The coverage of Tiger over the weekend was a bit much. Was it impressive that he made a comeback? Yup. Was it impressive that he made the cut? Also yes. However, when he fell off the rails on Saturday I no longer cared. Scottie Scheffler is an incredible golfer and arguably a better golfer than Tiger was at 25. Scheffler made it to number 1 fast than any other golfer and that's impressive.
I was pulling for Mcllroy though. His charge on Sunday was awesome and he played one hell of a round. Still, I'm not upset Sheffler kept the lead though since he was so dominant the entire tournament. Cameron Smith really came on strong too but I think the pressure got to him a bit on Sunday. But being tied for third at the Masters is still quite a feat.
I'll probably hold off on watching any more golf until the PGA in May. I'm really looking forward to The Open though since it'll be at St. Andrews' Old Course this year. I didn't mind Royal St. George's last year, but there's just something about St. Andrews that is perfect for golf. Carnoustie is still my favorite though.
Ha. I almost completely agree with you here. The coverage from ESPN was pretty much exclusively Tiger Woods. They may as well have called it "Tiger Does The Masters." While Tiger is good for ratings-- and thus why he was the only person of interest as far as ESPN is concerned-- at some point The Network is going to have to realize that he's old and heading downhill after a gruesome and normally decimating injury. Maybe they wanted to just have their last shot to milk the bell cow. Who knows. I thought CBS was far better with their coverage and the treatment of the remainder of the field. This may have been prompted by the Green Brass at Augusta after watching how ESPN handled things. Tiger was first off the tee and pretty much done by 4:30pm, leaving the last 2.5 hours to cover the rest of the relevant players in what I thought were absolutely awesome groupings and pairings. Additionally, if you watched the "Featured Groups" feed on Augusta's website, it was far and away better than the Broadcast feed. To me, it seemed like this was the feed for "Golf Patrons", whereas the broadcast seemed to be produced for "Sports Fans".
Golf is a weird sport and plays to a weirder audience. Just look at their advertising. Most of the ads are targeting a presumptively very wealthy viewer. They feature people known in the "golf world," while most of the time clumsily attempting to connect the viewer to their product in the real world, and it's even clunkier when the product is something everyday people use. Look at AT&T's latest Masters barrage. It's like a weird shibboleth to be able to recognize Maria Fassi but not Eva Longoria. And if you're young and cool enough to know both of them, the odds that you're also going to instantly recognize both Nancy Lopez and Ben Crenshaw are slim to none.
What does that have to do with the above? Well, I would say Tiger Woods is the first golfer to ever cross over from the Golf World into the Real World and infiltrate pop culture and the mind of the everyday person. Why? Because he was so good and so different that this new mystique created its own hype machine. For as much as Tiger was ever hyped up, however, he would always live up to it, playing out of his mind and attracting more attention as the spotlight grew ever more intense. The only other parallel I can think of is Lance Armstrong and cycling. If you asked 1000 random people here to name a Tour de France cyclist, you wouldn't get one that could give you a name. But they would know Lance. Likewise, there are competitive eaters that have outdone Kobayashi, but nobody ever had the hype to spread the fame of Kobayashi and his 50-something hotdogs.
Scheffler right now probably is better than Tiger was at 25, but even when you consider the quantum leap in golf ball and club technology, coaching, training, swing tracking and shot monitoring advances, the greatness of Tiger Woods on the margin is still so much higher than Scheffler's. Everyone is
so good now, it's nuts. But you only appreciate that by entering Golf World, because nobody has been given the same platform or spotlight to shine through to the rest of the population.
This is where I think the networks are making a big mistake. They should be promoting young talent and the game, making it relatable for a sports fan. The DP World Tour does a good job of this, treating its athletes like characters to be followed. They give the audience insight into their golfers and their performances as they go along during events. The way ESPN and the American media handled Tiger over the past weekend has almost gotten to the point of prying. It was really annoying, and when you have amazing young talent like Scheffler and a dozen other guys under age 25 there's no question that they're dropping the ball with having the next generation of golf break through to the young generation to come.
I think Rory's charge was amazing and kind of rattled Cam Smith a bit. I was rooting for Cam after he finally figured out the greens, but was gutted when he hit the water at Amen Corner. That's just Rory being Rory though. He is so good when he's on. You might say his best golf is better than Tiger's, but unfortunately he's never been able to sustain the hype machine the same way Tiger did. His bunker shot on 18 was probably one of the best in Master's history, but because of the circumstances it'll unfortunately never be esteemed like Tiger On 16. Even with Morikawa holing out right after him. What a wild end!
I'm so looking forward to the rest of the majors this year. The PGA should be great. Hopefully Oklahoma is nice and windy for a wild weekend. Carnoustie is also one of my faves, but St. Andrews is St. Andrews.