It's true: Ford sells Jaguar and Land Rover for 2.3 Billion..

  • Thread starter High-Test
  • 34 comments
  • 1,591 views
4,735
Israel
Kansas City, MO
FlyingAGasoline
CNN money
Automaker announces deal to sell luxury brands to India's Tata Motors; Ford says sale will close by the end of next quarter.
EMAIL | PRINT | digg DIGG | RSS RSS
Subscribe to Companies
google my aol my msn my yahoo! netvibes
feed://rss.cnn.com/rss/money_news_companies.rss
Paste this link into your favorite RSS desktop reader
See all CNNMoney.com RSS FEEDS (close)
Last Updated: March 26, 2008: 9:26 AM EDT

Million-dollar Fordvideo
Million-dollar Ford
More Videos

DETROIT (AP) -- Ford Motor Co. announced Wednesday that it has agreed to sell British automakers Jaguar and Land Rover to India's Tata Motors Ltd. in a deal that will net the struggling U.S. automaker about $1.7 billion - roughly a third of the price it paid for the two luxury brands.

Tata Motors said the acquisitions would extend its reach around the globe.

The agreement had been in the works for months as cash-strapped Ford sought money to fund its turnaround plan.

Deal will close next quarter. Ford said the sale would close by the end of next quarter, at which point Tata Motors would hand over $2.3 billion in cash. However, at the close of the sale, Ford said it would contribute about $600 million to pension plans.

Ford also said it would continue to supply the two brands with automobile components "for differing periods," and provide environmental and other technologies, as well as engineering support.

Official hails deal. Roger Maddison, an official with Unite, Jaguar and Land Rover's main labor union, said the deal is good news for the automakers' employees as well as those who work for parts suppliers.

"Unite has secured written guarantees for all five UK plants on staffing levels, employee terms and conditions, including pensions, and sourcing agreements. The sale ensures our members' futures, and we look forward to working with Tata," Maddison said in a statement.

Tata Chairman Ratan N. Tata said his company will try to build on the brands' heritage, keeping their identities intact.

"We aim to support their growth, while holding true to our principles of allowing the management and employees to bring their experience and expertise to bear on the growth of the business," he said in a statement.

Ford paid $2.5 billion in '89. The U.S. automaker bought Jaguar for $2.5 billion in 1989 and Land Rover for $2.7 billion in 2000. But it has been struggling and wants to focus on its main brands.

"Now, it is time for Ford to concentrate on integrating the Ford brand globally, as we implement our plan to create a strong Ford Motor Company that delivers profitable growth for all," Ford CEO Alan Mulally said in a statement.

Ford (F, Fortune 500) shares rose 8 cents to $6.08 in premarket trading Wednesday. Its shares have traded in a 52-week range of $4.95 to $9.70. To top of page
First Published: March 26, 2008: 8:11 AM EDT

Tata buys into trouble

Can U.S. carmakers ride out a recession?

Tata? Where'd that one come from? :odd:
 
I thought Tata had been the front runners since the potential sale was announced?
 
I'm baffled that Ford managed to fail with Jaguar and Land Rover. How the hell does that happen? I'm serious... does anyone know?


M
 
I'm baffled that Ford managed to fail with Jaguar and Land Rover. How the hell does that happen? I'm serious... does anyone know?

Jag and Land Rover still had plenty of unwanted baggage with them, left over from the British Leyland days, when Ford bought them. Apathy was probably still rife within the factories.

Having said that, most of the Jags, Land Rovers and Range Rovers built and conceived during Ford ownership have been pretty good/successful.
 
I'll look at it this way:

As long as the British management stays in and the cars continue to be designed and built in England I could honestly care less where the money comes from. Tata, from what I understand, is a very strong company with a lot of money behind it. Things could go from decent to better shortly, I hope.

Although there have been rumors that Land Rover may get sold-off as well after Tata holds them for a bit...

====

And it sounds like Ford is doing a complete dump, which is surprising. They held onto 20% of Aston Martin when they let them go. One wonders what exactly Tata will do if Ford doesn't want to continue the parts supply deals... I know Aston is already looking to Mercedes for some stuff.
 
The Chinese have taken over the world...

If you listen carfully you can hear the screams of 1,000's of Bitish workers scream in agony of now being owned by Indians. :lol:
 
JCE
If you listen carfully you can hear the screams of 1,000's of Bitish workers scream in agony of now being owned by Indians. :lol:

Oh the Irony!! :sly:

I seriously think TATA will do a good job, they are a serious player now and they have the resources and cash to make great changes, unlike Ford who can't even pay for their own heating at the moment!

