SuperCobraJet
(Banned)
- 2,472
- Virginia USA
- SuperCobraJet1
I think most people know that. It's a question of being indifferent over the use of using that brand to represent the system or not.
Here here! Bring on the NOS.
I think most people know that. It's a question of being indifferent over the use of using that brand to represent the system or not.
That link gave this awesome:As long as you don't pour it in the tank thinking it's an octane booster, you should be fine.
NOS fuel additive is 95% kerosene. You just poured nearly a quart of kerosene into your tank.
Although you may want to check your owner's manual, I'm pretty sure your bike was not designed to run on - what is effectively - diesel fuel.
Like I said, who cares? If people want to "understandably" get annoyed by the use of a related brand, that's their issue.Not really, quite the opposite. In my opinion, it is more about people who, understandably, get a bit annoyed by the use of a brand name which is substituted for the actual product. A substitution that came about as the result of product placement in a cheesy movie, at that. After said movie came out, many of the younger crowd found it "cool" to use the term and felt that it showed that they had "superior knowledge." In fact, what had happened was that these people had swallowed the cheesy product placement and the endless repetition of the "word" hook, line, and sinker.![]()
As long NOS can break your engine after excessive use, I am in for it.
The nitrous in GT4 was about a 50-shot
mafia_boyit was a very limited system in that only the smaller engined cars (4cyl & rotaries) got the full 100hp, whereas the sixes got 70hp and the V8's/V12's only got 50hp.
Who cares when clearly EVERYBODY knows what is being referred to? It's the insecure pedantics out to try and prove their superior knowledge that ruin threads like this.
Not really, quite the opposite. In my opinion, it is more about people who, understandably, get a bit annoyed by the use of a brand name which is substituted for the actual product. A substitution that came about as the result of product placement in a cheesy movie, at that. After said movie came out, many of the younger crowd found it "cool" to use the term and felt that it showed that they had "superior knowledge." In fact, what had happened was that these people had swallowed the cheesy product placement and the endless repetition of the "word" hook, line, and sinker.![]()
Or how any car from imported from Japan for sale in other countries is JDM. Even the ones that were considerably modified when they were sold elsewhere.It also irritates the hell out of me when people ask me about JASMA mufflers. It's not a brand. It's not even a guarantee of high performance. It just means the stupid thing meets the emissions standards set by the Japanese government.
Nitrous Oxide won't destroy your engine any more than bolting on a pair of turbos or a supercharger would its all about the proper tune...
It is when you can use it and the others can't, that's what the others are getting at.anyways...i say why not allow it? its not "cheating" anymore than any other power adders like turbos or superchargers are....
True, but the AI is so incompetent most of the time that the simple act of being a human player is practically cheating.It is when you can use it and the others can't, that's what the others are getting at.![]()
True, but the AI is so incompetent most of the time that the simple act of being a human player is practically cheating.
Wow I cannot believe these forums are running with no knowledge about cars whatsoever except a stupid Fast & Furious movies.
Metfanant, I really hope you are kidding with this statement
"Nitrous Oxide won't destroy your engine any more than bolting on a pair of turbos or a supercharger would its all about the proper tune..."
Nitrous oxide will definitely destroy an engine quickly. You have to have a stronger pistons, change the timing, have a bigger camshafts, reflash the ECU, etc. You don't just bolt a pair of N20 on a car and thing it will magically fly ESPECIALLY on any forced induction.
Wow I cannot believe these forums are running with no knowledge about cars whatsoever except a stupid Fast & Furious movies.
Wow I cannot believe these forums are running with no knowledge about cars whatsoever except a stupid Fast & Furious movies.
Metfanant, I really hope you are kidding with this statement
"Nitrous Oxide won't destroy your engine any more than bolting on a pair of turbos or a supercharger would its all about the proper tune..."
Nitrous oxide will definitely destroy an engine quickly. You have to have a stronger pistons, change the timing, have a bigger camshafts, reflash the ECU, etc. You don't just bolt a pair of N20 on a car and thing it will magically fly ESPECIALLY on any forced induction.
oh come on man...no need to go there about someone's name lol. One could say the same thing about naming yourself after character on a TV show that is more about entertainment then the cars....As far as your name goes, "TokyoDrift", it really shows how much you know cars just by watching that stupid movie that absolutely has no facts whatsoever about cars.
are you trying to flex your car knowledge muscles or something? nobody is arguing this point at all...As per general knowledge, holding nitrous oxide for a long period of time even if you got the lowest shot will blow any engine that is not equipped for racing (i.e. forged pistons).
Anyone who actually works on cars must be laughing at this thread.
