I mean, PD would have to include these next month, right?...
https://www.insidemazda.co.uk/2020/04/06/100-years-of-mazda-the-mazda-rx-7/
https://www.insidemazda.co.uk/2020/04/06/100-years-of-mazda-the-mazda-rx-7/
https://www.gran-turismo.com/world/gtsport/news/00_3024515.html
RX-Vision GT3 comes May 22, not 25?
https://www.gran-turismo.com/world/gtsport/news/00_3024515.html
RX-Vision GT3 comes May 22, not 25?
That's not PDLogic. You can't just take points from one manufacturer to another.I already knew this would be the caveat:
■ Notice and caution
Even if you already have a manufacturer contract (driver contract), you can re-contract with any manufacturer on stage 1. The manufacturer selected there will be unchangeable until the end of Stage 3.
In addition, with the addition of the MAZDA RX-VISION GT3 CONCEPT scheduled for Friday, May 22, we will be able to change the manufacturer's contract again. However, please note that if you transfer to another manufacturer at that time, the points you have earned up to that point will be void.
PDLogic™
No matter to me. I'm switching. Anyways, glad they decided to bring it a couple days forward.
That's not PDLogic. You can't just take points from one manufacturer to another.
The whole thing about switching. Just wait til Stage 2. It's PDLogic™ that players will accumulate all those points and wipe them at the start of the very last race in Stage 1.That's not PDLogic. You can't just take points from one manufacturer to another.
Any thoughts about the new update?? I am excited with Porsche 917 Concept more than Mazda RX Concept. I prefer to have one two cars from Group C era (Toyota) and a nice new (or old and good) track.
Even after the ‘sparse’ year statement by Kaz. I would hope we’re due a significant update focused on content and single-player this Spring/Summer. I’d have no problem with one further, major, update then calling it a day on GTS.Keep expectations low. We might get 3 cars as with the last update, the Mazda RX concept and ?2 others. With the 100 anniversary of Mazda just passed, that might include a second Mazda and something else as a filler.
Also, the Lambo VGT was supposed to arrive "spring 2020". If it's not been delayed for some reason, it'll have to appear in this update.
I think there will be one more track this year, but probably we won't see that until any potential FIA event later in 2020. Although I think the chances of any event now happening "in person" are somewhere between nil and zero this calendar year, personally.
For what it's worth, Mazda's VGT, is the LM55. The RX-VISION, is solely a GT3 car built by Mazda, to entice players to use Mazda in FIA and of course, for marketing reasons.Man I'd love to see that Time Attack Civic come along with next update. The Mazda is really cool but I don't really care about any of the future DLC VGT Cars now even though I do like them. I'd be happy even if that Time Attack Civic was next and last DLC car we get for GT Sport.
Any thoughts about the new update?? I am excited with Porsche 917 Concept more than Mazda RX Concept. I prefer to have one two cars from Group C era (Toyota) and a nice new (or old and good) track.
As an unpopular opinion, I strongly believe PD should focus on bringing back the majority of the GT6 premiums first. Sure they can update or drop older duplicates and add a SEMA winner or a modern race/sports car to keep fans happy but lots of fan favorites from GT5 and GT6 deserve to be in the game by now.
Even after the ‘sparse’ year statement by Kaz. I would hope we’re due a significant update focused on content and single-player this Spring/Summer. I’d have no problem with one further, major, update then calling it a day on GTS.
The last update focused primarily on multiplayer improvements. With the huge bump in player numbers a single-player focused update would be much appreciated.
As much as I think that'd be neat, I'd personally prefer having the normal, road-going RX-Vision be available. In fact, there are a few race cars in GTS where we don't have the road car, like the 2nd-gen Audi R8, the BMW M6, the Z4 (E89), and I may be forgetting some others.*rubs everything* Come on, Mazda/PD. Surprise us with a Gr.4 RX-VISION as well.
Beetle & Scirocco, DB9.As much as I think that'd be neat, I'd personally prefer having the normal, road-going RX-Vision be available. In fact, there are a few race cars in GTS where we don't have the road car, like the 2nd-gen Audi R8, the BMW M6, the Z4 (E89), and I may be forgetting some others.
As much as I think that'd be neat, I'd personally prefer having the normal, road-going RX-Vision be available. In fact, there are a few race cars in GTS where we don't have the road car, like the 2nd-gen Audi R8, the BMW M6, the Z4 (E89), and I may be forgetting some others.
And the Porsche Cayman.
Though, I really want a RX-Vision GT4. The Atenza in Gr. 4 is abysmal. Gets walloped by even FWD cars.
Maybe it just needs a BoP buff?
About the Atenza GR.4, it has 404bhp/1380kg(BOP). The programming just ain't right. It should be, proportionally, as good as it's Gr.3 variant.A BoP buff would just make it an inferior GT-R clone. Right now it lacks in acceleration, which is easily fixed by BoP, but the main problem it has is chronic tyre wear, which is almost comparable in severity to that of the GT-R, while having nothing to show for it. It handles like a dream, I'll give you that. But even in races without tyre wear, like this week's Race B at Red Bull Ring for example, where even the understeering mess that is the Memesubishi 5 Speed Evo has top 10 time spots in Asia, the Atenza is not even in the conversation.
Besides, if Mazda cars start getting buffs in BoP right after becoming partnered with Gran Turismo, it'd reek of favourtism, and I personally wouldn't want that as a Mazda fan. In the past few BoP changes, the Atenza Gr. 4 has been completely untouched, leading me to believe that PD thinks the Atenza is perfectly balanced
Even with the adjusted tyre wear rates for FFs and AWD, the Gr. 4 Atenza is god awful. I think what it needs more than anything is an adjustible centre diff. The Gr. 3 Atenza is in my mind the best all rounder FR car in Gr. 3 alongside the AMG GT3, and I wholly believe that the sole reason why Mazda hasn't ever made a World Tour event by merit is because the Gr. 4 car is so hopeless. As hyped as I am for the RX-Vision to appear again after 5 years, Mazda right now doesn't need another Gr. 3 car - the Atenza Gr. 3 is perfectly fine. What Mazda needs right now is a firm kick in the balls in Gr. 4.
Or we can skip over all that and "just" get a RX-Vision GT4. Even the Amemiya FD on racing tyres would run circles around the freaking Atenza.
Mazda right now doesn't need another Gr. 3 car - the Atenza Gr. 3 is perfectly fine. What Mazda needs right now is a firm kick in the balls in Gr. 4
It's almost pointless running the Gr.4 Mazda at any race with tyre wear. We've got people talking about the RBR race no-stopping and one-stopping on softs, and the Atenza can barely one-stop on mediums. The Gr.3 car is great and can hang with most things on most tracks, but the Gr.4 is a slow-ass, tyre-chewing dog - good on brakes and, with fresh tyres, good through-corner speeds, but turgid in a straight line and insta-dead tyres.
I need a Gr.4 ND MX-5, or the Roadster TC from GT6, or an RX-8, or literally anything else.