Incorrect Le Mans Prototype HP specifications

  • Thread starter Furinkazen
  • 35 comments
  • 4,061 views
Still doesn't change the fact they're very wrong so i'm not sure why you're making the point.

I think the Peugeot 908 is correct from that list, since that is the value of an oil changed one. All the others are way off though. However, when you are going to buy a car and look at the stats, are not those the correct ones? Or perhaps it was only so in GT4.
 
Wow...never knew this :ill:. More to add to the list of "incorrect car specs"?

Are they just standard LMP's or are the two (three? forgot how many) premium LMP's incorrect too? If so, might explain the R8's handling. 💡
 
Wow...never knew this :ill:. More to add to the list of "incorrect car specs"?

Are they just standard LMP's or are the two (three? forgot how many) premium LMP's incorrect too? If so, might explain the R8's handling. 💡

The HP and weight (on some) are incorrect.

Audi R8 '01 (610 / 822)
Audi R8 '05 (520 / 818)
Bentley Speed 8 (615 / 814)
BMW V12 LMR (580 / 764)
Pescarolo Courage-Judd GV5 (600 / 770)
Pescarolo C60 Hybride (660 / 905 with over 1000 possible)
Pescarolo Courage C60 Peugeot ((510 / 828)
Peugeot 908 (700 / 725)
Toyota GT-One (600 / 803)

Now obviously you have to give maybe 20-40hp for break in, but even then, some like the Pescarolo Peugeot are serious offenders.
 
All prototype's in GT are to fast... simple both LMP and group C car. Also it's unreal that Sauber C9 can beat Toyota GT-one or Audi R10 when they have much better aerodynamic and tires then old group C car's
 
When I bought the Toyota GT-one Race Car '99 the power was way off but after having changed the oil it returned to the 800bhp+.
 
Wow...never knew this :ill:. More to add to the list of "incorrect car specs"?

Are they just standard LMP's or are the two (three? forgot how many) premium LMP's incorrect too? If so, might explain the R8's handling. 💡

Lots.
 
Back