Is it just me, or are cars getting uglier?

  • Thread starter Shannon
  • 69 comments
  • 2,775 views
well m5...

i apoligize if my "wreckless stupidity" offended you... seems to me to be quite anal... but again i apoligize...

i am sorry... but usually when i post i am in a rush... leaving for class... or just going to sleep...

and in reality my spelling when i type is pretty bad... i rely on spell check too much....

but anyways thanks for taking the time to create a post that explains the different ways in which their they're and there are to be used... i will keep it in mind...
 
Originally posted by M5Power
Typing with reckless stupidity isn't allowed on these forums, and you're quite clearly one of the worst offenders.

I've seen worse then that. I've seen posts that aren't even dechiperable.

Mazkid, I agree with you on Buick. That Rendezous is just a plain rip-off of Pontiac's Aztek(Ugly in its own right). What about Oldsmobile before it was phased out of production? GM made some aweful cars with that brand in recent years(except for the Bravada before 2002.)
 
I have to agree with the fact that cars are getting more and more ugly. It's not that they're really "ugly" it's just they look more and more like one another than they ever did before. All of Nissans front liners are the same engine, the same bodystyle. Honda's Civic+RSX+TSX+MSX+POS whatever, they all have almost the same headlights, and everyone and their mother is including "racing seats" in their car. It's getting a little outrageous, no more originality left in the car world.
 
Originally posted by Matrixhasu77
That Rendezous is just a plain rip-off of Pontiac's Aztek(Ugly in its own right).

Um - they share the same platform, the same engineers, and similar structures. You do realise both are built by GM, right? :odd:
 
Originally posted by Driftster
All of Nissans front liners are the same engine, the same bodystyle. Honda's Civic+RSX+TSX+MSX+POS whatever, they all have almost the same headlights, .

I cannot think of one Nissan which uses the same engine and gets the same output from it.

Additionally I cannot think of one reason why Acura shouldn't be allowed to, like MOST manufacturers (including your favourite, whichever it is), use a corporate grille for product recognition. Not a single make doesn't do it.
 
Originally posted by Klostrophobic
Except when you turn to Ford. They've still got the creativity working.
Creativitiy with what? All 3 of their cars? The Mustang. Oh yeah looks SO different from any other mustang ever. The Ford Lightning! Wow another ford truck with no towing capability, however it has an engine that is GREAT too bad you can't see it from the outside. What else is there The Taures? Wooo
 
Originally posted by Driftster
Creativitiy with what? All 3 of their cars? The Mustang. Oh yeah looks SO different from any other mustang ever. The Ford Lightning! Wow another ford truck with no towing capability, however it has an engine that is GREAT too bad you can't see it from the outside. What else is there The Taures? Wooo

Yeah, their three cars. :odd:

You've just proven your sensibility.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
Um - they share the same platform, the same engineers, and similar structures. You do realise both are built by GM, right? :odd:

To answer your question, yes. I just thought that every once in awhile there ought to be a little bit of originality.
 
Originally posted by Driftster
Creativitiy with what? All 3 of their cars? The Mustang. Oh yeah looks SO different from any other mustang ever. The Ford Lightning! Wow another ford truck with no towing capability, however it has an engine that is GREAT too bad you can't see it from the outside. What else is there The Taures? Wooo

Ford = Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Jaguar, Aston Martin, Volvo, Mazda, and Land Rover.

They have more than three brands. I'm certain, somehow, this must mean more than three models.

Here's just Ford's models: ZX2, Mustang (the only American Muscle car left), Focus, Thunderbird, Taurus, Crown Victoria (the only RWD full sized sedan), Windstar, Explorer, Expedition, Excursion, Escape, Ranger, F150 (250, 350), and the E series Vans.

That's more than three, right?

The Mustang and the Tunderbird have both been in production since they debuted. You can't say this about Camaro, Firebird, Impala, etc. Ford owns GM.
 
Originally posted by milefile
Ford = Ford, Lincoln, Mercury, Jaguar, Aston Martin, Volvo, Mazda, and Land Rover.

They have more than three brands. I'm certain, somehow, this must mean more than three models.

