Heartfelt congratulations to Jammy for winning ITCC 3!

  • Thread starter ITCC_Andrew
  • 4,261 comments
  • 113,802 views
Are these Q times with or without draft?

Q times without draft 99% of time

with whatever draft you can get your hands on

gokartman didn't have draft on his lap, I was watching.

My A**hat brother :mad:

Sorry that I had to go Buck :(

No worries.

What is a good time without draft?

1:33.xxx is good.

1:32.xxx is great.

1:31.xxx is alien fast. Only Jammy and gokartman were able to run 1:31s in qualifying.

1:34.000 is a good time
1:32.000 is a great time
1:37.900 is a slow time

at trial mountain

Pretty much this, except no one was running 1:37.9xx. Not even you, Riley. 👍
 
Rd. 3 Race 2 Official Results:

gokartman: 21m37.026s (Run Group B)
Jammy: 21m51.157s (A)
MrM: 22m04.371s (A)
Driverman447: 22m04.688s (A)
Sparky: 22m09.142s (A)
Buck: 22m13.263s (A)
Adam: 22m13.863 (A)
Siggers: 22m24.240s (A)
boy: 22m45.107s (A)
Nas: 22m51.864s (B)
polar: 22m59.045s (B)
tbw: 23m04s (A)
whisky: -1 lap (B)
 
Last edited:
This is both friday and saturday times put together or just for today? :confused:
 
Ok :confused:

Did I participate in yesterday's race?

Yes.

Yes you did, but you shouldn't have bothered :sly:

:confused:

Here we go again buck :rolleyes:

:confused: :scared:


👍

Andrew I must ask, where is my Rd 3. R2 Group A time?

Slower than Run Group B time.


Rd. 3 Race 3 Official Results:

gokartman: 21m42.552s (B)
Driverman447: 21m55.015s (B)
MrM: 21m56.933s (B)
Jammy: 22m03.986s (A)
Polar: 22m12.564s (A)
Buck: 22m13.116s (B)
Spark: 22m17.669s (A)
Siggers: 22m36.782s (A)
Nas: 22m43.779s (B)
boy: 22m50.018s (A)
Whisky: 23m06.576s (10 second corner cutting penalty) (B)
tbwhhs: 23m11.189s (A)
 
Last edited:
But I didn't finish GB R2 (Holy abbreviations Batman!).

Yes...?

Rd. 3 Race 3 Official Results:

gokartman: 21m42.552s (B)
Driverman447: 21m55.015s (B)
MrM: 21m56.933s (B)
Jammy: 22m03.986s (A)
Polar: 22m12.564s (A)
Buck: 22m13.116s (B)
Spark: 22m17.669s (A)
Siggers: 22m36.782s (A)
Nas: 22m43.779s (B)
boy: 22m50.018s (A)
Whisky: 23m06.576s (10 second corner cutting penalty) (B)
tbwhhs: 23m11.189s (A)
 
I'll just head to the nearest nut-house, thank you very much Andrew but I think I clearly lost my sanity :crazy:

Is it a good thing? I dunno :confused:
 
Your Run Group A time counts; you've gotten 7th place in that race.


You scored points in every race this weekend, I don't know what you're on about. Yes, you disconnected from Rd. 3 Race 3 (B), but you got points because of Run Group A race on Friday.
 
Not going to lie here, but I don't get why people should get this second chance. If they can't attend can't it just be accepted, rather than Friday runners not knowing if their position is actually going to be where they'll get classified? I'm not criticising or asking for a change, just siting my opinion. :)
 
How about make it this way mel.

Those who can't make it on Friday, get their last chance on Saturday. Those who already raced on Friday already had their chance.
 
How about make it this way mel.

Those who can't make it on Friday, get their last chance on Saturday. Those who already raced on Friday don't need to race on saturday.

That basically is how it works. Basically. But, I see no reason not to have those who race on Friday allowed to run on Saturday...
 
I just don't like the idea of winning a race on Friday night and then logging on Sunday morning to see you've been knocked back to fourth or something. If circumstances/crashes slow you down that's just a fact of life in my opinion. I don't see why a second chance system is needed.
 
I just don't like the idea of winning a race on Friday night and then logging on Sunday morning to see you've been knocked back to fourth or something. If circumstances/crashes slow you down that's just a fact of life in my opinion. I don't see why a second chance system is needed, TBH.

It's not that it's a second chance. It's that everyone can use it to make up rounds...

I only ran today in response to my GVE absence.

...like that.
 
Back