GTP_WRS Week 4: Mount Shelby
- Thread starter Allibubba99
- 116 comments
- 7,796 views
- 2,228
- Bielefeld
- tarnheld
@chimeleon, your splits will not be fetched in this format, you have to replace , with . for the split-seconds, and with : for the minute separator. @WRSFetchBot is very picky about that.
- 154
- FRANCE
- Chim_GT3
Thanks for warning it's modified@chimeleon, your splits will not be fetched in this format, you have to replace , with . for the split-seconds, and with : for the minute separator. @WRSFetchBot is very picky about that.
- 541
- California
- GTP_billyjoebobx
Wickedly fun combo 
And to think last week I was complaining about too much grip
Such a lovely flowing track until the last two corners
36.810
1:21.443
And to think last week I was complaining about too much grip
Such a lovely flowing track until the last two corners
36.810
1:21.443
- 7,207
- Ostend, Belgium
- Speedy6543
I find the old layout, where you could take the last corners almost flatout, much more enjoyable.
- 1,440
- Kuwait
- Boabdulrahman
New to the scene here. Was looking for something like this for a while after the old GT5 Prologue Online time trial boards.
This is me for now. Looking to improve later on.
37.116
1:22.039
This is me for now. Looking to improve later on.
37.116
1:22.039
- 1,440
- Kuwait
- Boabdulrahman
Slight improvements.
36.926
1:21.597
36.926
1:21.597
To get a time on the board,( 3 tries at it.) only had bronze from when I went through all the S test
with controller, wheel not set up today. S6
38.842
1:24.363
might give it a go with wheel, if I have time this week sometime (if im not out fishing lol)
with controller, wheel not set up today. S6
38.842
1:24.363
might give it a go with wheel, if I have time this week sometime (if im not out fishing lol)
Last edited:
- 175
- United Kingdom
- Chrome_PuPXD
- 175
- United Kingdom
- Chrome_PuPXD
36.450
1:20.784
Gave up a little S1 but finally converted into a meaningful difference at the line, and just in time to watch the footy too.
1:20.784
Gave up a little S1 but finally converted into a meaningful difference at the line, and just in time to watch the footy too.
- 1,524
- Texas
- RuddRacer
New splits
36.688
1:21.640
I had TC on 1. Not 100% sure how much help it was or utilized because old habits are hard to brake, I was still driving like I had TC off.
I would tend to agree with @mohitraina91 that the best case for it helping (depending on driver skill level) is in sector 1.
36.688
1:21.640
I had TC on 1. Not 100% sure how much help it was or utilized because old habits are hard to brake, I was still driving like I had TC off.
I would tend to agree with @mohitraina91 that the best case for it helping (depending on driver skill level) is in sector 1.
- 4,074
- buenos aires
- GTP_Roamer2629
Imho the level of TC, or none at all, is very car dependant. A higher value seems to be smoother at reducing wheelspin on cars above 500hp. Some 4wd and FF need none at all, as some FR, like the F430. It's hard to describe in few words, but sometimes it seems like 1 takes too long to kick in then the drop in power is very sharp, while 3 is a longer but smoother reduction in power.
- 889
- NZL
- colinnola
Finally back on the wheel after two weeks of issues.
Tried it on TC0, but my right foot is apparently made out of lead and this car would rather do doughnuts than turn corners. So TC now on 1 and I've found multiple seconds over my existing time here.
37.967
1:23.212
Just a tenth or two on every corner and all will be good.
Tried it on TC0, but my right foot is apparently made out of lead and this car would rather do doughnuts than turn corners. So TC now on 1 and I've found multiple seconds over my existing time here.
37.967
1:23.212
Just a tenth or two on every corner and all will be good.
- 1,590
- IL
- shoenboggie
37.000
1:21.718
May need to try using TC…
1:21.718
May need to try using TC…
- 154
- FRANCE
- Chim_GT3
I tried without..... after 1st short curve i putted it on.......
- 1,440
- Kuwait
- Boabdulrahman
36.617
1:21.273
1:21.273
- 1,828
- Toronto, Canada
- TPC_Gooners
I must’ve engine swapped my Shelby with an Ecoboost engine. Only explanation 
36.679
1:21.164
36.679
1:21.164
