- 1,579
*McLaren*Lamborghini doesn't. It's because of VAG's ownership that makes 'em. It's never really been a one-man up ordeal, because Ferrari has had them covered every way. Yes, Lamborghini started trying with the Diablo, but that was when Ferruccio made the remark that the Diablo completely changed the company's way.
VAG is only doing what Ferruccio never wanted. Competing for the best.
Whaaaat? Every other company says each and every one of theirs cars is best in class, best at something, best at being lied about...whatever. But it's every other company. Why is it only Ferruccio has this unique idea about not being the best? It defies logic. If it were true, Lamborghini would have never made it past the Miura, back when Lamborghini was 100% Ferruccio. Here's a quick review of the Miura's launch:
http://www.pistonheads.com/doc.asp?c=52&i=10585
Point out the part where Ferruccio tried to be second best or worse. If you didn't read it, here's a clip:
Not that Lamborghini was always impressed with Maranellos cars, nor their autocratic creator. One story suggests that Lamborghinis Ferrari had a noisy gearbox. When he complained, Enzo replied that Lamborghini should stick to tractors and let him worry about sports cars. Another tale is that Ferruccio spotted components on his Ferraris that he was also using on his tractors, but that spares cost three times as much - and he realised that there was money to be made building sports cars.
Whether either story is true is open to doubt, but its certainly true that Lamborghini decided to take on Ferrari at its own game.
I think that kind of sums up two things right here. Ferruccio thought that he could do better, and that the primary competitor was Ferrari. Both of these facts totally invalidate what you're trying to express.
I think that unless you plan on being alone on this topic, you should try to back up your opinion with some kind of evidence.