INTEREST CHECK - General photo comp?

  • Thread starter TB
  • 30 comments
  • 1,735 views

How often would you (honestly!) submit a shot?


  • Total voters
    23
Status
Not open for further replies.

TB

Space Lord
Moderator
35,314
United States
Downtown North Dakota
Cy-Fi
We've had the PSC competition and the Model competition which have both been fairly successful and long lived, but, sadly, Scaff's comp didn't take off nearly as much as it should have. I propose a revival of the concept - a fairly non-specific competition in an attempt to get as many entries as possible each month. I could certainly use some motivation to grab the camera a lot more often. Other might be in the same boat.

Please vote honestly as this will ultimately decide if this grows wings and takes off or not or if it's best shelved for the time being.
 
The issue I always had with the past photo comps is the time constraints combined with limited subjects. If this is more general, I think that will help a great deal in people being active in it.
 
Which is the exact reason I'm surprised Scaff's didn't do better. It ran monthly with intentionally general themes in an attempt to pull as many participants in as possible.
 
Echoing Azuremen's sentiments. Themes good, something too specific not so good. But I do like the idea, and I'd likely submit most weeks.
 
YES!!! I'm always on the lookout for photo ops. It'd really be more often if I know I can enter a pic in one of these.
 
Thanks for this, TB.👍👍 (only have 2 hands, so . . .otherwise I'm all thumbs ;)

I agree that a non-specific competition will definitely garner more entries. I feel that Scaff's project stalled because of the time frame involved - a month is too long - people lose interest in a fast-paced world. However a week is too short - it takes a week just to think about whatever new subject is in focus for that period. Maybe a bi-weekly comp. may be better suited?

As for me - I would vote that I'll probably enter at least 75% of the time - though I'll surely look over each and every competition. For me it's not about winning - in fact I'm never comfortable with the limelight. But to see all the wonderful pictures that would be posted would be fun and I'm sure will elicit suitable comment from all members - even those who never handle a camera.:)

I personally don't expect a flood of entries at the start - but as Summer catches on for half the world, we'll probably be roving around flying those remote video-cam choppers hungry to photograph a dragon-fly eye-to-eye . . . and who knows what we will bring back to GTPlanet from Earth?:)

TL : DR:
Thanks, TB. Go for it. I'm in.👍
 
Always depends if I have a good pic for the choosen theme or not, but yes I'm on
 
Looks like we have, including myself, a nice dozen people on board, so that's a great start. 👍

I'll try to get things set up this weekend as far as rules* go. Any request/suggestion regarding said guidelines and, while we're suggesting, themes?

* term used loosely as I'd like this to be as open and inviting as possible while still maintaining some resemblance of order :P
 
I'd say the only necessary rules are that it must be your own photograph and it should be taken after the announcement of the theme, no going through your back catalog.
 
^ That sounds like a good set of simple rules. Totally agree.
 
I'd say the only necessary rules are that it must be your own photograph and it should be taken after the announcement of the theme, no going through your back catalog.

That's what normally kills these competitions... But I agree it's what makes more sense.
 
^as long as the theme is generic enough, I don't see a problem,
but if the themes become too narrow down, it can pose a problem to get a picture in the comp. time.
 
I'd be very interested, I'm just getting into photography and things, so this would provide me the perfect opportunity to develop my skills
 
I'd say the only necessary rules are that it must be your own photograph and it should be taken after the announcement of the theme, no going through your back catalog.

How can one prove this? Data can always be manipulated. It's more of an 'Honor' system.

That's what normally kills these competitions... But I agree it's what makes more sense.
Yes, of course would be easy to grab a great shot from a previous shoot. Maybe a mix - as in sometimes from older shots, sometimes from current/after theme announcements?

^As long as the theme is generic enough, I don't see a problem,
But if the themes become too narrow down, it can pose a problem to get a picture in the comp. time.

