I recommended bringing back the turbo with AWD, but only for the top of the line models. 90% of the Eclipse models should be the cheap, FWD models with no turbo. I don't believe in selling bunch of V-6 models, because of fuel prices, and I also believe that decline of Eclipse begun with overweight, V-6 models. As for the top of the line Eclipse taking sales away from the Lancer Evos, you have a point there. I still think that MMC can price the Eclipse AWD 2, 3 grand cheaper, but I could be wrong.IMADreamerI think some of you guys have it very wrong. Just because you and some other import enthusiast loved the AWD turbo eclipse doesn't mean it should make a comeback. Those cars didn't sell for crap here. Neither did the FWD turbo eclipse. The big sellers by far were the RS and GS and convertibles.
a6m5I recommended bringing back the turbo with AWD, but only for the top of the line models. 90% of the Eclipse models should be the cheap, FWD models with no turbo. I don't believe in selling bunch of V-6 models, because of fuel prices, and I also believe that decline of Eclipse begun with overweight, V-6 models. As for the top of the line Eclipse taking sales away from the Lancer Evos, you have a point there. I still think that MMC can price the Eclipse AWD 2, 3 grand cheaper, but I could be wrong.
That's actually a really good idea!👍IMADreamerI really think if they are going to do AWD and Turbo they are going to have to aim much lower then the Evo. Maybe 5-6k lower. Then push the base price of the base models down so they aren't close to the AWD Turbo model.
Another option I thought about on the drive home from work today was to really go outside of Mitsus box and make the eclipse RWD and turbo or just RWD with a NA V6. Trim some weight off it and then aim it squarely at the 350z. That could revive not only the eclipse name but Mitsu in the states. The Z did wonders for Nissan because of the buzz it created. If I were a Mitsu big wig I would seriously think about a RWD version. Then you are now offering two sporty performance orientated cars to the public. The Evo which will compete for those subaru lovers and the eclipse which will go after the Z. If you have two cars like that out there it's going to generate a lot of hype and get people talking. At hat point it would just come down to freshining up models like the Lancer to maybe compete with the Mazda 6 base models which sell like hotcakes.
I forgot about this in the post this morning, but a lot of buyers like the Eclipse, simply for the look of the coupe also. Evo being a sedan, another reason that they might be able to coexist.IMADreamerI really think if they are going to do AWD and Turbo they are going to have to aim much lower then the Evo. Maybe 5-6k lower. Then push the base price of the base models down so they aren't close to the AWD Turbo model.
Good point. I thought about this too. Reason I wouldn't go that route is because Eclipse has always been an affordable, FWD coupe. Plus, with RWD, it will increase the prodution cost of the Eclipse, where if I were MMC, I'd want to keep the car cheap. I do think RWD coupe is a good idea though. I'd rather do 240SX sized one with a 4 banger, but 350Z competitor like a 3000GT/GTO wouldn't be a bad idea. 👍IMADreamerAnother option I thought about on the drive home from work today was to really go outside of Mitsus box and make the eclipse RWD and turbo or just RWD with a NA V6.
Gotta agree with most of this.a6m5I think I agree with the YSSMAN's first post in its' entirety. Days of badass 3000GTs, Eclipse and Montero(maybe even Diamante) are gone. If I had a say in Mitsubishi Motors(MMC North America) restructuring, I would make these changes:
Raider(fullsize truck) - Gone. MMC aren't able to compete in the pickup market, and they aren't fooling anyone. Borrowing designs for trucks like Raider is just making MMC look bad.
Montero - Import on limited basis. Near-special order.
Endeavor - No change.
Outlander - No change.
Lancer Evolution - No change.
Eclipse - Make it smaller and lighter. Lose the convertible and V-6. Bring back Turbo(maybe AWD) for the top of the line models.
Galant - Aim for Ford Fusion, Mazda 6, not Camry or Accord. Something little bit smaller, but cheaper in the Midsize segment.
Lancer - No change.
There are few other changes that must be made in order for MMC to survive in the U.S.:
1) Bring down the MSRP. At this point, they have to bring in the customers to the showroom first. Consumers know that MMC cars are not Toyotas & Hondas, so stop pricing them comparably. They will shop MMC, only if the pricing make sense.
2) Add couple of mini-fuel saver cars to the line up. I'd do GEO Metro/Subaru Justy-type small car, plus Scion type(not tC) wagon.
3) Retrain the Dealers. I don't know about rest of the U.S., but in my neighborhood, MMC Dealers are losers. They have "L" attitude, and all the good MMC dealers wisely dumped MMC from their chains few years ago. Reward good customer service. If your dealers don't change, it will be tough moving your cars even if your products improve.
OnikazeYou want to sell cars to young guys with large amounts of disposable income?
Make a light RWD car that they can "trick out".
The tuner crowd doesn't have any love for the new Eclipse, they didn't have any love for the 3G either, it's such a chick car now.
Why spend the money on an Eclipse when you can get a much nicer looking Civic coupe, have a lighter car, and the aftermarket loves it.
They need to do something with a light coupe, naturally I, and many others would like to see it RWD, but even if it was FWD, as long as it was little, cheap, and light, it would create the buzz they need.
Leftlanenews.comDespite recent rumors that it is considering leaving the United States, Mitsubishi insists it’s here to stay. Hiroshi Harunari, CEO of Mitsubishi Motors North America Inc., said the company has been selling vehicles in the United States for the last 25 years, and will continue to do so into the foreseeable future. “The next 25 years begins today with the full support of the Mitsubishi group companies,” he said in an interview with Automotive News. Recently, Mitsubishi product strategist Shinichi Kurihara said the automaker’s new vehicles have to “be successful for us to stay in business in the U.S.”