On topic, I have no problem with any kind of HP increasing bolt-on kit being included for use with Gran Turismo 5 as long as the damage system accounts for engines that aren't up to snuff for the HP bolt-on.
If the only upgrades to your Civic SiR are a twin turbo kit and nitrous boost, well, you might make it through a few laps... and then your pit crew can explain to you why there's a melted piston and a cracked block under the hood, yo.
I really don't think there's any need to get so worked up about this.
totally agree...but it would be no worse than slapping on a turbocharger and cranking to boost up to 20psi....my statement was that NO2 is not going to cause more harm that the other types of power adders out there...NO2 is just as safe and reliable as those if done properly...Try bolting a 100hp kit on a stock 4cyl in real life like you can on GT4....sure it will run a few times, but it doesn't make it reliable. More than likely you will lean out the cylinders and watch the motor go BANG! I've seen it happen a couple of times with people putting 100hp nitrous kits on BMW M3's and watched them pop within 3 runs, both times!
GT fans must have in depth knowledge of tuning? I can see a few people in this thread who do know quite a bit about indepth tuning.
I have played around with all these tuning methods many times myself (in real life) and adding Nitrous Oxide or any forced induction doesn't automatically require forged pistons among other parts and it is silly to act like this is the case. It is all about a proper tune as Metfanant put it until the stresses exceed the capability of the mechanical parts, which is often a good amount more than standard power but this isn't limited to Nitrous Oxide induction.
Running a 50 wetshot of Nitrous on most engines above 2.0L (even more with larger engines) for extended periods (timing adjusted for any knock) of time is usually just fine unless the engine has bad design fault. Nitrous Oxide Systems even give you a list or recommended safe shots for standard engines.
notice i didn't say it wouldn't hurt your motor...what i said was it wouldn't hurt your motor any MORE than other forms of forced induction....
notice i also included "its all about the proper tune..." meaning tuning the engine....including all of your reflashing and timing etc...
i know PLENTY of cars running NO2 on totally stock motors. As long as you don't overdo the jetting on the nitrous kit you are plenty safe...you always have to compensate with the proper fuel and timing levels, thas is obvious, but the SAME can be said for any other form of forced induction....
of course your infinite knowledge of cars must have pushed your reading comprehension skills out of the way![]()
oh come on man...no need to go there about someone's name lol. One could say the same thing about naming yourself after character on a TV show that is more about entertainment then the cars....
are you trying to flex your car knowledge muscles or something? nobody is arguing this point at all...
True, but the AI is so incompetent most of the time that the simple act of being a human player is practically cheating.
The horror of losing to the AI by a lap in 'Like The Wind' just because you can't afford NOS![]()
I typed that in relevance to people who think they are right. Yes you are right, running a 50 wetshot or dryshot will not instantly hurt the engine in the span of the life of ownership of that car but it will wear out faster which leads to damage because a standard parts in most vehicles are only produced to handle the manufacturer specifications with 10% tolerance. Safe shots ratings is their way of telling consumers it will not damage your motor instantly, only slowly. Plus I was telling it by ways of the videogame which you have a cool amount of time to use it.
Oh please, you were just wrong and don't want to admit it...I read it as how it's typed. Retrofitting the meaning of that statement is a whole different ball game. My comprehension is fine, it's the way you executed
your meaning.
it most certainly does, but ill get there in a second...My name has absolutely have no relavance of what I was infering.
really? would have never guessedTokyo Drift refers to the movie F&F Tokyo Drift
WRONG, there is nothing wrong with enjoying the movie or even having a forum name based on it. it does not in anyway mean you are ignorant.which then leads to ignorance of teenages
it won't blow up because the gas is not flammable, but it will break down at high temperatures and cause a release of oxygen gas which can cause quite an explosion...think it will blow up like a gas tank,
it MOST CERTAINLY DOES...shows how much you know.putting a rear spoiler on FWD car helps with downforce,
No I don't get it because YOU don't get it. If it is ok for you to jump to the conclusion that someone is ignorant simply because their name is "Tokyo Drift" then i will jump to the conclusion that you are ignorant about cars because you like a show that is more about making you laugh then real automotive journalism.The Stig totally contradict the whole point.... get it?
"General Knowledge" is certainly a relative term. If you want to get technical I wouldn't put anything automotive in the "general knowledge" category because the average person knows VERY little about cars, especially how nitrous oxide works. It is "general knowledge" in my group of friends, about how to build and properly setup a computer. How to install and calibrate home theater equipment and other tech goodies....but I wouldn't consider ANY of that to be general knowledge for anyone.My car knowledge? Notice "As per general knowledge"
What happen to comprehension skills?