- 27,222
- United Kingdom
I presume you're referring to the Mini?You cold argue, that as a car for fun the Metro was considerably worse than the car it in some ways replaced, but was discontinued after the Metro.
It's worth noting that in the UK at least, the classic Mini actually outlived the Metro - 2000 vs 1997 - though for the last 15 years of its life it was arguably trading on nostalgia more than anything else, and at launch the Metro was highly rated (albeit by the British press, who a few mags aside, were perhaps a little biased).
By the time the Rover version came out it was definitely getting on a bit, and by the time it was rebranded as Rover 100 it was positively ancient, but its handling and performance were pretty good by contemporary standards throughout its life. I suspect - having seen the Youtube vids - that widespread crash testing by Euro NCAP was the final nail in its coffin, when everyone suddenly realised that a design from the 1970s/1980s wasn't that safe in an accident. Again, the classic Mini probably got a free pass for a few years on nostalgic value.
I have reasonably fond memories of Metros as a few relatives have owned them, as well as one being the first car of my best mate. By the standards of modern small cars, they may be hilariously cramped, unsafe and unrefined, but they're now old enough to be a unique, entertaining driving experience in their own right.
And of course, as mentioned, they did lend their components to some interesting production vehicles and kit cars. That sort of thing isn't so easy nowadays.