- 7,830
- U S A
- Tetsumura
- Nigel Fox
It says a lot about the state of Human beings in this new enlightened age. It's why I'm more interested in aliens lately.surly it says something does it not ?
It says a lot about the state of Human beings in this new enlightened age. It's why I'm more interested in aliens lately.surly it says something does it not ?
Oh boo hoo lol - also thanks for the loaded poll options. And the term review bong! Maybe you should hit a bong a chill outWell I've signed up to meta critic and given my 0 score review.
Unfortunately, the situation’s not much better even if you enjoy the single-player side. The number of races that give a respectable amount of credits can be counted on one hand (because making events like the 1 hour Spa race and Sardegna WTC 800 at more tracks seems to be an enormous task to PD for some weird reason) and custom race payouts are still an utter joke.When online racing earns you fewer credits per hour than your oil changes are going to cost (slight hyperbole there, but only slight), it's not going to lead to a lot of fun when you only have a couple of hours a week to play. I like sport mode and lobbies, but ignoring the problems with those modes (I mean PD certainly has), they're the only fun I have in GT7. But the payouts are ****ing awful. So I afk for my creds during the day, and race Sport in the evening. If I had to do it PD's way, I just wouldn't play.
Ah predictive text... clearly i use the word bong more often than bomb. Which should be kind of reassuring, particularly in this day and age, that I'm more likely to chill out than blow you up. 😁Oh boo hoo lol - also thanks for the loaded poll options. And the term review bong! Maybe you should hit a bong a chill out
That's true, no modern Gran Turismo game has ever been improved from fan requests till that happened.You guys realize that without the original review bombing, we'd still be stuck with a 1.07 style grind right?
The going rate is seven titles for fan requests.That's true, no modern Gran Turismo game has ever been improved from fan requests till that happened.
/megasnark
Leaving a bad review for a bad experience is dishonest and childish?To me review bombing is pretty dishonest and childish, I didn’t even do it to BF2042 and that was a much larger disaster than GT7.
poo suit on
Yes giving the game a 0 is dishonest and childish, this is why no one takes user scores seriously.Leaving a bad review for a bad experience is dishonest and childish?
The 'industry' only adopted the term review bombing to shame consumers for actually standing up to bad practices... This 'review bombing' the OP is talking about has nothing to do with the childish console wars leaving low reviews for games on 'competitor' systems they don't even own.
OP purchased the game, played it long enough to form a valid opinion. If that opinion isn't the one PD was looking for, it's on them.
Anyway, if you meant the original form of review bombing games you never played, than you're absolutely right, dishonest and childish. If you have bought and played BF2042 and had issues with the game, you were in your full right to leave a bad review.
Same goes for all the 10 ratings...Yes giving the game a 0 is dishonest and childish, this is why no one takes user scores seriously.
Well duh, the people giving it a 10 are delusional but they are in the same ball park as the ones giving it 0, they are just on the opposite team.Same goes for all the 10 ratings...
I don't think PD are going to care that 25 people aren't playing anymore.Don't review bomb again, just stop playing it. Engagement numbers is all they care about. If they start falling off a cliff they'll be more inclined to do something about it.
Where did 25 come from? I was just speaking generally out into the ether. If anyone is not happy with the state of the game, stop playing it. It's the best message they can send. If it turns out to be enough people, they'll notice.I don't think PD are going to care that 25 people aren't playing anymore.
I agree with this. AT this point review bombing is not going to work but if there is a significant drop of users they will notice thatDon't review bomb again, just stop playing it. Engagement numbers is all they care about. If they start falling off a cliff they'll be more inclined to do something about it.
The first option of the poll has 25 votes.Where did 25 come from? I was just speaking generally out into the ether. If anyone is not happy with the state of the game, stop playing it. It's the best message they can send. If it turns out to be enough people, they'll notice.
It's already happened though, it went from 8 or whatever it was at to 2. That caused all the media outlets to make articles, videos, and such. Because let's be clear, that's all Sony/PD actually cared about. The wider negative coverage of the bombing, where millions of people may learn about the games issues that had no idea about metacritic. They didn't actually care about the low score, and probably engagement numbers of people playing the game didn't drop very much. If anything it probably climbed, given it was still very early in sales.25 bad reviews is worse for them than 25 people not playing.. For the record, I've never review bombed anything. But this game definitely deserves it. They don't care about going from 9.2 to 7.8. But going from 9.2 to 1.6 actually made a difference. Those of you who don't understand that are as blind as GT7's UX/UI developer.
If something is not fit for purpose, for your purpose, as in, can't host leagues in GT7, then a zero is justified.Well duh, the people giving it a 10 are delusional but they are in the same ball park as the ones giving it 0, they are just on the opposite team.
In my school (a loooong time ago) if you got zero it meant you got everything wrong. As an example, ten questions with ten wrong answers = zero/ten.Like if you get a 0 on a school test for example, that just means you didn’t show up or didn’t even attempt it. GT7 showed up, or at least I think it did.
Tonight has been nothing short of an annoying, abysmal experience. Blue...blue...blue screens everywhere. If it's not frustration with having the game crash after leaving a lobby, then it's got to be the poor quality connection issues producing laggy racers and a very poor experience when I could actually join a race. What's equally as infuriating is the linear design game interface; having to go through several screens to 'try' buying tyres in time for that lobby race just adds more misery, slowing an already laboured user experience. Why in the world can I not see whether a race has started???Just had my 9th blue screen today when exiting a lobby that is already in a race... that I couldn't tell was already in a race because that feature has been removed.
Seeing as it seems to make PD pull their finger out and that I haven't submitted a review, I think it's time to see if we can get GT7 a well deserved 1/10.
While one might not take single 0 review seriously, when there are hundreds or thousands of 0 or low score reviews then you do tend to take notice as something is clearly going on.Yes giving the game a 0 is dishonest and childish, this is why no one takes user scores seriously.
No sooner did I post my grievances with this game, I just noticed a server update scheduled for 6/9. Let's hope good things are on the horizon!Tonight has been nothing short of an annoying, abysmal experience. Blue...blue...blue screens everywhere. If it's not frustration with having the game crash after leaving a lobby, then it's got to be the poor quality connection issues producing laggy racers and a very poor experience when I could actually join a race. What's equally as infuriating is the linear design game interface; having to go through several screens to 'try' buying tyres in time for that lobby race just adds more misery, slowing an already laboured user experience. Why in the world can I not see whether a race has started???
In addition, why can we not use brake balance control in sport mode, however TC remains fully adjustable??? Whilst I'm on this subject, both TC and ABS switch on even though I've elected not to use either assist. I know this is a bug, but still...very annoying.
I would love to believe that PD are listening, are aware, are planning to make changes to what could be a great game but the poor experience is further compounded by releasing a product that really does seem half baked, poorly planned and executed. I get that trying to optimize the game across generations is difficult; what PD has achieved graphically on PS4 has impressive, but I can't help but feel disappointed, demotivated and generally tired with the overall GT7 experience. The single player experience needs improving too; AI performance leaves a lot to be desired, especially based on their ability to take me out if I dare to get in their way. It's like driving with the worst of the worst online players. I believe updates to improve online lobbies/single player modes are coming, but when PD...WHEN? They can't come soon enough!