CAMAROBOY69
Premium
- 18,567
- Michigan
- CAMAROBOY69
Just another proof of how horrible accidents like that are.
You are aware that the fallout spread far and wide, right? Look at Colorado alone, where radiation has been detected in drinking water. Alright, they do say you'd need to drink some 2000 gallons for any health impacts. But think of that effect on fish, specifically in their spawning. I'm sure a couple years from now we'll start seeing reports of 3-eyed trout, salmon with no fins, or even unusally low numbers of said species. What about the mother bear who feeds on those fish, then delivers cubs? Or the eagle that swoops down with talons open to feed her nestlings? Then there are seasonal snow melts which run into streams and saturate soil - radiated snow, mind you - and it becomes an almost endless cycle.This is not evidence of anything of the sort. I'm not worried about a few butterflies. They're still expecting bodies to be uncovered as water that was trapped inland (creating new lakes) dries up. They'll be finding their dead for years to come. I don't care about mutated butterflies or even a small "no-go" zone for radiation.
In Colorado? That's his point. Yes, radiation near the plant is dangerous. But to start talking about the dangers on the other side of the world, like mutant fish, is comparable to saying low level natural forms of radiation could do it. I mean, that 2,000 gallons of water you say would be required to cause damage is actually, according to the EPA, 7,000 liters of water drunk by an infant to equal one day's worth of natural background radiation. I don't see mutant fish occurring any time soon.HippieGiraffeLook at Chernobyl and TMI, sites which are still causing damaging effects all these years later.
A bit of good news, however - after just six years, they have managed to locate some of the nuclear fuel that has fallen out of one of the damaged reactors. As it says in the article, "Locating the fuel is the first step towards removing it.". I'm certainly no expert in the decommissioning of nuclear reactors after a triple meltdown, but even I knew that.
Apparently they were having a bit of trouble finding it because the radiation levels in there are quite high - too high even for the robots they planned to use to find it. The atmospheric radiation levels in one reactor was measured this week at 530 Sv/h - to put that in perspective, a dose of 1 Sv is enough to cause radiation sickness, and 5 Sv is enough to kill 50% of people within a month. The robots used by Tepco can withstand a total dose of 1,000 Sv - meaning that they would last less than 2 hours each in that reactor; so that's going to mean a lot of robots over the course of decommissioning of the plant, which is expected to take 40 years. Soon they are going to have to build robots just to clear away the robots.
Workers at Fukushima are supposed to be limited to just 20 mSv radiation per year, or a total dose of 100 mSv (though that was temporarily raised to 250 mSv). However, in the reactor described above, the radiation levels are currently running at 147 mSv per second - that's high enough to cause certain death after just 69 seconds exposure.
Soon they are going to have to build robots just to clear away the robots.
No.I've also read that the core itself could theoretically burn a hole through the earth's crust and sink deep enough to hit the core of the planet in around 12-15 years, leading to god-knows what...
"Unless something is done quickly, the trapped robots will be dead within 300 years. Sir, what rescue operations are planned?"
"The plan is basically to pave over the area and get on with our lives."