Why do they refer to it as push & pull? Surely they can only be shifted towards you meaning pull only?
Or can we shift by pushing the paddles away? I doubt an F1 car has ever had a gearbox like that, that´s more WRC Rally stuff.
David Coulthard mentioned he used this type of system so he could shift down with his right hand if he really had to (extraordinary circumstances). They were dicussing it last year when some of the drivers were using their hand for the f-duct and driving one-handed.
David Coulthard mentioned he used this type of system so he could shift down with his right hand if he really had to (extraordinary circumstances). They were dicussing it last year when some of the drivers were using their hand for the f-duct and driving one-handed.
Ok but you really don´t want to use the F-duct while downshifting.
It´s made to stall the wing and during braking/downshifting you want as much downforce as possible.
Must be some other cause as to why they use it.
They also use a level for brake bias (certain teams)
In addition, when a Formula 1 car pulls out of the pits, the driver has to turn the steering wheel to an extreme lock to avoid his pit crew, at the same time as changing up quickly through the gears as he accelerates away. Pulling a paddle with your arms at full lock is not an easy or natural action. So "Pull / Push system" is used to allow the driver to push as well as pull, to select a gear. It gives the driver total control, allowing them to change gear quickly, easily and accurately even when tackling a hairpin at high speed.
In reality rather than being mounted to the steering column, it’s part of the steering wheel. "Pull / Push system" avoids the problem of traditional paddles being out of reach if you’re at full lock, and keeps the driver connected to the gears at all times, whichever way they’re turning.
The paddle is in the same place at all times (on the wheel) so pulling something towards you will always be more beneficial then pushing something away from you.
Sorry don´t buy the arguments, there must be some other cause for this.
papaspursInertia says otherwise?
.
The paddle is in the same place at all times (on the wheel) so pulling something towards you will always be more beneficial then pushing something away from you.
David Coulthard explained during this year's Montreal grand prix commentary that the paddles are on a "rocker" attached to the steering wheel, meaning either paddle can be used for both upshift and downshift. This is important because they often have one hand on the wheel when making adjustments to their set up.
Inertia says otherwise?
I know in some cases it was driver preference.
To get back to the wheel itself, even with the push pull system, I don't recall seeing two functions detailed for the shifters so there's then another question about wether forward or back would do the same thing or the opposite.
Unless you only have one hand on the wheel.
According to this page on yahoo answers, it seems that DC mentioned the rocker paddles again this year, must have missed it, but here's the quote on the page:
"This is important because they often have one hand on the wheel when making adjustments to their set up."
Quick example here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WzqMsm4Ba1E
Read comments to understand perfectly this system.
Inertia really only counts for the head of the driver as the body is strapped in very hard.
Huh? Explain please
It just doesn´t make any sense from a driving point of view for me atleast.
I can´t think of a single scenario where it would be beneficial to push a lever instead of pulling it.
papaspursI was responding specifically to the comment that puling was always more beneficial. Under braking everything in the car, strapped in or not wants to move forwards, so some might prefer moving forwards to change down.
It was just a throw away comment really and before the flame war starts... I don't want to take the thread further off track.... I know you could say we're only talking about fingers and I could say it's still physics no matter how insignificant.
So we're definitely all correct
My take is that it's a last resort, not something the drivers would actually use over pulling the downshift by choice. Imagine you're on a straight, adjusting a setting and an incident happens in front unexpectedly, at least you can keep your revs up without fumbling around. Or I think an extreme example could be at a start, where you still have the bite-point clutch paddle accuratley positioned and you suddely have to react and downshift without getting bogged-down too much. Try quickly downshifting with your index and middle finger, without moving the clutch paddle which is finely positioned with your ring and pinky. Not easy.
Also, you're mentioning inertia and braking Gs, but what about shifting up during a straight with the left hand, whist adjusting something with the right hand?
Either way, I guess it's better to have the feature and not need it, than to need it and not have it.
Logitech have a .press event in Holland today.... Could be a new wheel
That would be welcome news. Maybe that is why G27 price is dropping, well in the UK it is a bit lower than before? More competition in the high end the better.
Seems like the wrong thread to talk about Logitech