- mustafur
Regardless of what it actually is, the fact that you can only buy one by showing loyalty to ferrari in the past by buying several makes it an instant SU.
Not only is it a play toy for old People(thanks to to that stupid Requirement by Ferrari), but it's basically a display of arrogance by the Brand.
Not only is it a play toy for old People(thanks to to that stupid Requirement by Ferrari), but it's basically a display of arrogance by the Brand.
- 1,071
- Haywards Heath, West Sussex (i think)
- MMR_LukeMitchell
Not right to put Enzo's name on this. You can see how they've attempted to attract people who know next to nothing about cars by addin gull wing doors and that terrible steering wheel design.
Seriously uncool.
Seriously uncool.
- 4,040
- UK
- ReTyger
Pretty sure those shenanigans started with the FXX
I wasn't aware of that, though personally I would judge the car in isolation rather than a "display" of the policies of the marque. There are many cars that have some form of exclusivity, in a number of ways. The way Ferrari dealt with the FXX etc. on the other hand, genuinely affects/limits the experience and enjoyment of the car.
