- 40,808
It seems like that this car is a competitor for the upcoming 1 series sedan.
Hey. I actually like the look of that. It probably still looks hideous from the front, but it looks surprisingly nice from that angle.
It seems like that this car is a competitor for the upcoming 1 series sedan.
Though make mine the shooting brake, if they go through with it. High quality, sporty, not-too-big, stylish estate car. Throw in the 220 CDI engine and the 7-speed DCT and job's a good'un.
@Tornado:
Im not a fan of the current 1 series, but I also like that picture of the sedan. I don`t know whether it is official or not, its from a german car magazine. I just hope they change the front!
The CLA-Class takes the rakish sedan formula first seen on the Mercedes-Benz CLS to a smaller scale, riding on the architecture that underpins the svelte new A-Class hatchback in other markets. It's a pretty car, especially with the optional sport goodies seen on the silver car in our image gallery, and its design is actually quite efficient. Mercedes has managed to achieve a super-slippery drag coefficient of just 0.23. (For comparison, a Toyota Prius has a drag number of 0.25.)
Only the CLA250 model will be offered in the United States (until the hotter CLA45 AMG arrives, anyway), available with either front- or all-wheel drive – Mercedes-Benz is employing an updated version of its 4Matic system here that features fully variable torque distribution. Powering the CLA250 is a turbocharged 2.0-liter inline four-cylinder good for 208 horsepower and 258 pound-feet of torque, mated solely to a seven-speed dual-clutch transmission. The standard CLA250 rides on 17-inch alloy wheels, while models with the available sport package roll on five-spoke, 18-inch wheels.
Its a FWD based on the A Class. It only features 4 cylinders right now, which are mounted transverse IIRC. I highly doubt that the bigger V6 engines will fit right now, maybe they will introduce them with the next facelift or its successor. Mercedes has now 2 different cars for the same market, I hope this one steals some sales from the Passat/Mondeo/Avensis/Mazda 6.
This car will never get a V8. Nobody with enough money will take a CLA 63 AMG (which would have to be AWD) above the C63 AMG, which is a RWD (4 matic Version also coming) and features a much nicer interior, is safer etc.
I hope the next CLA will be based on the C Class, not A Class. I know alot of people who consider to buy one (most of them are 3 series fans/drivers), but don't want a FWD.
In the United States, it's going to sit in a very awkward market position. While on the one hand it'll cost give/take about the same as the C-Class, my understanding is that it'll be a little bit smaller and a little less capable of carrying things. We won't be getting the hatchback A-Class, unfortunately. So, on price alone, it's batting above it's class, but it's main competitor would still be the 1-series and 2-series from BMW, which which we (thus far) know nothing of for our market.
The engine options, are supposed to be all turbo four-cylinders. Even the AMG model, which will get the drivetrain from the A45 AMG.
I wouldn't cross-shop this with too much here. The American Passat is quite a bit larger than this, and top-trim levels go for an entirely different level of performance. Same with our Fusion/Mondeo, where the top trim is a 2.0L EcoBoost model. The Mazda 6 could compete on driving fun, but, the price differentials will be pretty high.
^ That. If people are honestly put off by it being FWD, they're probably idiots. Unless you like to pretend you're a drifter or regularly take your car on a circuit, RWD in something like this is pretty much irrelevant other than for e-penis points.
RWD is important.
You won't get the +250hp engines with FWD . Thats the reason why the AMG version comes with 4 matic. AWD means alot more fuel consumption and higher running costs. Mercedes RWDs offer a good level of comfort, neither its bigger platforms (C/E/S class), nor the A class platform is designed primary as AWD. I have driven enough 4 matic C/E classes to assure you that the RWD cars are much nicer to drive.
Also, I live in bavaria, so many people drive BMW here. "Freude am fahren" seems to be very important. Like I said, I was talking about 3 series drivers
And like the C-Class, most 3-Series (Clark's old-skool 325i, and others of that vintage aside!) don't really drive much like a "typical" RWD car anyway. Particularly on the fat tyres most stuff comes with. You need to be really travelling at some rate on a twisty road before you can start to appreciate the balance of the car.
That's as may be, but have you driven the new A-Class? I have - I've also driven the current 1-Series (specifically, the M135i). The 1-Series is marginally nicer to drive by dint of it simply having a nicer, more supple chassis, but by and large you'd not know which wheels were driven on either if you didn't already know.
A front-drive new A-Class feels little different from a rear-drive C-Class to drive, and unless you're driving a particularly powerful C-Class and being a berk with the throttle, it'll mostly understeer anyway. In fact, probably more than the A-Class, because it's RWD and set up a little softer and a little safer so people don't continually spin off the road like they used to in the olden days.
Incidentally, I doubt the A-Class/CLA will be particularly fuel-inefficient anyway. Both of them are two of the most aerodynamic cars on sale, and in regular driving I can't see the AMG being particularly worse than an A250 or A200. It's the same engine, after all, just in a different state of tune. Merc's 7-speed DCT is fairly efficient too.
With "nicer" I didn`t mean faster/easier to drive/sportier. I meant its more comfortable.
Yes, AWD has many advantages, but also some downsides. I guess families prefer AWD`s over FWD/RWDs. I don`t need a AWD, it would just mean a higher fuel consumption. I have driven the A Class too, but only for 2 hours. For a FF it really feels good IMO, but I still prefer the the C-Class.