The Toyota 3.5, duh. I prefer my engines to actually work when I need them and be long-term reliable with easy and inexpensive maintenance.In-thread-poll.
Which one would you get? Consider everything. Taxes, insurance, fuel consumption, fun, etc ...
- The AMG version
- The 3.5L V6 version.
It's something new and refreshing... I think they could sell a good number of them for the first couple model years. But, ultimately, the little Lotus will never have the same kind of broad appeal as a Porsche and soon enough everyone who wants one will have one and the sales will probably flatline.Wait, this thing is actually coming to America?
3.5 V6 with a 6 speed. It's a shame we probably won't see many of them, as most people in the market for a sportscar still flock to the Cayman.
Source.2022- Lotus Emira (07-2021 There is stil a possibility EMIRA will use M133 version of the AMG 2.0 - 265 kW version)
Engine Specification
Everything about Emira is for the drivers, including the engine. Emira will offer two powertrains built to deliver blistering performance and maximum thrills. This includes the much-loved and characterful 3.5-litre supercharged V6 and the world’s most powerful production 4 cylinder engine developed in conjunction with AMG and tuned to deliver a heart-racing 360hp.
Lotus website says 360hp and wikipedia says 360 ps.Models
Engine Power Torque Years M133 DE20 LA 265 kW (360 PS; 355 hp)
at 6,000 rpm450 N⋅m (332 lb⋅ft)
at 2,250–5,000 rpm2013–2015 280 kW (381 PS; 375 hp)
at 6,000 rpm475 N⋅m (350 lb⋅ft)
at 2,250–5,000 rpm2015–2018
Perhaps they were destined to build a SUV 16 years ago.Colin Chapman is definitely turning in his grave…a Lotus SUV. I would have never thought of this ten years ago.
Colin Chapman is definitely turning in his grave…a Lotus SUV. I would have never thought of this ten years ago.
SUVs are where the market is, so it should help Lotus with sales. Still a sad day for Lotus enthusiasts.
Colin Chapman is definitely turning in his grave…a Lotus SUV. I would have never thought of this ten years ago.
SUVs are where the market is, so it should help Lotus with sales. Still a sad day for Lotus enthusiasts.
Speaking of which, the fact that Bugatti never put that sedan into production and don't have an SUV yet is really strange. I can't really figure out why that company still exists. Their development cycle is basically non-existent and they don't seem too interested in making buckets of money by selling the most gloriously fast luxury sedans and SUVs on the market.I know this is basically a near-production concept, but does this make McLaren and Bugatti the only manufacturers not to offer SUVs now?
I've always seen VW's purchase of the Bugatti name as a halo brand that would cast a positive light on the rest of the portfolio. Neither as a money maker or much of a loss maker, although i've never studied the figures to know whether that's true or not.Speaking of which, the fact that Bugatti never put that sedan into production and don't have an SUV yet is really strange. I can't really figure out why that company still exists. Their development cycle is basically non-existent and they don't seem too interested in making buckets of money by selling the most gloriously fast luxury sedans and SUVs on the market.
Wait until the Rimac-Bugatti IPO.Speaking of which, the fact that Bugatti never put that sedan into production and don't have an SUV yet is really strange. I can't really figure out why that company still exists. Their development cycle is basically non-existent and they don't seem too interested in making buckets of money by selling the most gloriously fast luxury sedans and SUVs on the market.
Doesn't seem like they see the need to. They already make buckets of money selling out their production line years in advance to an extremely loyal ownership base. They could pump money into a SUV/sedan, but their clientele seems really entrenched in the idea of the company being the most famous, exclusive auto brand in the world. There are $3m+ Chiron owners who will gladly spend another $3-5m on an additional Chiron or other exclusive model. See last year: there were 150 orders & 40% were previous owners.Speaking of which, the fact that Bugatti never put that sedan into production and don't have an SUV yet is really strange. I can't really figure out why that company still exists. Their development cycle is basically non-existent and they don't seem too interested in making buckets of money by selling the most gloriously fast luxury sedans and SUVs on the market.
SP3, Monza, Valkyrie, Essenza, Bolide, BT62, GT Mk.II, Senna GTR. There's a growing market for these cars that aren't any more responsible & imaginative than Bugatti's target line.@McLaren @TheCracker from a business standpoint I agree with both of you but not from a public opinion standpoint. You mention "making VAG look good" but to my eyes the essence of Bugatti has shifted rapidly the past couple years from "engineering marvel" to "irresponsible and unimaginative plaything" which doesn't seem like a good look in 2022.
They want cars other people bid for. To them, a Bugatti represents a highest level of supercar they can use an status symbol. Whether or not we agree with them doesn't matter to the manufacturer; what does matter is that they fill out their order books years in advance which clearly indicates there's a strong desire.What defines this exclusivity that wealthy buyers are looking for? Is it merely the fact that nobody else can get a thing, or is it that nobody else can get it and they want it? If nobody cares about or wants an exclusive thing then it doesn't really matter if one person has it, does it? Eventually the perception of exclusivity for that product will shift as it's no longer desirable by the masses, it's just expensive for the sake of being expensive.
I have a suspicion owners of Bugatti wealth aren't that bothered.Buying things like that doesn't make you cool, it turns people against you.
Except most people clamor over them. Look at car shows where a Bugatti might as well be the Charizard of supercars. People aren't hating Bugatti any time soon.From a business perspective it seems like a bad move to become a company that most people hate.
They're likely going to look towards Rimac to help build the next car. Porsche is also looking to work with Rimac. I don't think either side is that bothered.Combine that with a lack of innovation and irrelevancy and insolvency will surely follow. I mean, if Bugatti's next car is a hybrid then they'll be nearly 10 years behind their own investor Porsche lol.
Yeah, I think that's really going be your sole opinion. Bugattis remain impressive feats of engineering; no one has still quite matched what they built with the Veyron & improved upon with Chiron in terms of power, reliability, luxury, and usability in 1 package. That's been part of Bugatti's charm & remains so.I don't think Bugatti is in the business of being utterly unimpressive, yet that's the space they currently occupy. Hell, they'd probably garner more respect if they attempted to create and sell actual products like Lotus is doing here.