Here's just Ford's models: ZX2, Mustang (the only American Muscle car left), Focus, Thunderbird, Taurus, Crown Victoria (the only RWD full sized sedan), Windstar, Explorer, Expedition, Excursion, Escape, Ranger, F150 (250, 350), and the E series Vans.

That's more than three, right?

The Mustang and the Tunderbird have both been in production since they debuted. You can't say this about Camaro, Firebird, Impala, etc. Ford owns GM.

I wasn't even going to bother correcting this person because his viewpoint was so obviously wrong. Thunderbird, by the way, was cancelled in 1998 and recently revived.
 
Originally posted by Matrixhasu77
That Rendezous is just a plain rip-off of Pontiac's Aztek(Ugly in its own right).
Aha! An excuse to post my favorite picture:

pontiacmath.jpg


To answer your question, yes. I just thought that every once in awhile there ought to be a little bit of originality.
Trust me, based on most things GM has produced in the last 25 years, "originality" is about the last thing you want to see out of them.
 
That's funny. That Aztek is the stupidest vehicle ever. They obviously didn't ask anyone their opinion. I rememebr when somebody won one on Survivor and he was pretty lukewarm about it.
 
Originally posted by milefile
Here's just Ford's models: ZX2, Mustang (the only American Muscle car left), Focus, Thunderbird, Taurus, Crown Victoria (the only RWD full sized sedan), Windstar, Explorer, Expedition, Excursion, Escape, Ranger, F150 (250, 350), and the E series Vans.

That's more than three, right?

That'll be Ford USA...

Add on Ford Europe and you have the Ka (city car), Fiesta (small hatch), Fusion (Fiesta-based SUV), Focus (family hatch, and a Ford Europe original... :D), Mondeo (family saloon), Maverick (SUV), Explorer (bigger SUV, and one of yours we borrowed), Galaxy (people carrier), Ranger (a pick-up) and various Fiesta-shaped small vans.
 
Originally posted by Famine
That'll be Ford USA...

Add on Ford Europe and you have the Ka (city car), Fiesta (small hatch), Fusion (Fiesta-based SUV), Focus (family hatch, and a Ford Europe original... :D), Mondeo (family saloon), Maverick (SUV), Explorer (bigger SUV, and one of yours we borrowed), Galaxy (people carrier), Ranger (a pick-up) and various Fiesta-shaped small vans.

Ford Europe touts and touts the Focus but it was Detroit's idea. You just got it first! :P

By the way, your Maverick is our Escape. They didn't want to call it the Escape in Europe because of confusion with Renault's minivan, the Espace, and because they had previously named small SUVs the "Maverick" and wanted to keep the recognition. You do get the re-badged (better looking) Mazda version with the same name as the US Mazda (Tribute).
 
Let me post some pictures of a few of my wife's knitting projects before you diss knitting...
 
Cars are getting alot uglier. The only new vehicles I like are some of the Nissans, and the Cadillac CTS. The CTS has the futuristic style which is ugly on most cars, but I think it looks sexy on it.

Maybe it's just me, though.
 
Originally posted by Ghost C
Cars are getting alot uglier. The only new vehicles I like are some of the Nissans, and the Cadillac CTS. The CTS has the futuristic style which is ugly on most cars, but I think it looks sexy on it.

Maybe it's just me, though.
I hate this car. And Cadillac has made me hate the song Rock 'n' Roll. I hate it so much now.
 
My grandfather's 1993 black Eldorado was sexy as hell though :/

I don't think they even make Eldorados anymore, and if they do, they're probably fugly.
 
Doug, Nissan uses the 3.5 V6 from the Altima in the Pathfinder and Quest, and I think in the Frontier(one of em anyhoo...doesn't the bottom line Frontier use the Sentra I4?).

About a month ago my grandfather got hit in his '87 Maxima. The car was mint before the wreck, but totalled after it. They have some money cause they go to Vegas every year, and the casinos around here. My dad showed them the Altima and he loved it cause it comes in this Mystic Green that's almost the same color as the GTO he had years and years ago. Also the Altima is, how do you say, softer. Doesn't handel worth a crap but it's cushy. So they took that over the 6S(which I have to admit is more of a sporting car, not something a 75+ year old drives). Also it doesn't matter that's it's a Nissan cause my dad can still get the discounts and parts and everything. I haven't seen the car yet though.