Robin
 
I could see this becoming a quite promising relationship so long as Tata keeps their noses out for the most part. I'm curious to see who would buy Land Rover off of Tata. It is interesting to see a company making some of the more cheap cars out there in charge of two class-leading brands.

JCE
If you listen carfully you can hear the screams of 1,000's of Bitish workers scream in agony of now being owned by Indians. :lol:

:lol:
 
it's not 100% sold...that will probably take another 1 - 2 years with accounting and all other things crossed over.

I wish TATA good luck and a similar success as Prodrive is having with Aston.
 
I could see this becoming a quite promising relationship so long as Tata keeps their noses out for the most part. I'm curious to see who would buy Land Rover off of Tata. It is interesting to see a company making some of the more cheap cars out there in charge of two class-leading brands.



:lol:

Your wrong. This is a time to be happy as this will probably save the two brands.
 
It's one thing owning the two, but if TATA goes in and tells what the two companies need to build, then we may run into problems. I don't see them doing that too much though.
 
According to the internet, things are already looking up, up, up!

Autoblog
With the sale of Jaguar and Land Rover really, truly official, it hasn't taken long for every automotive news outlet to come out with its own take on the future of both storied marques.

Autoweek distilled Jaguar and Land Rover's product offerings over the next eight years into about 800 words, beginning with the 2009 Jaguar XFR and XKR. According to its sources, both of these high-performance cats will be powered by all-new 5.0-liter, direct-injected V8s, with the naturally aspirated version producing 380 hp and the supercharged variant knocking on the 500 hp ceiling. Jag is expected to fit the new ZF seven-speed automatic 'box to both models, while the Range Rover and Range Rover Sport will get a mild facelift and benefit from the duo of upgraded powerplants.

Come 2010, the Jag XJ will get an XF-inspired facelift, but will still maintain its regal lines and luxo-cruiser status. The X-type will finally meet its timely demise, while the LR3 will get a nip and a tuck along with the aforementioned 380-hp, 5.0-liter DI V8. By 2011, the LRX will make its production debut, with a possible hybrid version coming later in its lifecycle, along with a seven-seat variant in 2012. That same year, Tata is hoping to release a successor to the F-Type. Based off either the XF or XK platform, the two-seat sports car may finally realize the concept that we saw back in 2000. After that, it's all about refreshes and new variations, including an XF coupe, a new Range Rover that will be chock full of luxuries and carrying a hefty price tag ($200k?!), along with all-new versions of the XF, XJ, Range Rover, and finally, a seriously revised Defender that could underpin the next LR3.

AutoCar's take on the future of Jag and LR is a similar story, with less prognostication about products and more about business practices and platform sharing. You can read all three articles by following the source links below.
 
I'm baffled as to Ford's failure with the two. When Ford bough Jaguar, they were still making 20 year old XJS', to such a low standard that "one could see the differences in the panel shapes on each side of the car." Then Ford spends a few billion on Jag to make it competitive (how British Leyland sucker punched Ford so hard in the first place is a mystery to me), only to realize that people still don't want the things. Then they sell it at a loss compared to what it was worth when all of the cars were held together by shoelaces.

Land Rover is even funnier, considering it was BMW who played Ford in this case by being the one who spent the money to completely turn the company around, then sold it off at a loss. And then, Ford can't sell them either. It makes me wonder if there is just something inherently wrong with British company ownership. At least Ford still has Volvo. Those seem to sell, thankfully.
 
I'm baffled as to Ford's failure with the two. When Ford bough Jaguar, they were still making 20 year old XJS', to such a low standard that "one could see the differences in the panel shapes on each side of the car." Then Ford spends a few billion on Jag to make it competitive (how British Leyland sucker punched Ford so hard in the first place is a mystery to me), only to realize that people still don't want the things. Then they sell it at a loss compared to what it was worth when all of the cars were held together by shoelaces.

You really think Jaguar is in a shambles now? I think they're far better than they've ever been. Most of the press agrees. The XK, while antiquated in concept, has been heavily modernized to the point where it's actually modern. The XJ is...well, it's an XJ. But the XF really is a new idea (if by "new" we mean "new for Jaguar after 40 years"). It's *good* inside, and outside. They finally dumped the X-Type (a good idea) and the horrifically ancient-looking-but-good-on-the-inside S-Type. I think things are looking up for Jaguar.

