- 9,554
- Vermont
- catamount39
The parts I think are lazy are the Aventador engine cover and squished Huracan nose. The back though...It looks like an amalgamation of every Lamborghini model manufactured in the last 10 years. It just looks...wrong.
The parts I think are lazy are the Aventador engine cover and squished Huracan nose. The back though...It looks like an amalgamation of every Lamborghini model manufactured in the last 10 years. It just looks...wrong.
I disagree with your statement that being stupid is an excuse for being ugly, especially when the supposed insanity is coming from a watered down cliche of jet fighter styling. For me, the perfect example of what a modern Lamborghini should really be is the Murcielago SV because that is imposing, beautiful and very Lamborghini, that should be the watermark for current Lamborghini design but they've decided it's better to beat a dead horse with their traditional V12 cars (Aventador, Aventador SV, Veneno, this) and go for, fairly ironically, the safe option of being an overstyled piece of crap whos only purposes in life are to be bought by either rich collectors or sons of rich Saudi Sheiks to show off to girls in the vein hope of sleeping with them.Lamborghini's aren't supposed to be beautiful, they're supposed to look like things that you'd put rockets/missiles and laser beams on. When was the last time a Lamborghini could be called "beautiful" (barring the Miura)? They're just supposed to be insane. And in all, it's not that horrifying. There have been MUCH WORSE cars in terms of looks (2016 Toyota Prius, Toyota Mirai, that Puma thing, Pontiac Aztec, etc.).
Lamborghini's aren't supposed to be beautiful, they're supposed to look like things that you'd put rockets/missiles and laser beams on.
FrzGT
I disagree with your statement that being stupid is an excuse for being ugly, especially when the supposed insanity is coming from a watered down cliche of jet fighter styling. For me, the perfect example of what a modern Lamborghini should really be is the Murcielago SV because that is imposing, beautiful and very Lamborghini, that should be the watermark for current Lamborghini design but they've decided it's better to beat a dead horse with their traditional V12 cars (Aventador, Aventador SV, Veneno, this) and go for, fairly ironically, the safe option of being an overstyled piece of crap whos only purposes in life are to be bought by either rich collectors or sons of rich Saudi Sheiks to show off to girls in the vein hope of sleeping with them.
No, because they're never designed to be fashion statements.Isn't that basically EVERY Supercar/Hypercar in recent memory?
No, because they're never designed to be fashion statements.
Which isn't my point at all. What I'm saying is that modern Lamborghinis are designed as a fashion statement, rather than ending up as one.Thing is, they end up having that exact same thing happen. There's enough videos on YouTube to back that up, so much you could make a entire movie out of them.
Egoista... I've seen it in person.0/10 Not mad enough.
![]()
What's it celebrating? 40 years of generic sci-fi styling? The more I look at it, the worse it gets.
The only thing to redeem this mess would be a Feisar livery, which I'll be inclined to do if it ends up polluting Forza.
Why not take a random car and do that anyways? Good idea there.
I love how the splitter says "no step"... like really??![]()
Explain the Miura.
The narrative that Lamborghini's have to look like jet fighters is pretty damaging to the company's future and design diversity, in my opinion.
Wouldn't that have been the Asterion? Or perhaps the Estoque? Lamborghini does a bad job of making cars that real humans would want to buy, in my book. With Porsche, Audi, and Bentley all in the same market space, it is hard for them to do what (as you point out) is the right thing to do. I mean, maybe in a post-Urus world, it could happen.
When was the last time a Lamborghini could be called "beautiful" (barring the Miura)?