Yes, same problem again - must have the perfect time-frame (not too long, not too short) and definitely have themes that are generally accessible (i.e. food, children, cars, spectator events, domestic animals, plants, sunsets . . .) as well as rare themes (like eclipses, atoll islands, aerial displays or underwater photography! ;) )

Thanks, TB for the interest and trying to get this off the ground again.👍
 
I'd say the only necessary rules are that it must be your own photograph and it should be taken after the announcement of the theme, no going through your back catalog.
^ That sounds like a good set of simple rules. Totally agree.
That's what normally kills these competitions... But I agree it's what makes more sense.
^as long as the theme is generic enough, I don't see a problem,
but if the themes become too narrow down, it can pose a problem to get a picture in the comp. time.
When I was thinking about starting this comp up, the "only new shots" vs. "anything goes" debate came up. Initially, again in the interest of getting as many to join in as possible, I was fully in favor of the "anything goes" side but I also don't really want shots that people took 6 years ago to be used. The problem then arises as to where the line for how far back is acceptable is drawn. Obviously that's hard to call and then there's the fruitless effort of policing it. That said, it really does only make sense to allow new shots only.
I'd be very interested, I'm just getting into photography and things, so this would provide me the perfect opportunity to develop my skills
Welcome aboard, Pagey! :cheers:
How can one prove this? Data can always be manipulated. It's more of an 'Honor' system.
See above.

And yes, even though it goes against my better judgement, I'm going to just have to trust you guys. :lol:
rare themes (like eclipses, atoll islands, aerial displays or underwater photography! ;) )
Unless there is a lot of demand, I don't see us getting that specific. I don't know about anyone else, but I'm not all that interested in buying either a cheap underwater camera or a waterproof case for my DSLR! :lol:
Thanks, TB for the interest and trying to get this off the ground again.👍
:cheers:
I can totally play if by luck if my sister gets her camera. :lol:
Or you could go buy your own. 💡

Good ideas and discussion so far, guys! Also, I think I've got a pretty decent first theme lined up. :sly:
 
How can one prove this? Data can always be manipulated. It's more of an 'Honor' system.

It would be impossible to prove and anyone could cheat in the contest but it's fraction of what your cheating yourself out of. Besides, cheating doesn't necessarily mean winning.
 
Although my free time is very limited lately, I wouldn't mind joining in on a comp especially when there is enough time given to submit entries.

The previous comp had a very lengthy time period for submissions. This seems to be a double edged sword. Great for giving everyone time to get an entry in, but at the same time with the slow activity of it due to the long submission time, people simply forget to submit without some sort of reminder like a PM or email.

TB
When I was thinking about starting this comp up, the "only new shots" vs. "anything goes" debate came up. Initially, again in the interest of getting as many to join in as possible, I was fully in favor of the "anything goes" side but I also don't really want shots that people took 6 years ago to be used. The problem then arises as to where the line for how far back is acceptable is drawn. Obviously that's hard to call and then there's the fruitless effort of policing it. That said, it really does only make sense to allow new shots only.

I think the best thing to do in a situation like this is to give a limit for older shots like what we had in the Automotive Photography Competition of say no older than 12 months. Naturally there is the issue of policing this, however the way I look at it, most of the participants are long term GTP members and are trustworthy. Also I feel there is no real incentive for a newcomer to cheat if there is no tangible reward.
 
I think the best thing to do in a situation like this is to give a limit for older shots like what we had in the Automotive Photography Competition of say no older than 12 months. Naturally there is the issue of policing this, however the way I look at it, most of the participants are long term GTP members and are trustworthy. Also I feel there is no real incentive for a newcomer to cheat if there is no tangible reward.

These are my thoughts exactly. If a time frame is necessary let it be 6 or 12 months. As for cheating, I assume (:D) the long time members here won't cheat in that sense when taking part.
 
I like having a bit of a range as well, as I can get quite busy sometimes.

Also, I'd rather not see specific themes, like "Family" or "Pets" etc, because a lot of those require some people (myself) to deviate quite a bit from routine and thus less likely to participate. Things that are fairly universal, like "Night" "Day" or moods perhaps I think are easier to do in a variety of situations, with far more creative leeway while still having a core idea.
 
Participation is all conditional, on me getting a DSLR. Until that point I can't actually participate, unless you guys want to see iPhone Camera pictures, which aren't that pleasant.
 
Last edited:
^ What' s behind the camera is just as important, not just the gear. As long as your shot follows the theme, post away. 👍
 
TB
^ What' s behind the camera is just as important, not just the gear. As long as your shot follows the theme, post away. 👍

In that case, the ****** iPhone camera will have to do for now! I will participate then.
 