Toyota's deal is that they want all the teen buisness. They approch it through punky and outragous ads(the Matrix and Camry(the one on the highway with it recklessly spinning, ramping, and drifting. On the commercial with the theme park part, at the end you can see the myCar(after decades they finally tell people of the myCar=Camry coincidence...) landing with a mass of sparks under it which shows off the soft suspension and tells people to do this so that Toyota can get more buisness in the service center.). Then they have Scion. The smartest thing they did with Scion is call it Scion, not Toyota, cause if it goes down the poop shoot the Toyota name isn't right there. The rounded Scion is a pretty nice idea, while the Scion Brickmobile is horrible. The good gas mileage the engine gets is cut down by the very un-aerodynamic body. Furthermore, at the autoshow, it was like a "newbies to cars" convention in the Scion area. The youth like spokespeople were iffy, and they gave out shirts to people for answering child like questions like "Which company makes Scions?"(and several people answer "Scion" like dips). They also had a "way too big for 2 small cars" catalog full of crap, and free hip hop music CDs. It was like a K B Toys store with people interested in the cars based on all of the junk Toyota had in the tent with them.

Then there's Honda. Honda use to have great cars years ago like the older Accords(my grandma had a '86 Accord before she bought the, at the time, reginal Mazda rep's '95 626(he's a cool guy, my dad talks to him all the time...he moved years ago but is going to be moving back to STL soon to continue working with Mazda, he had(last time I was at his house when he was in STL) a 323 GTX, a '98 MPV All-Sport(Green/tan 2 tone Doug!), and I don't remember the other Mazda he had...I think it was a Millenia S but I don't remember cause I saw it only once) and Civics. Now it's just wierd. The Accord sedan has upside-down tail lights, and the Coupe has tail lights from a Mercedes. The Civic is still ok, but the Si wants to be a Vitz or Demio or something and it's way too ricy. The Oddessy is a great van but heavy and way expensive. Sure it has 240hp but it's bigger, heavier, and cushier than the 200hp MPV. The S2000 is a good car but nothing over special. Then there's the Element. Like Scion, the people that are wanted to buy them are youths that don't know any better.
Acura in my opinion has gone a tad downhill. They use to be a luxury car company, but now they are appealing to ricers as well. The RSX is good, but it screems rice and many people turn it into that even more. The TSX is a very Mazda 6 like car using Mazda 6 cues. Only problem is that it's got the RSX Type S engine which is underpowered for the TSX and lacks torque. The 6 would blow it away. The other Acuras are pretty mundane.

Then there's Mitsubishi. They have gone downhill in my opinion. The Eclipse is so so, the US spec Lancer(not the Evo) is pretty ugly and slow, the Endevour is odd, the Montero is tipsy and appearantly likes to flip easily, I rarely see any Diamontes or Galants on the road, and thier ads are more pitched to everything in the ad except the cars themselfs.

And then there's who else but Saturn. They are viewed as "cars for losers". Their Ion is horrible. It looks like a PlaySkool toy. It's also slow. And the 3 door is sorta RX-8 like. No one buys the L series. The Vue is an alternitive for people that want an Aztek but have to buy Saturn. Also Saturn use to make thier own engines, but now they use engines from Cavaliers/Sunfires and the V6 is from an Opel(which is probably the best thing in Saturn). The plastic bodys appeared to be a good idea to start with, but, as with a Fusz rental L series my dad had once to go to a Subaru school near Chicago, you want a black or other dark color one. On a white car, the scratches are black. Also the panels have gaps and look like crap. The car also felt(to me...I rode in it with my bro to take it back...we brake-torqued it and the I4 actually had enough power for a millisecond skid) loose and not solid...

I'm done ranting for now.
 
I can't help but point out your missuse of the word Ricy on a couple of occasions, and the fact that I dissagree with a couple of the points you've made.
The Civic is still ok, but the Si wants to be a Vitz or Demio or something and it's way too ricy.