Toronado
Land Rover is even funnier, considering it was BMW who played Ford in this case by being the one who spent the money to completely turn the company around, then sold it off at a loss. And then, Ford can't sell them either. It makes me wonder if there is just something inherently wrong with British company ownership. At least Ford still has Volvo. Those seem to sell, thankfully.

Land Rover's in the same condition as Jaguar. It, too, has drastically turned itself around. It's actually reached "pimp status" of sorts. Not quite the same as the Escalade, but really, what could?

What I think trips people up about British cars is the long-held belief that they're rustbuckets waiting to happen, and that they along with the Italian brands spend more time in the shop rather than on the road. This is certainly true (of both countries) throughout the 1970's and 80's, and is definitely the direct cause of their exit from the US by the mid-1990's. Still, it's only been a few years since both have been worth buying. Both companies will possibly need decades of good press before they really start a good run.
 
You really think Jaguar is in a shambles now?
No, you misunderstand. When Ford bought Jaguar, they were a total pit that British Leyland tricked Ford into dramatically overpaying for. Its just that I find it funny that Ford spent billions to make Jaguar world class again, then sell it for less than what they bought it for anyways.
 
Lets see what Tata can do then, they don't seem to have too bad a business history.

Maybe they could make Land Rovers REAL off-road vehicles, as opposed to leather-lined behemoths that will never leave tarmac. Jaguar may end up being a lower-cost alternative to prestige brands in India, and, if all goes extremely well, to the rest of the world. But that's a bit optimistic for now.
 
I never saw that one coming...

It will be interesting to see how this works for Jaguar and Land Rover. Don't know if it's been mentioned but Ford still have to supply engines for the next 7 years (when talking with my Dad about this, he was up at Jaguar a couple of weeks back about engine sprockets) for Jaguar and Land Rover. I will check the details again tonight, but I think I've got that right.
 
Maybe they could make Land Rovers REAL off-road vehicles, as opposed to leather-lined behemoths that will never leave tarmac.
You're joking right?

Even the Range Rover Sport is a fairly compitent off-roader when it isn't fitted with low profile tyres.
 
You're joking right?

Yes, I am... sort of. I mean just making a less expensive alternative of their current vehicles (more or less) that can get India motoring. By leather-lined, I mean it in the literal sense. The people of India could actually use a vehicle of the Land Rover's dimensions and quality more than people of other countries.
 
Yeah... just reduce the Defender's price to something close to reasonable... there's a good reason that it's an off-road icon.

But I digress... Land Rover's perennial problem has been build quality and perceived reliability issues... something that didn't really improve under BMW... or under Ford... if it can improve under Tata... maybe Land Rover will go somewhere...

But beyond that, what good news is there for Land Rover? The only dynamic hit they've had recently is the Range Rover Sport, and that's because Ford's suspension tuning wizards went over it with a fine-toothed comb... without that kind of input (which is also what has made Jaguar such a contender with their recent models... whether they be drop-dead gorgeous (XK) or BMW-blech (XF)) who knows what'll happen?

But you never know... Lotus's finest years as of late have been under Proton... a company only 1/100th as successful or profitable as Tata... and with the engineering know-how of... well, metaphors fail me... :lol:
 
Yes, I am... sort of. I mean just making a less expensive alternative of their current vehicles (more or less) that can get India motoring. By leather-lined, I mean it in the literal sense. The people of India could actually use a vehicle of the Land Rover's dimensions and quality more than people of other countries.
It's true that Defenders aren't all that cheap but its also important to realise that this hasn't stopped exporters to Africa dominating the second-hand Defender market. Perhaps Defenders will be made in India in the future.
 
No, you misunderstand. When Ford bought Jaguar, they were a total pit that British Leyland tricked Ford into dramatically overpaying for. Its just that I find it funny that Ford spent billions to make Jaguar world class again, then sell it for less than what they bought it for anyways.

Yes, I misunderstood. I, too, think it's ridiculous that it was a huge money pit for Ford. But, hey, whatever gets the big cat moving again. Ford could probably repeat that process three times and not disappear, but without Ford having bought them, I doubt Jaguar would be here today.
 
Jaguar (and Land Rover) were down at Ketlon (my Dads' work) today to look at the potential of using them as a supplier of sprockets for a 5L V8 (NA and Supercharged versions) and one of the Jaguar guys was saying the deal hasn't gone through as yet, end of May he reckoned for the 'real deal'.
 
Thats exceptionally good news! I'm glad to hear that Tata wants to keep jobs in the UK, a damn shame companies here can't do the same...
 
Back