- 6,231
- Halifax, England
- christara321
Oh my gosh 
Just came across this.
Check out around 2 mins 30....
Just came across this.Check out around 2 mins 30....
Lunar roving vehicle????!!!!!
- Thread starter Aphelion
- 650 comments
- 48,875 views
- 2,121
- Chicago
- mustang622006
Well, at least the red bull looks like it belongs on the moon 
- 394
- Hampshire,UK
- skilledf1racer
Oh my gosh
This would probably be the only hack I would accept on GT6
other then slamming cars etc. 
- 5,619
- The US of A
Oh my gosh
Check out around 2 mins 30....
@2:45
Houstan we have lift off!
Well I guess that answers projectwat's question he asked on the last page.
Thanks for posting that christara321! 
👍The next thing I would like to know is if that person was doing the mission itself or if he managed to make the track available elsewhere. So many questions....
- 1,169
- Maine
- LETS4000
Oh my gosh
Check out around 2 mins 30....
Now they need to make a moon rally race somehow! I'd play that online if they made that a track lol
- 5,619
- The US of A
If people use this online a lot, they will have it patched in no time more than likely. Be best to keep it offline in my opinion.
JK83
Premium
- 3,384
- Finland
- Try JK83..
Trust me, peoples doesn't use that online.
- 5,619
- The US of A
Well what I am saying is "if" they did. Granted that they actually can make it available online somehow.
- 1,169
- Maine
- LETS4000
That's true
Downhill Dino
Premium
- 11,754
- Maryland
- DownhillDinosaur
JK83
Premium
- 3,384
- Finland
- Try JK83..
That car shoot much higher without 200kg ballast and full downforce.
Anyway nice work with great .gif 👍
- 99
- London, UK
- PM me.
- 404
- Edinburgh
- jazza96uk
Surely on the moon its downforce wouldn't matter?
In the video of the Ford and the Red Bull on the moon, they are both affected by the physical conditions, so the low-gravity is part of the moon.
Last edited by a moderator:
- 2,187
- Kansas City
- PsuPepperoni
- 4,455
- São Paulo / Bra
- diegorborges82
Ok, this is a cool hack.
They should let us drive in the moon. GO nuts.
They should let us drive in the moon. GO nuts.
Well, if the hammer was about the same dimensions as the feather, they would fall at the same rate here on earth too..
The air resistant is what makes the hammer fall first due to its "aerodynamic" shape, not the weight..
- 2,187
- Kansas City
- PsuPepperoni
Physics is a f%#%ed up thing
- 8,723
Strictly speaking, the acceleration felt by either object is determined by the difference of the force due to gravity (determined by its mass and, well, gravity) and the drag force (determined by its speed, shape and size).
The reason a steel feather would fall faster than a real one of equivalent shape (feathered steel indeed!) and size is because it weighs more, so its gravity force ("weight") dominates over the drag force up to a higher falling speed. At that point, the acceleration is zero and the speed would have stabilised. Assuming it had the time to get there.
Momentum is the product of mass and speed, so does not affect the falling rate in itself, rather, it is dependent on it.
However, any rotation imparted when it is dropped will have higher momentum, so the steel feather will not "align" itself to the falling direction as well as a real feather - that would affect its drag force, probably increasing its falling speed even more.
Weight does matter on the moon, since it still affects how fast things can accelerate on a given force; esp. e.g. climbing hills. I don't think you can get much downforce from non-continuum "fluid" interactions, though, certainly.
Similar threads
