John Titor: Is it the truth or a hoax?

[Johnnypenso]

If any of you guys are actually from the future, can you tell us what is going to happen with GT7 and beyond? Just call it "hypothetical" and we'll all get it..

 

[Robin]

Have they actually done it? Last I heard they were trying, but I haven't heard that they actually succeeded in creating microscopic black holes.

Have you got a link or something so I can read more about it? I like that sort of stuff.

I think there was a belief that microscopic black holes were created for fractions of a second during the successful run when they found the Higgs Boson but it was never officially confirmed, sorry. When they ramp up the power for the next test more recordable black holes might be created. Frankly any black hole which sticks around for longer than a millisecond is worrying!

 

[PeterJB]

If any of you guys are actually from the future, can you tell us what is going to happen with GT7 and beyond? Just call it "hypothetical" and we'll all get it..

All the special events are MX-5s at Tsukuba.

 

[Imari]

I think there was a belief that microscopic black holes were created for fractions of a second during the successful run when they found the Higgs Boson but it was never officially confirmed, sorry. When they ramp up the power for the next test more recordable black holes might be created.

Recordable?

This isn't a videotape where you're getting bad reception. Those experiments generate staggering amounts of data. The problem is not recording what's going on, it's differentiating one bit from all the other things going on at the same time.

It's easy to see a fart in a bathtub, it's a lot harder in a jacuzzi.

This is another case of Titor's predictions being wrong. It didn't happen when he said, and it hasn't happened yet. Discoveries in a supercollider are statistical things. The LHC may have been making Higgs bosons for years but it's not announced as a discovery until they've collected data to prove it to a reasonable standard. Likewise, they may have been making micro black holes since day one, but it's not a discovery until they can prove that they're there.

http://www.dailygalaxy.com/my_weblog/2010/12/cerns-lhc-experiments-nix-nano-black-holes.html

Frankly any black hole which sticks around for longer than a millisecond is worrying!

Any black hole that stuck around for a millisecond would be massive, and therefore well outside the range of any supercollider that could be built by humanity in the forseeable future. At least under all current understandings of how black holes should work.

Seriously, it's not actually possible to make a world destroying black hole with our super colliders unless basically everything we know about physics is massively wrong.

 

[Johnnypenso]

All the special events are MX-5s at Tsukuba.

Really going out on a limb with that prediction

 

[BobK]

It's easy to see a fart in a bathtub, it's a lot harder in a jacuzzi.

That's sig-worthy.

 

[Johnnypenso]

That's sig-worthy.

I agree

 

[niky]

If any of you guys are actually from the future, can you tell us what is going to happen with GT7 and beyond? Just call it "hypothetical" and we'll all get it..

By 2025, PD will finally release the last pack converting GT7's Standard models to Premium, along with a patch that allows you to invite friends via Facebook, with 250,000 credits added to your GT7 account for every invite.

Sadly, nobody has used Facebook since the great Social Media Crash of 2015. Everyone's on Friendster 2.0 now.

Seriously, it's not actually possible to make a world destroying black hole with our super colliders unless basically everything we know about physics is massively wrong.

Looking it up... apparently it's not even possible, period.

Shame.