GTPlanet's 1/4 mile Leaderboard/Database - Post your times here

  • Thread starter MadMax
  • 5,025 comments
  • 340,620 views
Status
Not open for further replies.
Took a quick crack at the rs-6. 08'. Still need to work on it :/

c6325567.jpg

Jealous!!! I have been trying to crack 9.2XX with mine but since I broke it in and played with the tranny, I never got her close again!
 
Celica ss-ll (ZZT231) '03 11.667

2 min tune lol

IMAG0312.jpg


ok after lil bit more tuning got her to
11.587

IMAG0315.jpg
 
Last edited:
DylanM96
Ok thanks mate, btw how do you add ppl on gtplanet

Go to their profile and just under their friends there's a small writing thing that says befriend ____
 
KaroSVTR
5min tune would of bin faster lol

It was a long day and that was the last car I was tuning for the night lol, I just want any idea where im at with others times so I know how much work I need to do.
 
viperbeatsvette
i have one of these will try and get a time done tomorrow but i doubt so. whats the hp and kg (non-ballast)

HP is 400 and kg 970 let me know what you come up with Im going to mess with it today.
 
FTO GPX '97 11.794

Does anyone know what FTO is the fastest and how fast they can get?

The FTO GP Version R has a bit more power, weights less and I'm sure it'll runs faster. I haven't tune mine yet so can't tell you exactly how fast, but will do soon.
 
SHEEEEEEETTT KARO!! That's muchacho respect right there man!! I can't figure out for the life of me to get it under 9.105 -.-
 
Simple Matt
SHEEEEEEETTT KARO!! That's muchacho respect right there man!! I can't figure out for the life of me to get it under 9.105 -.-

Lol thank you my friend. It's something do common Idno why I didn't try it earlier.
 
c-losk
The FTO GP Version R has a bit more power, weights less and I'm sure it'll runs faster. I haven't tune mine yet so can't tell you exactly how fast, but will do soon.

Cool thanks man I just picked one of them up last night ill get to it some time lol
 
Jealous!!! I have been trying to crack 9.2XX with mine but since I broke it in and played with the tranny, I never got her close again!

Im trying to catch Karo's time but I'm sure I have the wrong trans setup :dunce:
 
Simple Matt
SHEEEEEEETTT KARO!! That's muchacho respect right there man!! I can't figure out for the life of me to get it under 9.105 -.-

I ran two guys yesterday and they said their Murceilagos hit 8.90's at SSRX. They kept up with my Aventador which runs high 9.8's.

Surprised me just as much as seeing the ZZ2 keep up!
 
DonkeyPunch707
I ran two guys yesterday and they said their Murceilagos hit 8.90's at SSRX. They kept up with my Aventador which runs high 9.8's.

Surprised me just as much as seeing the ZZ2 keep up!

9.8? You mean 8.9? Problem with 1/4 is with tree lagg you can't always tell and the faster car can lose.
 
viperbeatsvette
9.8? You mean 8.9? Problem with 1/4 is with tree lagg you can't always tell and the faster car can lose.

Nope...the real problem is that when we are tuning on the test track, we concentrate even more hitting our shift points to get a fast time.

Now seriously? Do you think we concentrate as much when we are lined up on the tree ready to go? some of us are more nervous and our shifts are not that perfect.

I bet thats the reason why most faster cars lose at times, is when we are in action, not the test track.
 
viperbeatsvette
9.8? You mean 8.9? Problem with 1/4 is with tree lagg you can't always tell and the faster car can lose.

LOL thanks for the correction.

I try not to take losing so bad when online. Now that I know there maybe some lag. One dude I swear beat me by a bumper said on his screen he had me by a 1.5 cars, SMH!

What's "tree lag"? When you can't see the person ghosting?
 
MidNight HP
Nope...the real problem is that when we are tuning on the test track, we concentrate even more hitting our shift points to get a fast time.

Now seriously? Do you think we concentrate as much when we are lined up on the tree ready to go? some of us are more nervous and our shifts are not that perfect.

I bet thats the reason why most faster cars lose at times, is when we are in action, not the test track.

Nervous about something you don't concentrate on? :lol:

I tend to not race aus 1/4 mile and when racing many Americans the lagg is an issue, many times it just looks like my car is sh:censored:



Also tree lagg is when any lagg happens off the tree, so yea not seeing ghost or seeing it later and the other guy leaves first and if it's the right time frame it just looks like your car is slow
 
Nope...the real problem is that when we are tuning on the test track, we concentrate even more hitting our shift points to get a fast time.

Now seriously? Do you think we concentrate as much when we are lined up on the tree ready to go? some of us are more nervous and our shifts are not that perfect.

I bet thats the reason why most faster cars lose at times, is when we are in action, not the test track.

Very true, I one of the nervous people whenever I'm lined up with someone I know is really fast here. I either concentrate too much on shifts and start swerving or I'm trying to keep it straight and forget to shift at the right spot :dunce:
 
Mikeybc
Very true, I one of the nervous people whenever I'm lined up with someone I know is really fast here. I either concentrate too much on shifts and start swerving or I'm trying to keep it straight and forget to shift at the right spot :dunce:

Lol see what I mean. But I also get what the op is talking about with ghost lagg. have you ever watched 2 televisions at the same time on the same channal? If so then you may notice how one picture switches first before the other. I think thats what we all get online.

You could be racing someone in another state and there TV twiches before yours lol
 
Awesome time nuke!! it is still a good sleeper in the right room. A little more work and you can get it down to a 8.991 ;)
 
blahdm.jpg



photo2xf.jpg



Apparently, I accelerate fast on all my cars lol. Well, I should say, apparently, I "tree" real well from 0-60 for all my cars lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back