- 567
- aGrenadeShark
- aGrenadeShark
I know the thread title is a bit ambiguous. Let me explain my testing and hopefully someone will shed some light. I did 3 tests.
I have a test track I made. All starts were done exactly the same way. Gear shifts were done at 6k. The horsepower curve got better and better as I did the engine mods.
The test track has a downhill then an uphill run. The pp was equivalent for all these runs.
stage 1 392/492 @4400 6100rpm redline tq3600 rpm 23.872
stage 2 384/535 @3900 6200rpm redline tq3700 rpm 23.876
stage 3 380/557 @3700 6300rpm redline tq3500 rpm 23.861
I would think with these types of horsepower/tq differences, there would be more obvious of a difference. But there isn't. What gives?
Edit: I tried this on two more sets of cars and they had noticeable performance gains from engine upgrades at the same PP levels. It seems my test car was just a boat.
I have a test track I made. All starts were done exactly the same way. Gear shifts were done at 6k. The horsepower curve got better and better as I did the engine mods.
The test track has a downhill then an uphill run. The pp was equivalent for all these runs.
stage 1 392/492 @4400 6100rpm redline tq3600 rpm 23.872
stage 2 384/535 @3900 6200rpm redline tq3700 rpm 23.876
stage 3 380/557 @3700 6300rpm redline tq3500 rpm 23.861
I would think with these types of horsepower/tq differences, there would be more obvious of a difference. But there isn't. What gives?
Edit: I tried this on two more sets of cars and they had noticeable performance gains from engine upgrades at the same PP levels. It seems my test car was just a boat.
Last edited: