Help with NSX'S

[gt4supra]

I cant find a way to put turbo on any of them...anyone have a nsx that has turbo and can be upgraded?thanks

 

[VTiRoj]

I cant find a way to put turbo on any of them...anyone have a nsx that has turbo and can be upgraded?thanks

No normal NSX can be turbo'd.

I think the LM Road Car can though. 1005bhp NA isnt really realistic for a NSX.

 

[shoman]

Yup gets to hot back there!

 

[Spec M]

Maybe in GT5 hopefully. We may even get to have centrifugal superchargers. But from my experience I personally think the C30 and C32 are best left N/A as well as most other Vtec motors.

 

[shoman]

Agreed I think some car's are better left N/A. NSX's are still fast this way.

 

[VTiRoj]

Maybe in GT5 hopefully. We may even get to have centrifugal superchargers. But from my experience I personally think the C30 and C32 are best left N/A as well as most other Vtec motors.

Supercharger also works, which is what I'm hoping for in GT5.

Suprcharged NSX-R... now that would be unbeatable.

 

[Rotary Junkie]

Supercharger also works, which is what I'm hoping for in GT5.

Suprcharged NSX-R... now that would be unbeatable.

Nah, a turbo 20B NSX-R would beat it.

 

[Spec M]

Nah, a turbo 20B NSX-R would beat it.

Did you mean a 20B Rx7?

 

[mafia_boy]

Did you mean a 20B Rx7?

No, he means rip the poptart out and put a chook cooker in there instead.

 

[Spec M]

Wow swap a C30/32 for a 20B?! Dont get me wrong I like rotatries but that just doesnt make any sense to me. A factory NSX is a pretty flawless platform to begin with, and the C30 can handle boost alot better without you worrying about blowing the engine. It would actually be degrading.

 

[Rotary Junkie]

More power, same or less weight, sounds win-win to me.

 

[shoman]

Will it wouldn't work you would have 1 up gear and 4 down gear!!!! There is very little you can do to help the nsx but boost!

 

[Rotary Junkie]

C30/32 is reverse rotation?

Ah well, I can get a different trans that corrects that.

 

[VTiRoj]

More power, same or less weight, sounds win-win to me.

Waste all that cash for a little bit more power? I call that a lose situation

 

[Spec M]

The C30 was said to be the most advanced motor of it time in the early 90s. shoman theres tons of stuff you can do to the NSX N/A. I dont know why people just pick the simple route and just want to boost a car thats perfectly fine N/A. The NSX is often compared to the 911 Carrera Coupe, Ferrari 360 and other exotics. Its been proven to be a better track car than some that have 150hp more and cost 2-3 times more. They say its actually F1 inspired.

 

[Rotary Junkie]

The chassis was bloody tuned by Ayrton Senna! It can't be BAD.

 

[shoman]

Oh yeah. I like it just like it is. IMO. Yes a lot of people what to boost on everything. N/A you can build it up and glue the hood shut and not worry about it!

RJ go get a FD and I'll ask you if you are a junkie for the rotory! Those thing's stay in the garage! Too much heat. They melt coolant line's and everything.

 

[Rotary Junkie]

Can't afford an FD, but I will bite and buy an NA FC when I can.

 

[shoman]

Well then ok!!! Lol fc are good I myself hate FD's.

 

[Spec M]

I love FCs and FDs but I personally think the 20B is the best rotary engine next to the renesis. The 13B is infamous for blowing for no apparent reason.

 

[Perfect Balance]

Well then ok!!! Lol fc are good I myself hate FD's.

So then, you like the worse out of the 2?

Your logic is awesome.....

 

[Spec M]

The FC is worst in what way exactly? As far as dependability?

 

[Perfect Balance]

The FC is worst in what way exactly? As far as dependability?

Every aspect of the car is improved on the FD (suspension, brakes, engine), except if you like the looks of the FC better.

EDIT: That should have been obvious.

 

[Rotary Junkie]

NA FC FTW. That's all I have to say.

 

[Spec M]

At PB; Well actually the FD 92-95 also had the 13B as well as the FC so they actually shared the same engine just different aspirations. The 92+ had a TT 13B(<the most proned to blow) and the 20B was mounted in the FD in 93. Also the FD having better brakes, suspension doesnt make the FC worst. In fact the FC was great for its time as well as the FD. But the FD was actually the one known for the infamous blown rotary.

 

[Skygrasper550]

Supercharger also works, which is what I'm hoping for in GT5.

Suprcharged NSX-R... now that would be unbeatable.

oh yeah baby!!

well the NSX-R IS a supercar.., i heard that it can reach 200mph...on bone STOCK....

 

[Rotary Junkie]

No, that's a lie.

 

[Spec M]

oh yeah baby!!

well the NSX-R IS a supercar.., i heard that it can reach 200mph...on bone STOCK....

Its possible N/A with under 350ps but ive never heard of 200mph bone stock. 170 something is whats reported in one of my BMI dvds with a 03 NSX R.

 

[Skygrasper550]

No, that's a lie.

i just overheard it, i'm not sure if it is really true..,

well now i know..,

 

[shoman]

So then, you like the worse out of the 2?

Your logic is awesome.....

I myself when I buy a car would like to drive it. They are like supra of the day. Good for the time. The only reason I don't like FD's are because of how everything is set up. It over heat's, it melt's hoses. Unreliable.

For 10 months or less out of the year, your broke always fix hoses. You might get to drive 2 months out of the year. I will go with the FC anyday!