I agree that the civic is "ok", however wanting to be a Vitz or a Demio? If Honda wanted the civic to be a Vitz or a Demio they would have installed a SOHC engine as apposed to the 160HP 2.0l K20 engine. If Honda wanted the Civic to be a Vitz or a Demio they would probably deny the fact that Civic's have not only been competing against, but beating Audi's and BMW's in certain circuts.
The Oddessy is a great van but heavy and way expensive. Sure it has 240hp but it's bigger, heavier, and cushier than the 200hp MPV

I don't know about you, but from what I know and have heard of, people shopping for van's don't sit there and go "Hey, it has 240hp, but it's bigger, and cushier than the MPV, so I don't want it" Usually people buy vans FOR that reason. If people didn't WANT Roominess, and cushiness as you put it. They would probably buy a Sedan instead.
The S2000 is a good car but nothing over special.

You're right, it's nothing over special, however it is a 240HP 4 cylinder RWD sports car that redlines at 9500 RPM. I don't know what you think, but it sure as heck outclasses the other $30,000 dollar cars out there.
Then there's the Element. Like Scion, the people that are wanted to buy them are youths that don't know any better.

The element however is only similar to the Scion in it's very basic shape, the element is bigger, the element has more power, and I didn't know you could hose out a Scion.

The RSX is good, but it screems rice and many people turn it into that even more. The TSX is a very Mazda 6 like car using Mazda 6 cues. Only problem is that it's got the RSX Type S engine which is underpowered for the TSX and lacks torque. The 6 would blow it away. The other Acuras are pretty mundane.

I have to disagree with the whole thing of "The RSX is good" because it's not, its a horrible car, and the fact that they replaced the previous chassis Integra with this one is appauling. Although I don't know what you mean by "it screams rice" it doesn't have a massive spoiler, it's more quiet than a stock infinity G35 by a long shot, it doesn't have oversized rim's and it doesn't have unessicary lighting features. It's pretty basic by automotive standards.
You say the TSX is a very mazda 6 like car, when in fact the Mazda 6 is a very TSX like car. The TSX is nothing more than Honda/Acura's spin off of the CL/TL/RL Series cars, which were FWD V6's just like the Mazda 6, but were out well before the 6.
Yes the TSX does have 20 less horsepower in it's 2.4LK series engine, however the TSX can have the JDM AWD Accords drivetrain implimented on it, and when it's all said and done, the 2.4L honda engine will have a larger aftermarket than a Mazda V6.
Then there's Mitsubishi. They have gone downhill in my opinion. The Eclipse is so so, the US spec Lancer(not the Evo)
I don't understand at all why you excluded the Evo, the Evo is the biggest Mitsubishi dissapointment to date, The evo has a GREAT reputation in the past, and so far every single evo in one aspect or another has been a better car than it's previous model/models e.g. The Evo 6 is better than the evo 5, the Evo 7 is better than the evo 6, however the Evo 7 remains better than the evo 8. The Evo 7 is a statisticly better car than the evo 8.

And the 3 door is sorta RX-8 like.
Actually the RX-8 is "Sorta Saturn like" seeing as how the Saturn debuted the 3rd door long before Mazda unveiled the RX-8
Also Saturn use to make thier own engines, but now they use engines from Cavaliers/Sunfires
I think that is the smartest move saturn has made so far. The modification, and aftermarket on the cavalier engines has tripled in the past couple of years. If Saturn had continued to make it's own engine it still wouldn't be anywhere.

In my opinion the only company that still has their head in the right direction is Nissan. Not only did they manage to discontinue 2 of the hottest cars from japan in the same year (Skyline & Silvia) and remain on top. They managed to develop the magnificent engine the VQ35DE, this engine which has a firm grasp on the motorsports industry, even swaying skyline fans to replace their engines with this V6 powerplant. The only problem i've seen from them is them using the EXACT same engine(spec's and all) for both the 350Z and the G35, not only that, but the G35 sounds horrible stock. I mean BAAAADDD


---edit---

whoa...
 
I was talking about the Ion 3 door, not the S series coupe from the '90s. Ofcourse I know that the 3rd door design was not started by the RX-8. However, the Ion 3 door resembles the RX-8.

Also, the Mazda Atenza design came out well before the TSX. I'm not talking about the TSX's predecessors. Also, I never mentioned aftermarket cause I personally don't like or recommend modding any car. Also you say that the AWD can be implemented...and in Japan they have an AWD Atenza Wagon. You can put the AWD on the 6. You can do a lot of stuff. I could put the 3.0L from the 6 in the Mazda 3. I could buy a new Mazda 323 in South Africa and put many of the parts on my '88 323.

