- 11,303
- Sweden
- eran0004
I wouldn't think that most people who bought GT6 have the internet, so I doubt that's correct that most players started on 1.01.
So in your opinion, there's nothing wrong with the physics? camber doesn't have any use in the real world? high front ride height promotes oversteer? what about the top speeds of the cars in GT6? they must be accurate too then hey? The moon physics when you roll over? I could go on if you like...
I didn't blame the modelling team for screwing up the physics... I'm not sure how you got that from what I wrote... My problem was with who ever decided that it was important enough to get someone to change that wing, and yet no one at Polyphony Digital feels the countless problems with the physics in GT6 are important enough to fix. Does that explain it in enough detail? Typical PD, ignore any problems with the game, and "fix" what isn't even broken.
You don't think people have their PS3 connected to the internet? I find that hard to believe.
In my opinion there's a lot of things that can be improved, but the physics do work.
Who do you think is more likely to have changed the position of the wing: The people responsible for the physics or the people responsible for the car models?