Gotta get that recognition that comes with volume posting every car you've ever heard of@Neddo couldn't put it in the GT suggestion forum (for fear of being banned by @Famine) along with their thousands of other suggestions, so this was the only other place.
Even if it weren't so profoundly ugly, it's just another supercar concept and therefor not worth of anything higher than an SU vote from me.
Lol, wut.
I checked the current results of this car's poll whether if this car will go to hell or not and it looks like this car will be heading instead to the Uncool rank.
Current results so far: -0.93. (Eligible for Uncool.)
I blame those who voted for SZ and Meh.
Looks like I used the wrong equation though. Thanks for clarifying.Not sure what maths you're using, this car is currently sitting at -1.72, almost as Uncool at the Puma.
This car's nomination begs the question, why is it allowed to nominate vapor ware cars?
Considering Dr. Youabian's attitude towards anybody who knocked his road-going steroidwagon, I'm glad to see the Puma wasn't moved up from rock bottom by a stylistically challenged autobot that appeared on an airstrip one day and seemingly vanished the next without its creators getting into a hissy fit over all the negative feedback it received.
How do you know the maker of this vaporware car has a bad attitude? I want to hear more.Considering Dr. Youabian's attitude towards anybody who knocked his road-going steroidwagon, I'm glad to see the Puma wasn't moved up from rock bottom by a stylistically challenged autobot that appeared on an airstrip one day and seemingly vanished the next without its creators getting into a hissy fit over all the negative feedback it received.
How do you know the maker of this vaporware car has a bad attitude? I want to hear more.