- 6,077
- USA
- swara96
kingkingSorry to say this, not referring to shell , but hacks cars still here.
ryznoTrue but they are not part cars, they are done by hex editing.(they still havent figured that out)
They should have locked saved files and unlock the parts.
kingkingSorry to say this, not referring to shell , but hacks cars still here.
nice!
Edit: Looking at all the times and I must say, Good job guys.
Yeah and on the Aventador recent results photo, the 2nd result has too much G's. 1.69 on the Aventador isn't possible. And he said he spent hours tuning it, yet there are only 3 runs in the recent results... Idk.
And after a really long time...
![]()
kingkingI like your photo, nice time mate.
SpikeyLEENice one janco and king king..tried to get there last night thinking it would only takr a few mins lol but I'm still at 8.889 that .002 can take some time but I'm somewhat determined
Shells I'm a little iffy on that aventador time
SpikeyLEENice one janco and king king..tried to get there last night thinking it would only takr a few mins lol but I'm still at 8.889 that .002 can take some time but I'm somewhat determined
Can someone send me a 2nd LMQ ? I only have one but i would like a 2nd one to retune.
wraith of horusCan someone send me a 2nd LMQ ? I only have one but i would like a 2nd one to retune.
Yeah and on the Aventador recent results photo, the 2nd result has too much G's. 1.69 on the Aventador isn't possible. And he said he spent hours tuning it, yet there are only 3 runs in the recent results... Idk.
And after a really long time...
![]()
RonbowWhats a good time for the civic type r (ep,eu) 01 this isnt the 04 version to be clear
Shells N CheeseI clear the results, don't like it getting cluttered with hundreds of runs. There really isn't that much more pull, the 0-100 is a bit faster yes, I flipped it for a lower speed and moved 7th to the left a bit more to get the proper top speed. I then proceeded to edit 6th, 5th, 4th, and 3rd, I didn't expect it to be easy to believe, I get that it seems far fetched but I can assure you it's legit, I ran the car really early in the morning and couldn't find my camera so I messaged someone the stats and went on Skype to show a few people my settings sheet, that is when I found my camera and took a pic of my 8.889 run but then I ran a few more times and got 8.889 followed by two 8.886's and then I quit because I got really tired and wanted to go to bed. I ran it after I installed the update by the way. Nice time on that LMQ of yours by the way![]()
Note that "idk" at the end... Looks like you know something we don't. But whatever I tried to do with the lambo didn't work out for me as far as a stretched tranny goes, then Pro_Tunes enlightened me. 7th geat stretched out by more than 2-3 clicks just loses the pull and that is why I don't get about your Aventador. I'll try to retune mine as I think I might have gotten onto something... Thanks
@midnight mate, I had a 8.898 on the 2.04 with a wing and I am pretty sure I had same G's (1.68). Not 100% tho.
I've read up on some old threads and from what I read the retro launch didn't work on Indy that's why karo was never that fast when it came to online racing, I'll have to hunt this thread down again, might take some time to find it but hopefully it's still around somewhere, I've also heard this stated in person by multiple people, don't remember there PSN ID's but I remember hearing this. I highly doubt that anyone besides the 3 or 4 people wanting it at this time want to go back and re-tune every single car that they own for a retro launch, I'm just curious as to why anyone wants to do it. Also, every time I've actually came across a timed launcher online everyone complains about it (not me, I don't even really notice and just assume I'm getting treed, until it happens like 20 times in a row with the same car). Even if retro launching does work online it's really not going to prove anything, I also always here people complaining about the leaderboard being all timed launch times, I have a few names in mind that have said that but I wont state them here. I think what we need is a good old black screen launch leaderboard so people wont have to argue about it anymore, we can also have a separate leaderboard for retro launching and all that other stuff as well. Just look at the issues it's starting to cause already and we're only talking about it. This is just my opinion and thoughts on this situation, I say if you go ahead and allow retro launching then we should have separate leaderboards, just like the hacking leaderboard that is separate from this one. I don't see an issue with that, this way you can do it your way and everyone else can do it their way. I think this is fair, what do you guys think?
Yeah there was... I'll try, thanks.There was an IDK at the end? I didn't notice that at all. I hope you find that perfect flip, best of luck to you Janco.
Lol, thats my pic!![]()
OOH RLLY jancolooking back a few pages and noticed you sneak this on i almost not notice it was there .001 off my time. B**** uuuuuu
![]()
Yeah there was... I'll try, thanks.
Lol, thats my pic!
Yeah there was... I'll try, thanks.
Lol, thats my pic!
Can you borrow glitch on your computer?
Danny280zxturboMy bad Mistereads! Is the black ED? Ill posted right now!
I can't see the picture from here but Ill see it tomorrow!👍
Ill send you the CAMARO RM on Wednesday morning because I owe c-losk a STI RM and If I don't send it he will be mad!
But thanks for reminding me! Ill send it on Wednesday, do you know how use the borrow glitch?