Good thread, TB - seems like we are not only attracting the right people, but it has also generated the right kind of interest!
Let me - as a somewhat pushy newbie - throw some thoughts in here:

Gear - what does it matter? A box with a pinhole is sometimes better than nothing at all - if you were witnessing the explosion at Bikini Atoll. How about the picture of the naked little girl running down the street after being nalpalmed. Who would remember the camera used - or even the photographer! Some of the most memorable pictures in LIFE magazine, or National Geographic were taken with very ordinary cameras - and the iPhone camera is an exceptionally good camera in comparison. It's all about the subject matter - and the angle of perception used to capture that moment in time - than the technical wizardry. That doesn't mean good gear is not helpful; there was a time capturing an 'action' shot was a mixture of instant serendipity - now at 5 FPS one can catch five different split-second moments of a match flaming into life. So looking at it that way, advanced gear can give one an advantage, but not always. More of a satisfactory achievement knowing you got the shot under difficult circumstances, than that the camera you took it with was a photographic robot.

Time Frame: What time frame are we talking about? Time frame of the entire contest or time frame of each individually segment? A suggestion would be to have a bi-weekly contest, that runs for a year - and then three shots (1st, and two runners-up) as a final year-end vote.

Awards - Obviously there is no tangible reward - Jordan handing out a t-shirt would make this an official GTPlanet contest - and making it official would of course cause various complications. So what reward is there in this? Only passionate photographers may truly understand the satisfaction that comes from capturing (what they think) is a perfect shot. To have the opportunity to showcase that shot and have others appreciate the result is a bonus that goes beyond simple egotism - it is an affirmation of one's active worth, and an incentive to further and more eye-catching, mind-boggling photographic effort.
Judgement of a visual is instintively subjective - votes are mostly cast on a 'I don't know why I like it, but I like it' basis. Very rarely, I would think, that a vote would be cast by a member who is saying to themselves: 'Hmm, this guy followed tha rule of thirds, a light meter has been used, and his ISO setting has captured just the amount of grain needed, etc . . .' So - intrinsically - the satisfaction comes more from even one member saying 'That was a good shot - I'll never forget seeing that picture' than six pixel pundits saying the shot was technically perfect. The award therefore is the opportunity to participate - and be viewed and recognised. Sometimes the true pleasure comes from playing the game - doesn't matter who won - eventually every dog has his day. The pleasure that coms from consistantly participating, and then - even being a 'runner-up' just once - must be experienced to be understood.
And for a photo-dog (my Dutch buddies call me that) what more pleasure that taking photos and showing them off, win or lose?

Cheating: I'll let my kid's hamster address that:
Hamsterface.jpg


Themes:
To help your imagination along a wee bit:
A - Action. Antennae. Apples.
B - Beaches. Butterflies. Beaudacious belles. Bells.
C - Cuddly things. Clouds. Cheese.
D - Diner. Detail. Dusk.
E - Extraodinary tools.
F - Fish. Fraternities. Feathered friends.
G - Gametime. Gadgets. G-Forces.
H - Holiday. Homes-for-sale. Horses. Halloween.
I - Iridescence (goniochromism.)
J - Just leaves, loaves, louvres (and louvers.)
K - Kites!
L - Love. Laughter. Lights. Lichen.
M - Mall life. Monetary transaction. Movie Theatre signage.
N - Nightlife. Numbers game.
O - Outdoor flower/fruit/vegetable market.
P - Policeman. Park bench. Pharaphenelia.
Q - Quaint folk. Queue. Quick shot!
R - Rustic settings. Rocks. Robots. Rainbows. Raindrops. Roses.
S - Sunsets. Stars. Street scenes. Street signs.
T - The one that (almost) got away.
U - Uber umbrellas.
V - Various vittles.
W - Workplace. Walls. Windows. Worshippers.
X - marks the spot.
Y - Yellow. Yelling mouths. Yerks.
Z -Zoom shot! Zebra crossing.

Just to name a few :) - J/K about the Yerks - hard to find those. ;)

Cheers. Regards and my respect to all in the room.
Harry.
 
If I don't forget (I'm rarely on this side of the board) I'd like to participate.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back