CodeRedR51
Premium
- 55,274
- United States
Sarcasm noted. And you know what you can do with it.Once again your insider Nissan knowledge has proven invaluable to the community.
Sarcasm noted. And you know what you can do with it.Once again your insider Nissan knowledge has proven invaluable to the community.
The brand is not only about the Lancer Evolution anyway.
Lol wtf, what are you talking about?In Mitsubishi's most important market of North America? Yes, it more or less is, considering it was the brand's calling card for years beginning with the Evo VII. Subaru at least had reliability and AWD to hawk and believe in. Mitsubishi has more or less since 2004 hitched their wagon to the idea that buying a Lancer even would get you somewhat close to the idea of piloting a Evo in a rally stage or whatever. Not anymore.
If they're going to try the tactic of race on Sunday, sell on Monday, they basically have no options for a hypothetical Evo XI that aren't obscure rally disciplines that aren't under the hold of R5 regulations. Contrast that with Honda and Acura, at least in North America, who actually do have options to intersect into advertising racing heritage with the current model range (James Hinchcliffe, obviously, but also the HART Civic Type R TCR and then Katherine Legge and the Meyers Shank Acura NSX GT3) Granted, it's on more or less halo models, but what can Mistubishi do? I don't think many people in North America care about Dakar, and if they did know about it, they'd know that the Outlander or RVR they can buy at their local dealership is nothing like the purpose built off road racers that are present in Dakar.
Exactly my point. I don't know why Mitsubishi has completely abandoned the thought of any somewhat exciting car.That's the sort of thing that could help them. Not some random CUV with a re-hashed nameplate.
I don't know, honestly. Strangely, despite the Outlander Sport being a decade old almost, it's 2018 sales (39,000) was the highest ever. Since 2015, its sales have been increasing, so I guess there's no urgency for it to die. Mind you, it only sold 16,000 units in 2011 and 18,000 in 2012.Which might lead to a reason good enough to pull out in the US market. Three diamonds no more.
Those numbers only show how small time they really are in that market.I don't know, honestly. Strangely, despite the Outlander Sport being a decade old almost, it's 2018 sales (39,000) was the highest ever. Since 2015, its sales have been increasing, so I guess there's no urgency for it to die. Mind you, it only sold 16,000 units in 2011 and 18,000 in 2012.
The Mirage is improving as well. It sold the highest amount of units in 2018, with its sales also steadily increasing since it came out in 2015.
Really?Releasing a performance saloon with a second-tier model name, generally beloved by JDM fans in a market dominated by crossovers sounds like the absolute worst thing they could do.
I won't be liking this idea if that Galant is only going to be based on the platform of Nissan's midsize sedans.Really?
I think it would be a great idea, but only if done right. The Galant name has always been used for Mitusbishi's midsize sedan, so a new midsize sedan called Galant would make perfect sense. Personally, a Galant VR-4 should compete with the VW Arteon based on that sketch, but it could have the upper hand by being cheaper, better looking, and have a mild-hybrid powertrain.
Lifted hatchbacks? You mean CUVs?Sedans dont sell, people who buy cars now have no taste for anything other then lifted hatchbacks.
Well that’s what CUVs basically are, yes.Lifted hatchbacks? You mean CUVs?
Mitsubishi has to start somewhere, though. Also, a mid-size 4WD saloon with a coupe-like roofline isn't exactly comparable with a Chevy SS.Yeah, that Galant would be a flop here. It would do worse than the Chevy SS. It's a bad combo: a vehicle type that doesn't sell well from a manufacturer that doesn't sell well.
I almost thought that thing was just based on a Daewoo platform.It would do worse than the Chevy SS.
It's a rebadged Holden Commodore.I almost thought that thing was just based on a Daewoo platform.
What they have to do is build a more competent CUV, that's what is going to bring in the sales. As much as I HATE it, that seems to be the best path to go with.Mitsubishi has to start somewhere, though. Also, a mid-size 4WD saloon with a coupe-like roofline isn't exactly comparable with a Chevy SS.
Mitsubishi has to start somewhere, though. Also, a mid-size 4WD saloon with a coupe-like roofline isn't exactly comparable with a Chevy SS.
Hell, I don't think Mitsubishi even has any incentive to make another good CUV. The age-old Outlander Sport's sales are continuing to go up, while the Eclipse Cross, the brand's first new crossover in a while, has been a complete flop.A good CUV would be a good start.
I never said they were comparable. But they both have a driver side and passenger side mirror, so they're similar.
Personally, a Galant VR-4 should compete with the VW Arteon based on that sketch, but it could have the upper hand by being cheaper, better looking, and have a mild-hybrid powertrain.