I disagree. (I think)
Changing 6th gear(alone) doesn't really effect how the car accelerates in second gear does it?
It change a lot the look of the gear panel setting , but it's only visually.
If the ratios and final gear ratio are still the same , no reason to change anything.
Am I the only one left that just eyeballs gearboxes?
I count in clicks and measure by memory.![]()
Yep that's it exactly.He's saying if you make 6th gear longer, your car will be a bit slower through all gears though, essentially. (I think)
Like there's some kind of "total transmission" parameter, in which the value of all gears combined effects the cars acceleration.
Yep that's it exactly.![]()
How about changing lower gear only, say 2nd or 3rd gets longer, while 4th to 6th stays the same, top speed should stay the same, right ?
How about changing lower gear only, say 2nd or 3rd gets longer, while 4th to 6th stays the same, top speed should stay the same, right ?
Shouldn't beHe's saying if you make 6th gear longer, your car will be a bit slower through all gears though, essentially. (I think)
The final gear number does this.Like there's some kind of "total transmission" parameter, in which the value of all gears combined effects the cars acceleration.
If final gear stays (therefore the first 5 gear ratios too) the same, of course not. 6th gear (if it's the last gear) is a bad example because there's no higher gear which could be affected.Should be easy to test. Take any transmission that was previously optimal for launch and 1 mile test. Alter nothing but the 6th gear, and race your ghost. If the car is slower/faster through any of the first 5 gears, I'd say that would be proof.
If the distance isn't limited or the acceleration drops to 0 before crossing the line, then yes but otherwise not. It doesn't have to be visible, because usually difference is not even a mph big.How about changing lower gear only, say 2nd or 3rd gets longer, while 4th to 6th stays the same, top speed should stay the same, right ?
The final gear is the critical point - a tranny with the exact same total gear ratios (single gear * final gear) but lower final gear number will generally be better for acceleration.
That's our daily bread in drag racing.This is the part I was talking about.
I had the Takata launching as fast as I could.
First Gear * Final = 13.045 or something
So, I changed a bunch of stuff around, but I made sure that no matter what, when I multiplied the Final by the First gear ratio, it = 13.045. (13.045/New Final=New 1st)
BUT, what I found was, that even though the 'total gear' was the same, the car accelerated differently, or gripped differently, whether resulting in bog, or excessive spin. Regardless, the point is that, final drive is more than just a ratio that gears are multiplied by.
Rotary Junkie posted this theory long ago, that Lower Final Drives are faster, than a higher final drive, even if every 'total gear' calculates out the exact same. I tested it and found it to be true, but unfortunately it was all muddied by flame wars with noobster back then, so it probably got burried.
And no, most people do not believe a lower final gear is faster, even when they got bullied off the grid starts in identical spec cars. I've found at least 75% of the time you can tell someone exactly why your car is faster, and they won't believe it and/or change their setup anyway. Most won't even try a lot of things.
Edit: I tried that front toe bit Adrenaline, it's worked at least to some degree on every car I've tried it on so far. 👍
You mean post 65?Slump, you do realize the final gear has virtually nothing to do with what Desperado was talking about right?
In the drag community pretty much every decent tuner believes it (and can even prove it...).And no, most people do not believe a lower final gear is faster, even when they got bullied off the grid starts in identical spec cars. I've found at least 75% of the time you can tell someone exactly why your car is faster, and they won't believe it and/or change their setup anyway. Most won't even try a lot of things.
Who do you think does the bullying off the grid starts?First part: Are you using the term 'people' as a general statement, or do you personally not believe it? I'm just curious.
Second part: What toe thing are you referring to?
1st half, I agree, it didn't click at first, but I do recall I have already tested cars only changing 6th gear and the ghost surely would have told me if it changed the acceleration before 6th gear.You mean post 65?
Uh well, I thought your post was a reaction on praianos post and not desperados. Alright, but it doesn't change the rest of my post, only the "no" and "nah".
Edited it now.
In the drag community pretty much every decent tuner believes it (and can even prove it...).
6th gear story: Surprisingly, if I go to the Speed Test mode, the difference is less than 0.001sec... practically 0...Who do you think does the bullying off the grid starts?
Front toe, entrance/exit over/understeer. Lost the thread. :/
1st half, I agree, it didn't click at first, but I do recall I have already tested cars only changing 6th gear and the ghost surely would have told me if it changed the acceleration before 6th gear.
2nd half, who do you think is doing the bullying off grid starts?![]()
So which one was faster? 3.000 or 4.138?
Yes of courseInteresting. You built an almost identical box https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Akr4MBOtjOcqdGw1RjVpOS14R0htZXQ4NEZDUzBRWmc yet you found a little over 0.2 seconds difference.
Is your testing repeatable?
It varies from car to car, but to my knowledge, lower FD is always faster, if only a little sometimes.Interesting. You built an almost identical box https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Akr4MBOtjOcqdGw1RjVpOS14R0htZXQ4NEZDUzBRWmc yet you found a little over 0.2 seconds difference.
Is your testing repeatable?