Good times today!
I think the Shuffle Surprise format could lead to many surprises
... very interesting racing with perhaps some strategic choices... but in a very limited way. Will be interesting to see how it varies with more racers than today's lowish turnout.
For example, with our usual 7-9 racers.
Having said that... The race at Streets of Willow in the Traffic cars... seemed to have VERY heavy traffic!!
It was hard to believe there were just 5 cars in that race, as it was very crowded the whole time. And also, that track seems to make slower cars seem a lot more wild.
At any rate, I've updated the Shuffle Surprise instructions in the OP to reflect some details that hadn't been specifically specified.
I guess I hadn't thought of everything, and also I suppose presumed some things to be assumed.
But now everything is noted, so we can all uniformly have expectations. 👍
Example: track should be chosen BEFORE the car list is decided/mentioned.
It benefits the person choosing the car list to hold their preference ... even if they'll choose this car list no matter what track gets chosen.
For instance... When I chose the Retro list... I probably would've chosen that car list no matter what track was chosen. However I held my response until the track was chosen. And maybe if someone chosen GT Arena A I would decide to choose Luxury list instead.
(Just kidding.)
If anyone's interested... I've had this shuffle surprise idea since GT5 perhaps as far back as 2012 or before.
I remember discussing it when there were "club forums" on GTPlanet. And I recall the specific conversation with
@IMZIZ (who I haven't seen on track in a dog's age)... and I remembered some key points of strategies that may develop, that he mentioned to be aware of in a scheme like this.
So that's why the rules have to be quite specific, and should be followed. To make sure things stay interesting.
👍
For example, in GT5 shuffle rooms... hosts would often try to come up with a scheme to pick PP-base & track or 1-make car, etc... And too often I would see a winner pick a PP-base first... then they'd put up the track vote... and
the combination would be something strange
And the winner from the previous race and 3 other people would rage quit.
So you have to be real careful with any scheme where multiple people are scheming to choose the combinations.
So that's why the very specific rules.
Example: 15 variable drivers in a Mini Cooper 1-make at Fuji, or 15 lambos & aston martins on Cote D'Azur never turned out so hot.
I think we need to test both on track at the same time.
That's an interesting idea.
I am now more than ever convinced that this "glitch" is not an error at all, but an "easter egg" ... either sanctioned, or sneaked in, I don't know. But I think it must be deliberate!
Seems almost unimaginable that this could be a simple error.
Of course I have been arguing about this with my spouse, who thinks I'm being awfully silly to think there is some pattern or puzzle to figure out.
But I just start wondering if there is some link between the 2 cars we've found that cause this:
BMW 507 '57
Aston Martin V12 Vantage '10
The one thing they definitely have in common is that they are both PREMIUM cars.
I had wondered if other premium cars would be potential candidates... Because the 507 was the ONLY premium car in the old (pre-revamp) vintage list.
That's why I scheduled to race the Performance Coupes list at Eiger Reverse -- because all the Perf Coupes are premium... thereby I thought increasing our chances of finding another box-triggering car.
And I was right! 💡
We found one.
Of course it was just that one. So NOT all premiums.
So... Is there anything else these cars have in common?
Think about it and humour me!