The MPV seats the same amount as the Oddessy, yet costs considerably less and is more nimble. The current Oddessy's design is aging.

The S2000's red line is at 9,000 RPM...same with the RX-8, and the RX-8 is the only current rotary powered vehicle on sale in the world. Seating for 4 in comfort too.

When saying that the Si wants to be a vitz or Demio, I meant in looks. Sure it's faster, but I think that Honda should have made the car more sleek. Like a '93 Civic 3 door. Also, Proteges have done very well in the Speedworld Challenge against BMWs and Integras/RSXs. What's the difference?

Also, while the Element can be "hosed out", I've never ever had a need to use water to clean the inside of a car. I cleaned up the MPV for our trip to Texas by simply using compressed air, taking the floormats out, blowing all of the dirt out of them, just putting them back in. What ever happened to people keeping thier cars clean to begin with?
 
Originally posted by MazKid
Doug, Nissan uses the 3.5 V6 from the Altima in the Pathfinder and Quest, and I think in the Frontier(one of em anyhoo...doesn't the bottom line Frontier use the Sentra I4?).


Re-read what I said about 'output' and get back to me.

Quest was cancelled with the 2003 model year.


I'm done ranting for now.
I would respond but there's too much to respond to. :P
 
Originally posted by MazKid
Doesn't handel worth a crap but it's cushy.


I had an '02, it handled extremely well for a family sedan. Not as well as the 6S probably, but after driving a Cressida and several Camrys it was a breath of fresh air.

Toyota's deal is that they want all the teen buisness.

The teen market is absolutely huge, so they're right to go after it in any way they can, Scion included.

a '98 MPV All-Sport(Green/tan 2 tone Doug!),

I'll take six.

The Accord sedan has upside-down tail lights, and the Coupe has tail lights from a Mercedes.

Yeah - what are they doing stealing tails from one of the most recognisable luxury manufacturers ever?! I would normally join you in Honda-bashing, but the Accord V6 is powerful as all hell. I'll take four.

The Oddessy is a great van but heavy and way expensive. Sure it has 240hp but it's bigger, heavier, and cushier than the 200hp MPV.

Is it heavy? :P

The TSX is a very Mazda 6 like car using Mazda 6 cues. Only problem is that it's got the RSX Type S engine which is underpowered for the TSX and lacks torque. The 6 would blow it away. The other Acuras are pretty mundane.

The TSX handles like no other (sorry, but yes, better than the 6). The only way you can attack it and get to it is by saying it steals from Mazda, which it doesn't; the TSX was out just a few weeks after the 6 in Europe as the Accord.

the Endevour is odd,

The Endeavour kicks ass. Probably the only half-decent product they've come up with since the Evo first began. I do find it funny for a company that makes TVs that the rear DVD system on the Endeavour won't be out for another four months.

the Montero is tipsy and appearantly likes to flip easily,

:rolleyes:

It's a kickass car that is being given a re-design too early because of crap like this. It flips when making right-angle turns at 40+ mph. When was the last time you made a right-angle turn at 40+? It's really easy - if the car's going too fast, don't make the turn. Consumer Reports is a bad magazine, but they singly put the Montero out of business, and for this I hate them.

And the 3 door is sorta RX-8 like.

Mazda might have actually gotten the idea from Saturn on this one.

Bah, I responded.
 
Well actually, in the Yamaguchi RX-8 book, Mazda took a Saturn SC 3 door for inspiration. They changed the design though. In the Saturn you have to leab out to close the door. In the RX-8 you mearly grab the handel with ease and put the door closed. I did it. But look at the back door design of the RX-8 against the Ion 3 door.

Doug, we've gone around 90 degree corners at about 45mph in the MPV, with tire squeal and all. Sure there's body roll, but it never felt like it would flip.
Though the Montero cirtainly isn't in the Econoline's class of flipage.

Wait, the flip down DVD won't be out for months? WTF? Mazda has had them in the MPV for years. And Mitsu shows it in one of thier commercials. False advertisement!
 
Back